The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[Arteezy]

---

LOL ingun diay ko ana... ?

if by one you mean person then of course basic math the answer would be three..
1 person + 1 person + person = 3 persons, but this does not necessarily mean 3 gods..LOL

because 1 being does not necessarily mean 1 person as well..
pareha sa iro, being man na kay nag exist ug buhi man..pero dili na siya person..

you just compared your god to a dog...ROFLMAO


of course god is not a person because he is not human being lol...

he meant person as "character"..

jesus, holy ghost, and godfather have 3 distinct character/personalities therefore you can't call them ONE

1+1+1= 3 not 1

all of you failed to understand this rofl...

[noy]

misahan gihapon pero sure dili nana malangit

Lord, ikaw ba yan? hehehehe...

[noy]

you just compared your god to a dog...ROFLMAO


of course god is not a person because he is not human being lol...

he meant person as "character"..

jesus, holy ghost, and godfather have 3 distinct character/personalities therefore you can't call them ONE

1+1+1= 3 not 1

all of you failed to understand this rofl...

sige tagaan ug chance..i'll treat this as a question..

sakto ka brad, dili siya human being..mao ayaw siya i restrict sa human nature nga 1 being = 1 person pud..kay hinaggaw jud kaayo na..hahaha
in the same way nga dili nimu ma apply ang human nature with that of animals kay sila 1 being = 0 person.

pero kana imung giingun nga God is not a person because he is not a human being..dako kaayo nang simyat bai..
a person is someone who has intellect, naay wisdom or basically anything that would point out to the characteristics of a human being..
on the contrary, God is the PERFECT PERSON hinuon.
therfore God is not a human being but would still be considered as a person..tulo pa man gani ka persona..hahaha

and DILI lagi na prehas ang being ug person..
a being can either be a person or not..hence the dog example.. not in the sense that i compared God to a dog oi..Lol (kaw ha..ingnan bitaw ta ka pangutana ug tarong..tan.awa na joke napud nuon ka..)pagtoytoy baya ani...hahaha

mao lagi, Father,Son, Spirit 3 different persons, 3 different characters but this does not necessarily mean 3 gods..

ang insakto nga representation sa Trinity bai is not 1+1+1=1(kataw.anan kaayo na tawn oi) but 3 in 1..murag kape bah..
naay sugar(pampatam-is), kape(pait-pait..bitter sa iningles.prehas nimu..LOL) ug cream(para additional flavor)..
3 different tastes but 1 pack of coffee..

again, wa jud mi nag ingun nga ang trinity kay 1+1+1 = 1 LOL
ikaw ra ana...pagsulo ana imung 1+1+1=1 ambut lang....hahahahaha

[Arteezy]

ang insakto nga representation sa Trinity bai is not 1+1+1=1 but 3 in 1..murag kape bah..

dili diay pareha ng 3 in 1 sa 1+1+1= 1??

asa imong logic? ahahaha



so ang asukar, kape og cream kay pareha ra na sila??

bwahahaha..

[NapoleonBlownapart]

you mean 1+1+1=1 ROFL

Nope because they are not separate beings..

[NapoleonBlownapart]

dili diay pareha ng 3 in 1 sa 1+1+1= 1??

asa imong logic? ahahaha



so ang asukar, kape og cream kay pareha ra na sila??

bwahahaha..

Sakto nang 3 in 1 but in the sense na murag kape di kaayo ko mouyon ana na analogy. In some sense ma relate but not the entirety. The 3 persons are distinct like sa asukar, kape, ug cream but diha ra kutob ang analogy. It falls short kay while the three persons are distinct they have one and the same essence. Ang asukar, kape, ug cream are not one and the same essence.

[Arteezy]

Nope because they are not separate beings..

so you agree with the muslim??

[noy]

dili diay pareha ng 3 in 1 sa 1+1+1= 1??

asa imong logic? ahahaha



so ang asukar, kape og cream kay pareha ra na sila??

bwahahaha..

haha! di diay kita sa akong logic bai? basin ug nabiyaan ka maong di ka kita..nyahahaha! joke ra na ha. half meant..Lol

prehas sila in the sense that they all compose a single pack of 3 in 1 coffee...
but they are different in terms of functionalities..

3 in 1 is never the same with 1+1+1=1

3 in 1 is collective which means usa ra..in the case of 1 pack of 3 in 1 coffee..3 ingredients but 1 pack of coffee..
sa Ginoo pud 3 persons...pero usa ra ka Diyos..simple ra kaayo na..hehehe

while 1+1+1 is just adding things up which of course as a sum you'll get 3..
so father+son+spirit = 3 persons.. and coffee+sugar+cream = 3 ingredients..

therefore 1+1+1=3 represents the 3 persons of the trinity
3 in 1 represents the Holy Trinity
and 1+1+1=1 represents your logic..hahahahaha!!!

mangutana ko..kung mupalit ka ug 3 in 1 nga kape sa tindahan..
muingon ba diay ka nga manang tindera! papalita ko ug kape,cream,ug sugar..
diba tagaan kag 3 different things...pero ug muingon ka ug 1 pack of 3 in 1 coffee please...
Usa ra jud nay ihatag sa imu..kompletos recados..naa ang sugar,cream and coffee in ONE.. inseprabble..
God? Father,Son and Spirit.. inseprable pud..

kahibaw ko kasabut ka but di lang jud ka ganahan musabut..LOL

kung wala nay follow up questions..na hala! let's move on to the next one

- - - Updated - - -

Sakto nang 3 in 1 but in the sense na murag kape di kaayo ko mouyon ana na analogy. In some sense ma relate but not the entirety. The 3 persons are distinct like sa asukar, kape, ug cream but diha ra kutob ang analogy. It falls short kay while the three persons are distinct they have one and the same essence. Ang asukar, kape, ug cream are not one and the same essence.

Yes i agree with you..i am not pointing out to the essence of the trinity bai..
just the Fact that although they are three different persons, usa ra na sila ka Ginoo.

essence of the each person in the trinity is another subject..samot nag kalibug nang migo nimu kung imung hansakan ana..
so hinay-hinay lang ta ug explain sa iya..hehehehehe

but thanks for pointing that out

[NapoleonBlownapart]

so you agree with the muslim??

No, because the muslim's point is that there are three persons therefore there are three beings. That's why he said "...not three persons but one. What language are you speaking?"

- - - Updated - - -

Yes i agree with you..i am not pointing out to the essence of the trinity bai..
just the Fact that although they are three different persons, usa ra na sila ka Ginoo.

essence of the each person in the trinity is another subject..samot nag kalibug nang migo nimu kung imung hansakan ana..
so hinay-hinay lang ta ug explain sa iya..hehehehehe

but thanks for pointing that out

Ako lang nang giklaro para sa atong migo diri kay na confuse na ug sugod kay gi assume na niya nga kanang analogy nimo ma explain na tanan..hahaha

[noy]

actually wala man juy perfect nga example sa Trinity nga makita diri sa kalibutan..
because the Trinity is in perfect union..

pero the closest would be our body,soul and spirit..

body nako -noy
soul nako - noy gihapun
spirit nako -noy gihapun...

pero dili gihapun perfect because most if not all the time..the flesh contradicts with the spirit..Lol
unlike the Holy Trinity in perfect unison..and perfectly the same in essence..