The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[beyee]

---

Since you can't understand simple rules in here.
Posts that don't answer to the topic at hand will
be deleted outright and the one posting will receive
an infraction.

If the OTs persist, this thread will have to go too.

[TheClockworks]

[noy]

alright folks, let's go back to the TOPIC.. Questions for Roman Catholic Church..

[heartthr0b]

daghana pa diay creationists diri oi...di na sila mutuo og evolution pero mutuo na silag mostorya nga bitin..
bwahahaha

[SioDenz]

Mao maka conclude ko na EVOLUTION IS A FACT based on the OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE presented by THE SCIENTISTS, Now kung mu disagree ka sa akoa na dili na tinuod ang evolution, e explain sa akoa kung asa gikan ang mga modern humans sa imung nahibaw.an, kay basig mu tuo pa ko nimo. (lol)

Overwhelming? Meaning Theory and Speculations that will Correct itself from time to time?

That's the beauty of science, Kay pwede ra mu change basing on the evidence presented. Maski gina consider ang isa ka butang as a "FACT" during that time pwede siya mu change if naay hard evidence that would challenge it's authenticity.

How can Inconsistency become a thing of Beauty?

So since you agree that SCIENCE will correct itself from time to time. Meaning You agree that What you call a FACT today Will be DEBUNK tomorrow?

Meaning FACT is Basically RELATIVE?

So when You say FACT today - is Just saying its a FACT until Proven WRONG? nindota gud.

It is still not a fact, Because nothing is a fact on science without solid proof and adequate knwoledge on the subject. But there is a big possibility that something can actually come from nothing kay wala pa jud nato na diskobrehan ug maayo ang universe, because there are certain areas on our universe that defies the laws of physics and are yet to be discovered, mao daghan kaayog possibilities.

So if Evolution is a FACT, and we are created by Random - Wheres the Solid Proof of our Randomness or Proof of our Origin billion of years ago? Does Speculation a Solid Proof?

- - - Updated - - -

Science itself DEMANDS that for any Theory to be a FACT, Evolution Theorists has to prove the following:

1. THE THEORY NEEDS TO BE REPLICATED.

2. There is SOLID MATERIAL EVIDENCE of what it asserts.
- Evolutionists have FAILED big time to present a CHRONOLOGICAL, DETAILED, PRECISE, AND ACCURATE material evidence of the missing links.


Where are the LIVING human-monkey intermediate forms ? ? ? ?
Oh wait, they've turned into fossils. (standard answer from evolutionists).
REALLY ? ? ?
(So much for the clownish reply from evolutionists.)

And the Fun part is: They think the Inconsistencies of Science is a Thing of BEAUTY... hehe

A FACT that will correct itself from Time to time and is Beautiful according them... hehe

[SioDenz]

That's the beauty of science bro, it will admit when its wrong. How about religion?

Yeah, if there are things in the BIBLE that you classify as So-called inconsistencies (which can be explained) - You are very Quick to Judge it as Fiction or the Whole Book is not true.

But When Science Proove itself to be inconsistent and will always Correct itself from time to time throughout the Centuries - its a thing of BEAUTY?

Kinsay imung giilad ani?

[SioDenz]

Question nlan sa mga RC:

Since RC claim that you are the one who Compiled the Bible. Is there any Guidelines how those people compiled it? and how about those Not included?

i ask this because i watch some documentaries about some books or writings not included in our modern bible that has some significance to the teachings of God.

[porbidaman]

Yeah, if there are things in the BIBLE that you classify as So-called inconsistencies (which can be explained) - You are very Quick to Judge it as Fiction or the Whole Book is not true.

But When Science Proove itself to be inconsistent and will always Correct itself from time to time throughout the Centuries - its a thing of BEAUTY?

Kinsay imung giilad ani?

Of course, its a thing of BEAUTY because SCIENCE will bow their heads and admit when they're wrong. And then repeat the process of experimenting and verifying until they'll come up w/ the correct answer. Here familiarize yourself w/ this meme...


And by the way, you never answered my post regarding biblical inconsistencies...

[SioDenz]

Of course, its a thing of BEAUTY because SCIENCE will bow their heads and admit when they're wrong. And then repeat the process of experimenting and verifying until they'll come up w/ the correct answer. Here familiarize yourself w/ this meme...

OT ni...

So in what LOGICAL sense would you USE a RELATIVE medium to QUESTION an ABSOLUTE?

So you say that the BIBLE or GOD is ABSOLUTELY Not TRUE - BASED on a Medium that is RELATIVE and is NOT sure if its already discover the TRUTH, and that medium will Correct itself from time to time?
-Is that what you call Beauty? wow. I think is more like D*mbness...

SCIENCE will admit it is WRONG.... After it already declared it as FACT... what a Sh*tty mentality... hehe

And by the way, you never answered my post regarding biblical inconsistencies...

whats the sense of Answering an ATHEIST about the inconsistencies in the Bible if you don't believe in GOD which is the Source of the BIBLE?
If you question the Bible, the Answer will COME FROM the Bible because it can explain itself. But you dont Believe any of the Bible, so you dont believe the answer that will be given to you. so its a waste of TIME.

But if you believed in God and God is the Source of the Bible teachings, then i will gladly answer you...

[SioDenz]

Mao ba. Cge kung dili tinuod ang evolution, asa diay gikan ang mga modern humans? pwede paki explain?

LOL, mulihay lagi dayun...

Mao ni Tubag sa kana cge rag Copy paste bah, If pangutan-on about sa iyang stand or sa iyang gi post mulihay...