
Originally Posted by
reggielovescake
Soooo... unsa man gyud atong ibutang aning adam & eve? Literal or metaphor? Galibug na ko ninyo.
Kung literal, ofcourse that is not plausible because we came from homo erectus. They dont have the
Intellectual Capacity we have right now na makasabot ra ug usa ka storya
Kung metaphor man sad gani, ngano lage imo man kong idout sa sala sakong lolo ug lola nga in the first
place, di man na akong sala.. ilaha mana? Kay abig lolo nako sila pareha na mig sala? Unsa man akong
bag.ohon nga wala man koy gibuhat sayup?
kung biblia basihan? ADam and Eve ko, kanang methaphor pakit-a sa ko verse kay wala ko kahibaw ana.
regarding sala...murag humana man kog tubag ani sa pangutana ni jahred
- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by
pakinimo
Kadungog nako ani woooooo
1. He only asserted that evil is the absence of god. Yet he cannot prove it.
2. Open the professors head and see the brain
3. The law of empirical bla blah isnt about "have you seen your brain?" but rather "is there a way that we may see your brain?
4. There is no absolute proof that this conversion took place.
5. If it did take place, einstein would be pretty damn stupid to have such flaws in his argument
Extra: nindota nmog source,
urban LEGENDS, naglibug ko if nagsupport ka ana or imong gi disprove

sure ka na wala ma prove ni Einstein? kay kung sure ka na wala niya ma prove, mas labaw namo nga wala ninyo ma prove, inyo ra baya sad na siyang idol