The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[R.Forster]

---

Naa kay Irrefutable Physical Evidence ani? or Mubalik nsad ta sa Nabasa sa WEB?

Using the word Somewhere is not Even SURE... Dili sure ang Internet so Dili sad Sure ang ni kopya...

Oploka jud nimo oi, somewhere gani kay walay exact date kadtung gi imbento nang fairytale bibile ninyo, but all evidence suggest that your fairytale bible was written not more than 2000 years ago, kanang mga moses moses ug abraham fairytale sa bible that allegedly happened hundreds of years before the fictional Jesus story was also written not more than 2000 years ago.

[battouter]

Coming from a person nga Internet ra ghapon ang Source, gi unsa nimu pagka hibalo sad nga ang imung Source nga Gikan ra sad sa INternet Tinuod ug walay Bias?

Abi kay mao imung Gikopya tinuod nya if supak nimu Bias or Tampered? hehe

CNN is now not a reliable source? okay.....

this is what you call a self pwn. LOLs

taken directly from your source

1. They’re residences, not homes. The mansions included in this article are not the personal property of the bishops, but belong to the diocese.

defend even though the glaring discrepancies. the wonders of religion. big pimpin'! woop! woop!

[noy]

lol, your pro-catholic site/link neither denies that those estates are owned by the catholic church. big pimpin'! woop! woop!

sa Church jud bitaw na nga property,may problema ana? Lol ang problema diha kung naka pangalan sa archbiishop..hahaha
natural pro catholic site jud na akong i refer sa imu 'cause the last time i checked, answers from this thread should be coming from the catholic perspective..

ang alegre ana..Q and A for RCC dayun ang manubag kay di mutuo sa RCC doctrines dayun ilang pagsabut pa jud gamiton...
di lang kay Off Topic..not following instructions pa jud..hahaha...


ok, next question..legit questions unta.. hahaha

- - - Updated - - -

sus naa na pud nang mga name calling...LOL gamay nalay kuwang...
dial na tag 911 ani...hehehe...

[battouter]

sa Church jud bitaw na nga property,may problema ana? Lol

so money well spent? LOL okaaay.... archbishops! big pimpin'! woop! woop!

[noy]

Who created the Christian God? Answer: Humans somewhere 2000 years ago who want to manipulate and control other humans.

apparently that answer is not coming from the Catholic perspective bai therefore you are Off Topic and on top of that, your posts directly violates Forum Rule number 2..

[noy]

so money well spent? LOL okaaay.... archbishops! big pimpin'! woop! woop!

unsa may problema ana kung nindut ang among simbahan ug puy.anan sa mga archbishop? hehehe..
sala ba diay sa archbishop kung nindut iyang puy.anan? hahahaha...

like i said, ang issue diha is if naka pangalan sa Archbishop mismo ang iyang puy.anan
kay if that were the case..mahulog ug gihimo niyang personal property ang Archbishop's palace and with that being said points out that the donations made by the people were corrupted by the Archbishop..
and of course as we can all see, the Properties were the Church's property..
so way kaso..

murag malacanang ba..naa diha ang presidente nagpuyo pero di na iyaha...
which is natural because kita mga tao nga nag bayad ug tax sa gobyerno ang nag tus2x tanang mga government facilities...
reklamo ta by the time nga i rehistro na as property ni noynoy ang malacanang kay ang tax sa taong bayan ang gigamit ana pag tukod..
but as far as the malacanang palace remains a property of Philippine Government aw..way kaso pud na

[battouter]

unsa may problema ana kung nindut ang among simbahan ug puy.anan sa mga archbishop? hehehe..
sala ba diay sa archbishop kung nindut iyang puy.anan? hahahaha...

like i said, ang issue diha if naka pangalan sa Archbishop mismo ang iyang puy.anan
kay if that were the case..mahulog ug personal property sa Archbishop and therefore points out that the donations made by the people were corrupted by the Archbishop..mao gi highlight nga sa Church to nga property...

murag malacanang ba..naa diha ang presidente nagpuyo pero di na iyaha...
which is natural because kita mga tao nga nag bayad ug tax sa gobyerno ang nag tus2x tanang government facility...
reklamo ta by the time nga i rehistro na as property ni noynoy ang malacanang unya tax sa taong bayan ang gigamit pag tukod..

okaaaaay... defend at all cost.

[noy]

okaaaaay... defend at all cost.

haha! at all cost? not really..just explaining to you in perspectives that you do not hold..
kung para nimu excuse na then so be it...however, tabla ra ug ning suggest ka that the president of the Philippines should be questioned for enjoying his stay in the malacanang palace.. LOL

[battouter]

haha! at all cost? not really..just explaining to you in perspectives that you do not hold..
kung para nimu excuse na then so be it...however, tabla ra ug ning suggest ka that the president of the Philippines should be questioned for enjoying his stay in the malacanang palace.. LOL

lol not really... you've just proven my point. good thing your pope is a more sensible man. bye.

[noy]

lol not really... you've just proven my point. good thing your pope is a more sensible man. bye.

your point that we should question the Church for having grand and fine architectural works tungod sa mga donations?
why?at least klaro diba?..dako ug donation...kita pud sa simbahan...so unsa may problema ana?

nag sige diay ka ug donate nganu affected man kaayo ka? in the first place you do not consider yourself as someone who belongs with the Catholic Church. kana kung gipugos ka ug pa donate nga wala kay interest aning mga butanga aw..reklamo by all means..hahahaha

prehas sa atong tax bah..magsige tag yaw2x sa situation sa atong nasod..kay nadatu nalang ang mga politician kita dako kaayo ta ug tax..unya gamay ray nakitang kauswagan...hahahaha...kana...angay tang mureklamo..

kanang atong mga sinsilyo nga ihulog diha sa sibut..kuwang pa na ipang bayad sa monthly bills sa Church ug maintenance as well as sweldo sa mga tao nga nagtrabaho sa simbahan...
kung naa man ganiy mas angayan mureklamo kadtong dagko kaayo ug hinatagan sa donation nga maka patukod jud ug simbahan..

but so far, ang mga kusog kaayo mureklamo kadtong tag singko or even piso ray gihatag...di pa jud consistent..hahahaha...
this can be proven with your case, obviously, wa jud kay hatag2x kay di man ka katoliko.. so why trouble yourself with these things?

if imu jud nang ipamugos nga questionon ang mga archbishop for enjoying their stay at the archbishop's palaces..
then sugdi na ug question si noynoy ug tanang presidente nganu naa sila sa malacanang nagpuyo..kay mao ray logic ana..LOL

as long as wala gi register under the bishop's name ang palace and remains as property of the Catholic Church which in most general sense..sa tibuok simbahang Katoloko which would technically include those who recognise themselves as Catholics..
aw walay problema...

in the same way, that the malacanang remains a property of the Philippine Covernment which means the entire Filipino nation and not under the President's personal assets..again..walay problema ana...

Next Question please..