Suggestions to improve our government systems

[shearts]

---

ALL formerly elected? How can you justify who are those 'really' TRAPO?

anyone who holds office, that's to say from the president, down to barangay captains & everyone in between. that will include direct & indirect family members.

from how i see it, even if some managed to sneak in, they won't be able to really abuse their power because certain provisions from the new constitution(federalism/parliamentary system) should prevent or at the very least, limit their power.

there are so many provisions we can think of to make our country the best it can be BUT this is only wishful thinking until we as the people make this happen.

[rayven716]

Send Sen. Enrile, Estrada, Revila and all congressmen involved in the pork barrel scam to jail now to set an example that stealing people's money does not pay.

[SioDenz]

Tinood jud na .. parihas sa 1987 gi butaran approve dayon sa mga tawo ( dipa ko ka butar ato nga time ) .. bisan walay basa2x kay cory lagi intown ... puede unta usabon pero ang mga naka bintaha supak ....

So mas Bogo tong mga tawo sa una, nya ikaw mas Brayt kumpara nila?

- - - Updated - - -

my suggestion, go for the root cause of all the country's problem. change the constitution.

i know it's very difficult but this is not impossible. write the constitution from scratch & once naa na final draft, dapat ipabasa & ipaklaro ang mga provisions to all people concern. that's to say, kita mga pinoy & before na ma-implement, dapat, everyone will agree on all the terms & provisions for the new Philippine constitution.

Unsa gud tawn pagka ROOT Cause sa isa ka Constitution?

Ang nag sunod ug nag Implementar sa instution maoy Root cause Dili ang Balaod.

Example:
Ginadili paglabay ug basura, multa, bisag i priso pa - Nahunong ba ang paglabay? WALA. So since wala nahunong ang BALAOD diay maoy ROOT cause?
-Ang root cause ang nagpa inplement ug ang mga tawo nga wa nisunod.


Wala man guroy balaod nga PEREFECT, Pero if maayu ang implementation ug maayu ang nagsunod, Positive ghapon ang resulta.

Nya if ig Usab sa Constituion dili mupabor nimu - mu angal nsad ka? mu ingun nsad Usbon nsad?

[shearts]

Unsa gud tawn pagka ROOT Cause sa isa ka Constitution?

Ang nag sunod ug nag Implementar sa instution maoy Root cause Dili ang Balaod.

Example:
Ginadili paglabay ug basura, multa, bisag i priso pa - Nahunong ba ang paglabay? WALA. So since wala nahunong ang BALAOD diay maoy ROOT cause?
-Ang root cause ang nagpa inplement ug ang mga tawo nga wa nisunod.


Wala man guroy balaod nga PEREFECT, Pero if maayu ang implementation ug maayu ang nagsunod, Positive ghapon ang resulta.

Nya if ig Usab sa Constituion dili mupabor nimu - mu angal nsad ka? mu ingun nsad Usbon nsad?

i don't know if this is a joke or not, but if it's the latter, isip2x din pag may time.

do you know what a constitution is exactly? are you even aware that the constitution is the foundation on how senators & congressmen make laws? hahaay

i never said we could make perfect laws. what i said is to change the constitution so we can make our country better.

people like you, are the by-products of oligarchial tyranny in our country. poor & extremely limited education for the masses begets narrow minded population.

taught enough to know something but dumb enough to be manipulated.

[cliff_drew]

anyone who holds office, that's to say from the president, down to barangay captains & everyone in between. that will include direct & indirect family members.

from how i see it, even if some managed to sneak in, they won't be able to really abuse their power because certain provisions from the new constitution(federalism/parliamentary system) should prevent or at the very least, limit their power.

there are so many provisions we can think of to make our country the best it can be BUT this is only wishful thinking until we as the people make this happen.

I asked if all formerly elected officials will not be able to hold public office in the new constitution, this would mean even those who are doing good will be included as well. I disagree, there are still good public servants out there. And also, would you like to have a government run by neophytes? Even a company will not allow this type of set-up or else business will eventually shut down.

[amingb]

@SioDenz ... daghan bright sa una sir sio naa lang jud mas daghan nga lazy bisan bright ... kapoyan na basa labi na balaod lisod sabton .... sunod ug naay referendum basa2x pud ta ug naay time ... heheheh

Bitaw Constitution jud ang maka usab dagan sa pamolitika ... labi kuhaon nang mga nakabutang sa constitution nga as define by law ...

[SioDenz]

i don't know if this is a joke or not, but if it's the latter, isip2x din pag may time.

do you know what a constitution is exactly? are you even aware that the constitution is the foundation on how senators & congressmen make laws? hahaay

i never said we could make perfect laws. what i said is to change the constitution so we can make our country better.

people like you, are the by-products of oligarchial tyranny in our country. poor & extremely limited education for the masses begets narrow minded population.

taught enough to know something but dumb enough to be manipulated.

So you think by changing the constitution will solve All our problems as a nation? You seriously believed that when our constitution is change for whatever provisions you can think of - our country will have 180 Shift sa atung Direction? wow...

Constitution is only a TOOL, it does NOT COMPRISE the entirety of a NATION.

And what about people like you? the so-called expert because they Just read some article in the NET?
Where are your QUALIFICATION to back up your Theory? Copy paste ra sad sa INTERNET nya Feeling Expert na dayun ka?

Di kaha ikaw maoy isa sa hinugdan sa kaalautan sa atung nasud? kanang Feeling expert bisag way qualification to back it Up?

Ayaw palabi sa imung pagka expert dong...

- - - Updated - - -

@SioDenz ... daghan bright sa una sir sio naa lang jud mas daghan nga lazy bisan bright ... kapoyan na basa labi na balaod lisod sabton .... sunod ug naay referendum basa2x pud ta ug naay time ... heheheh

Bitaw Constitution jud ang maka usab dagan sa pamolitika ... labi kuhaon nang mga nakabutang sa constitution nga as define by law ...

unsa diay mga Provision atung i change para mausab ang dagan sa Politika?

If mausab ang dagan sa politika, mahaw as kaha ta sa kalisud?

If dunay bag-o nga balaod sa Constitution, ENOUGH nah na siya?

[shearts]

So you think by changing the constitution will solve All our problems as a nation? You seriously believed that when our constitution is change for whatever provisions you can think of - our country will have 180 Shift sa atung Direction? wow...

Constitution is only a TOOL, it does NOT COMPRISE the entirety of a NATION.

And what about people like you? the so-called expert because they Just read some article in the NET?
Where are your QUALIFICATION to back up your Theory? Copy paste ra sad sa INTERNET nya Feeling Expert na dayun ka?

Di kaha ikaw maoy isa sa hinugdan sa kaalautan sa atung nasud? kanang Feeling expert bisag way qualification to back it Up?

Ayaw palabi sa imung pagka expert dong...

aaww..you got offended by telling you the truth dodong? tsk tsk tsk...


we had 27 years worth of hardship & misery following the 1987 Philippine constitution, kuwang pa na nimo?

"Constitution is only a TOOL, it does NOT COMPRISE the entirety of a NATION." - oh yes, the constitution is merely a simple tool & not the backbone of an entire country! LOL! (sic!) (sarcasm!)

you want proof of how amazingly "astute" you really are? very well, let me qoute your very, uhm "sensible" reply earlier.

Unsa gud tawn pagka ROOT Cause sa isa ka Constitution?

Ang nag sunod ug nag Implementar sa instution maoy Root cause Dili ang Balaod.

Example:
Ginadili paglabay ug basura, multa, bisag i priso pa - Nahunong ba ang paglabay? WALA. So since wala nahunong ang BALAOD diay maoy ROOT cause?
-Ang root cause ang nagpa inplement ug ang mga tawo nga wa nisunod.


Wala man guroy balaod nga PEREFECT, Pero if maayu ang implementation ug maayu ang nagsunod, Positive ghapon ang resulta.

Nya if ig Usab sa Constituion dili mupabor nimu - mu angal nsad ka? mu ingun nsad Usbon nsad?

"-Ang root cause ang nagpa inplement ug ang mga tawo nga wa nisunod." - for starters, the word is "implement", not inplement. LOL!

"Ang nag sunod ug nag Implementar sa instution maoy Root cause Dili ang Balaod." - say what?? institution? don't you mean "constitution? LOL!

the lawmakers & the people who follow them are the root cause & not the law itself?? LMAO! this is getting funnier & funnier!

"Pero if maayu ang implementation ug maayu ang nagsunod, Positive ghapon ang resulta." - how can it be positive when the constitution itself is already f*%#+d up? you're expecting positive results from the 1987 Philippine constitution? wow, that's a very sensible answer! LOL!

asenso kaayo ang Pinas kung tarungon lang pag-implement ang baluktot na systema!

- - - Updated - - -

I asked if all formerly elected officials will not be able to hold public office in the new constitution, this would mean even those who are doing good will be included as well. I disagree, there are still good public servants out there. And also, would you like to have a government run by neophytes? Even a company will not allow this type of set-up or else business will eventually shut down.

hmm this calls for a smart debate. it's true there are good politicians out there but it's very hard to tell who those good politicians really are.

i mean, this is just one of the provisions i'm suggesting & it can always be ammended to make it better.

[M.A.D.]

Trivia: Did you know that should the national broadband project aka NBN ZTE or something similar was successful it would have revolutionized how government does its daily duties. Unfortunately it was a chinese corporation who won the bidding hence the americans did not want any part of it that's why you have the NBN ZTE scandal.

The trial expose brouhahaha blah blah was just a misdirection the real issue was national security. You don't want chinese snooping and spying on your data transfers especially if you are a US vassal state.

[SioDenz]

aaww..you got offended by telling you the truth dodong? tsk tsk tsk...


we had 27 years worth of hardship & misery following the 1987 Philippine constitution, kuwang pa na nimo?

"Constitution is only a TOOL, it does NOT COMPRISE the entirety of a NATION." - oh yes, the constitution is merely a simple tool & not the backbone of an entire country! LOL! (sic!) (sarcasm!)

you want proof of how amazingly "astute" you really are? very well, let me qoute your very, uhm "sensible" reply earlier.

"-Ang root cause ang nagpa inplement ug ang mga tawo nga wa nisunod." - for starters, the word is "implement", not inplement. LOL!

"Ang nag sunod ug nag Implementar sa instution maoy Root cause Dili ang Balaod." - say what?? institution? don't you mean "constitution? LOL!

the lawmakers & the people who follow them are the root cause & not the law itself?? LMAO! this is getting funnier & funnier!

"Pero if maayu ang implementation ug maayu ang nagsunod, Positive ghapon ang resulta." - how can it be positive when the constitution itself is already f*%#+d up? you're expecting positive results from the 1987 Philippine constitution? wow, that's a very sensible answer! LOL!

asenso kaayo ang Pinas kung tarungon lang pag-implement ang baluktot na systema!

Murag Brayt sad ka dah, Sorry sa Spelling Mr Genius.

Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago remains skeptical over moves to change the Constitution, but she will consider it if the amendments will dwell on preventing "idiots" from running for high posts in the government.

"My only caveat is, that once you decide to change the Constitution, you cannot by law, limit the change or amendment of the Constitution to just for a particular point," she said.

Santiago cited the opinions of the Supreme Court ruling that once Congress has made a decision to open the Charter to change, it cannot limit what a constitutional convention or constituent assembly can do.

"You cannot say just limit it economic provisions. That will go against the ratio of the cases decided by the Supreme Court. So if that’s going to happen, I generally do not want the Constitution to be amended so soon," she said.

She added that she is against changing the economic provisions for the sake of change.

Ang akong pangutana ani run is Since ikaw nag Ingun nga ang ROOT CAUSE mao ang Constitution.
If Root cause pa - NGANU Wa man nagdali si Meriam Santiago para mausab na?
Nganu wa man niya ipamugos nga usbon nga Para nimu ROOT CAUSE man kaha?
Sharu ROOT CAUSE nya Wala jud gipamugos ni Miriam? WALA siya kabalo sa imung nahibal-an?

Unya Kinsay may KAHIBALO ani run, Kinsay amung tuhuan - Ikaw nga Copy Paste or si Miriam Santiago?