Mystery man shoots jeepney robber dead

[poche]

---

@cliff_drew if killing a criminal is a crime, so pasabot ang mga PULIS na nkapatay ug Killer Criminal sad. then kato Sundalo nga nipatay ug terrosista sa MIndanao Criminal sad?

PULIS = CRIMINAL
ARMY = CRIMINAL
if i see somebody stabbing my son with a knife, unya aq sad xang dunggabon then namatay. so i should consider myself a criminal? hmmm??
c'mon @cliff_drew stop taking drugz man

They are license to kill bro..heheheh

[timoyans]

They are license to kill bro..heheheh

sure? naa diay lixenxe to kill? pwedi send nimu naku ang link?

[timoyans]

They are license to kill bro..heheheh

if ill understand this literally

Driving license = can drive a specific car legally
PRC license = can practice a profession specified on their license legally
Gun license = can posses a gun legally
License to kill = can kill legally? hmmmp?

if iam a policeman/military unya naa koy nakit an nanghasi dha, ug wa ko ganahi sa iyang nawng kay maot kaayu, pwedi diay naku patyon ditso na di makasuha kay i have th license to kill legally?

please explain further kay wa ko ka gets sa imung giingon na license

[jackson428]

if ill understand this literally

Driving license = can drive a specific car legally
PRC license = can practice a profession specified on their license legally
Gun license = can posses a gun legally
License to kill = can kill legally? hmmmp?

if iam a policeman/military unya naa koy nakit an nanghasi dha, ug wa ko ganahi sa iyang nawng kay maot kaayu, pwedi diay naku patyon ditso na di makasuha kay i have th license to kill legally?

please explain further kay wa ko ka gets sa imung giingon na license

si james bond ra naa license to kill.. ang uban kay under the rules of engagement (whatever rules they put into place kay lahi2x mn kada nasud)

anyway back on topic, to me the act of killing a person that way is not the way to go BUT seeing that our petty criminals has stepped it up long ago by sticking people up and then shooting/killing them after they got what they want, then that makes me think they just deserve whats coming to them such as this act. There is no one size fits all way of doing this but at least this gives petty criminals something to think about before they decide to pull the trigger

[hamtaro.jan]

If proper, when to shoot = if causing death or injury to the police officer or other persons.
Kaso DMD diri sa pinas hehehe.

[cliff_drew]

@cliff_drew if killing a criminal is a crime, so pasabot ang mga PULIS na nkapatay ug Killer Criminal sad. then kato Sundalo nga nipatay ug terrosista sa MIndanao Criminal sad?

PULIS = CRIMINAL
ARMY = CRIMINAL

No.

if i see somebody stabbing my son with a knife, unya aq sad xang dunggabon then namatay. so i should consider myself a criminal? hmmm??

Yes.

Above questions don't require explanation unless you don't have common sense or you are after of flaming this thread in which you are fun of doing.

[cliff_drew]

so the hero is a criminal ,, ,, and he is a good criminal kay hero man siya, unsa d i imu definition sa criminal sir?

Criminal is a person with criminal liability, that is, what he have done was against the law. Let's use the example here. A robber initially did not show any weapon nor had the intention to kill the woman since he was only after of the woman's shoulder bag. Then an unidentified man with a hand gun came into the scene when he saw the commotion and wanted to prevent the unarmed robber from fleeing. Does this man has the authority to prevent the robbery? He didn't introduced himself as a policeman. If he is, killing an unarmed robber on the spot is mere violation of their rules of engagement. Policemen are trained to be best thinkers at all times. If the man was a civilian, citizens arrest could have applied. If the gun used was a licensed one, he may have violations too. We can never answer all these 'ifs' when there's no proper investigation.

Bottomline, killing a criminal is acceptable as long as it can be justified according to our laws. No single violator will be considered a hero. Am I correct @hamtaro.jan?

[hamtaro.jan]

Criminal is a person with criminal liability, that is, what he have done was against the law. Let's use the example here. A robber initially did not show any weapon nor had the intention to kill the woman since he was only after of the woman's shoulder bag. Then an unidentified man with a hand gun came into the scene when he saw the commotion and wanted to prevent the unarmed robber from fleeing. Does this man has the authority to prevent the robbery? He didn't introduced himself as a policeman. If he is, killing an unarmed robber on the spot is mere violation of their rules of engagement. Policemen are trained to be best thinkers at all times. If the man was a civilian, citizens arrest could have applied. If the gun used was a licensed one, he may have violations too. We can never answer all these 'ifs' when there's no proper investigation.

Bottomline, killing a criminal is acceptable as long as it can be justified according to our laws. No single violator will be considered a hero. Am I correct @hamtaro.jan?

Yes sir correct ka... Mao jud na proper rules of engagement.

Maka tintal mo takelife labaw na to sige pangigo sa area of our responsibility. hehe

[converse23]

ibalik ang death penalty para mu lesser ang crime rate sa pinas

[cliff_drew]

ibalik ang death penalty para mu lesser ang crime rate sa pinas

OT: We had death penalty law before but was repealed as it did not contribute in lowering crime rate. Proposed nasad to revive it? Wake up dude.