Welcome Maxwell

[ruben17]

---

^265 is enough bro...

[harhar]

Bitaw paytira aning GTX 750 ti...

[regilsolon]

Palit Geforce GTX 750 StormX OC 1G GDDR5 128Bit
PHP 5900.00 <------------- tempting.... huhu

[wylliexhan]

This is the review GeForce GTX 750 Ti NVIDIA & ASUS Designs based on LinusTech
GeForce GTX 750 Ti NVIDIA & ASUS Designs - YouTube

[BrianBCBF]

no question about the performance/per watt ani nga card gtx 750ti, but since most of the card kai walai 6 pin.. dli kaau ni maau e OC... i'm much more excited sa r7-265, reports say its on par with gtx660 which is faster than 750ti.. then price aning r7-265 expected lower than 750ti. so AMD wins again in price/performance..

[ruben17]

^ naa naman reviews for 265. lower siya price compared to 750Ti

[lloyd_joy]

no question about the performance/per watt ani nga card gtx 750ti, but since most of the card kai walai 6 pin.. dli kaau ni maau e OC... i'm much more excited sa r7-265, reports say its on par with gtx660 which is faster than 750ti.. then price aning r7-265 expected lower than 750ti. so AMD wins again in price/performance..

if and OC percentage gain lang from the based core & mem frequency ang basinah, the GTX 750 Ti wins as what was seen by Techspot... But, pricewise, almost of the same price range ra sila... vote nako kay lower ang R7 265 ug actual price... unya, mas pas2x sya'g raw performance than the GTX 750 Ti... actual bill sa kuryente ani, dili kaayo dako man... dili man mag sige'g full load ang GPU for 24 hrs... so, over-all, better suited gyud ang R7 265 for a "gaming GPU" between the 2 choices.. but sa mga tao na limited ang chassis (akoang mini-ITX rig is a classis example), the snub nosed offering from the Green Team is very welcome... hehehehe... or, if ang power consumption sa whole rig ang 1st priotiry, no questions asked, its the Green Team's offering that's the winner...

quotes from the site, Tech spot...

if percentage OC boost over the factory preset setting lang ang basinhan, it would be Green Team's credit...
"We got an extra 26% out of the GM107 core as we hit 1290MHz from 1020MHz versus a 17% boost on the Radeon R7 265."

if price to performance and actual gaming fps ang basihan, aw, smoked ang GTX 760 Ti... the R7 265 is the winner bu a large margin...
"In spite of the GTX 750 Ti's efficiency gains, solid overclocking and low power requirements, it doesn't offer enough oomph compared to the R7 265 if both cards were to be sold at $150. We suspect most gamers would prefer a 10fps performance boost to a 40-watt power savings, especially in a price bracket where every frame counts -- though if that isn't the case for some reason, you can still expect playable performance in most of today's titles."


full write-up link...
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon R7 265 > And Best GPU at $150 Goes to... - TechSpot

[senpai91]

Upgrade ko karong summer bai, ilisan nako akong current rig (Pentium G630) to AMD 8320 build hehehe. Diri ko mag dugay nga build guro like 3-5 years.

Ikaw?

ako? stick to i5 3570k+6990 ug Phenom II 1090T+6970...mag 3 years nanang mga GPU nako asta ng Phenom II ang i5 ray murag bag-o dira..haha..murag lang

[lloyd_joy]

^ ngay, those GPU of yours are still kickin'... no need to change pa... not unless, ang actual fps nya sa current games, mura na'g 9400GT... hehehe... or gawas mag sige ta'g tan-aw'g benchmark numbers... dili man lagi na mag 24 hrs ug dagan ang rig @ full load, so, VECO bill wise, dili sakit... negligible ra's monthly budget... hehehe...

[Sempron Guy]

if and OC percentage gain lang from the based core & mem frequency ang basinah, the GTX 750 Ti wins as what was seen by Techspot... But, pricewise, almost of the same price range ra sila... vote nako kay lower ang R7 265 ug actual price... unya, mas pas2x sya'g raw performance than the GTX 750 Ti... actual bill sa kuryente ani, dili kaayo dako man... dili man mag sige'g full load ang GPU for 24 hrs... so, over-all, better suited gyud ang R7 265 for a "gaming GPU" between the 2 choices.. but sa mga tao na limited ang chassis (akoang mini-ITX rig is a classis example), the snub nosed offering from the Green Team is very welcome... hehehehe... or, if ang power consumption sa whole rig ang 1st priotiry, no questions asked, its the Green Team's offering that's the winner...

quotes from the site, Tech spot...

if percentage OC boost over the factory preset setting lang ang basinhan, it would be Green Team's credit...
"We got an extra 26% out of the GM107 core as we hit 1290MHz from 1020MHz versus a 17% boost on the Radeon R7 265."

if price to performance and actual gaming fps ang basihan, aw, smoked ang GTX 760 Ti... the R7 265 is the winner bu a large margin...
"In spite of the GTX 750 Ti's efficiency gains, solid overclocking and low power requirements, it doesn't offer enough oomph compared to the R7 265 if both cards were to be sold at $150. We suspect most gamers would prefer a 10fps performance boost to a 40-watt power savings, especially in a price bracket where every frame counts -- though if that isn't the case for some reason, you can still expect playable performance in most of today's titles."


full write-up link...
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon R7 265 > And Best GPU at $150 Goes to... - TechSpot

AMD actually did nothing there, ila ra gibutangan ug laing ngalan ang HD7850 dayon oc gamay, voila R7-265! hehe. And I agree on that quote "We suspect most gamers would prefer a 10fps performance boost to a 40-watt power savings, especially in a price bracket where every frame counts". Nice to have lang siguro ning 750 Ti labi na sakto kaayo ni sa akoang CM Elite 110 and wa nay hasol mag kabit pa ug extra cable para lang sa gpu. What's scary though is Nvidia's higher end line-up based on Maxwell. If they are able to squeeze in more performance within that power limit on a 28nm process. Imagine a GTX 770 caliber card that consumes around 100w . Akoang guess ani, AMD's response would be a Hawaii with a 22nm process. Or they would continue the norm, give less priority to power/performance and stick with price/performance where they are currently good at.