Religion or NO Religion?

[porbidaman]

Why would I believe him at all?


Evolution huh!?

"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups."

Scientists tell why evolution is not supported by the facts!
Is Evolution a Proven Fact? Oh really!

"Kent Hovind, a former high school science teacher and bible believing Christian, is a favorite target of evolutionist and atheist attacks."
And you actually believe in this guy migo, w/ no scientific background?
Chick.com (Equipping for evangelism for over 50 years) A Christian website, and the issued date of the article is January/Feb. 1987 Do you have anything like the latest rebuttal, and from a secular website migo?

[quantum]

"Kent Hovind, a former high school science teacher and bible believing Christian, is a favorite target of evolutionist and atheist attacks."
And you actually believe in this guy migo, w/ no scientific background?
Chick.com (Equipping for evangelism for over 50 years) A Christian website, and the issued date of the article is January/Feb. 1987 Do you have anything like the latest rebuttal, and from a secular website migo?

Ah so you believe what is written on the internet then.
For you will not know those things if not on the internet.

One doesn't have to be a scientist to be believed.
You mean he was talking nonsense about the DNA issue?
The video was dated Dec 29, 2010.
The other site was 1987.
What's wrong with the year?
Darwins theory was on the 1800's.

I tend to believe on what he was talking about - the DNA.
As for the rest of him, i am not interest of what/who he is.

[porbidaman]

Ah so you believe what is written on the internet then.
For you will not know those things if not on the internet.

One doesn't have to be a scientist to be believed.
You mean he was talking nonsense about the DNA issue?
The video was dated Dec 29, 2010.
The other site was 1987.
What's wrong with the year?
Darwins theory was on the 1800's.

I tend to believe on what he was talking about - the DNA.
As for the rest of him, i am not interest of what/who he is.

Wow! you actually believed that guy migo?


Would you listen to an engineer if you have medical problems?
Would you listen to an accountant if you have mental health issues?
Would you listen to a kindergarten teacher if you have legal problems?

I'd rather listen to a geneticist/evolutionary biologist and their related fields when it comes to DNA issues.

[SioDenz]

Ah so you believe what is written on the internet then.
For you will not know those things if not on the internet.

One doesn't have to be a scientist to be believed.
You mean he was talking nonsense about the DNA issue?
The video was dated Dec 29, 2010.
The other site was 1987.
What's wrong with the year?
Darwins theory was on the 1800's.

I tend to believe on what he was talking about - the DNA.
As for the rest of him, i am not interest of what/who he is.

sadly yes, as long as Gikan sa scientific community, BISAG sila mismu wa ka Verify, Wa ka Experience personally, mu ingun dayun na sila nga - KINI 100% Truth ni...

[Jhared]

Ah so you believe what is written on the internet then.
For you will not know those things if not on the internet.

One doesn't have to be a scientist to be believed.
You mean he was talking nonsense about the DNA issue?
The video was dated Dec 29, 2010.
The other site was 1987.
What's wrong with the year?
Darwins theory was on the 1800's.

I tend to believe on what he was talking about - the DNA.
As for the rest of him, i am not interest of what/who he is.

Lol thank god that man is now in prison...

if you believed what he was talking about DNA you clearly had not read much about it., evolution is not about the number of Chromosomes we have, or the number of genes, for if one would say that aw, it would seem that a piece of corn is more evolved than us in every aspect, which is pretty much a ludicrous thought indeed...

it's not about the number of DNAs, it's about how these DNAs are synchronized to form a being, and that perpetual genetic force that molds DNA's to form apex species and improve them from time to time is really what evolution is all about..

One may argue that a piece of corn has more DNA than humans, but pieces of these corn DNAs does not have in them the encrypt to bring about brains, or hands, or ears, and much of these DNA's are dormant, hence it's humble genetic produce, the corn..

to put it in perspective, take for example an artist and an ordinary person is given the task to create art, the former given only red, blue, and green, and the latter given all colors of paint.. can you say that the latter can produce better art because he had more paint? certainly not.. that's what DNA is all about.. it's not really about the number of DNAs, it's about how these DNAs are synchronized..

[pakinimo]

Evolution is a fact.

Darwinian Theory of evolution is a theory.

Duha n kabuok, basin naglibug mo. FACT ng evolution mind you

[brendomar]

like i said i do not deny some of the events and people that are depicted in the bible. the events happened, the places are there and people existed BUT the portrayal in the bible of HOW exactly the events occurred is very sketchy and fairy tale like. and like my previous post, a lot of the stories in the bible are borrowed. meaning there have books long before the bible that depicts exactly the same story. So we just have to believe everything in the bible despite the many contradicting accounts from different people? even the story of jesus christ borrowed from the egyptians. go read about horus and isis, you will notice how startlingly similar is their story with jesus despite pre-dating the bible a couple of hundred of years.

migo unsa imong basis in comparing Jesus with other gods? gisabot nimog maayo ilang comparison kung unsa katinuod? kinsa may mga followers sa ubang ginoong gagmay kung naa man gani? napa tay mabasang mga account ana nila? hatagi mig link nga naay nangaconvert sa religion sa mga ginoong gagmay.

(extracted)>>>>
The claim that Jesus is a copy of mythological gods originated with authors whose works have been discounted by academia, contain logical fallacies, and cannot compare to the New Testament Gospels, which have withstood nearly 2,000 years of intense scrutiny. The alleged parallels between Jesus and other gods disappear when the original myths are examined. The Jesus-is-a-myth theory relies on selective descriptions, redefined words, and false assumptions.

Jesus Christ is unique in history, with His voice rising above all false gods’ as He asks the question that ultimately determines a person’s eternal destiny: “Who do you say I am?” (Matthew 16:15).

Read more: Is Jesus a myth? Is Jesus just a copy of the pagan gods of other ancient religions?

a religion that does not allow you to use basic common sense to dissect and try fully understand what they claim is very suspect. the fact that knowledge is shunned upon, as with the story of adam and eve, is a clear indication of an intent to be deceitful.
when you are given hard facts and evidence to support a claim, that is where you use common sense to decide which is believable. again religion will only demand you to not question the divine. you see the difference? apparently knowledge and common sense is not allowed in religion.

evidence is as clear as day. what is your excuse now?

daghan2 sang butang wla nimo madungog about Christianity migo. Try to search more and ask God's guidance if interested ka mkabalo sa kamatuoran diha ni Jesus Christ. Everyone is encouraged to ask questions in Christianity.

Why are you so afraid of subjective moral reasoning? (Do you lock your door at night?) - YouTube

[SioDenz]

Evolution is a fact.

Darwinian Theory of evolution is a theory.

Duha n kabuok, basin naglibug mo. FACT ng evolution mind you

according to?

[pakinimo]

according to?

You gotta be kidding me.

Mao na sya kung d ka mag basa ayha mag sturya. hehehehhe

Mao na maglibug naka kay wa kay basa2x ug wa ka kasabot nganung both fact ang theory na

[SioDenz]

You gotta be kidding me.

Mao na sya kung d ka mag basa ayha mag sturya. hehehehhe

Mao na maglibug naka kay wa kay basa2x ug wa ka kasabot nganung both fact ang theory na

wa ko nalibog, Facts according to the FINDING of YOU? or According to the scientific community?