a question worthy of discussion? that depends on what you find is worthy of discussion, but for me any question is worthy of discussion. I dont see how i can present a question that for you is worthy of discussion because that criteria depends on what you fancy and what you deem as such..
I do hope your last sentence is correct.. and i do hope anybody would care to backread them..If its something that is so common , everyday , mediocre , so so topics and ideas that leads to become a question like general topics about the TRADITION , SCRIPTURES and MAGISTERIUM , INFALLIBILITY POPE , BVM ( Immaculate , being worshiped , different titles , etc ) , " REPEATED " PRAYERS" , " WORSHIPPING "SAINTS , MAGISTERIUM being ABSOLUTE, CATHECISM being ABSOLUTE, PRIEST ( Sacrament of HOly Orders and its powers including the Sacrament of Reconciliation ) , TITHES and the FINANCIAL STATUS of the church, SUICIDE( to be prayed over or not ) , NUNS , HOLY TRINITY , HISTORY of the RCC , BLESSED SACRAMENTS and its substance , the EUCHARISTIC MIRACLES etc ....save your energy .Most likely these has been answered and explained personally or within the confines of Catholic teachings supplied with reliable Catholic references .
If anyone feel tired of answering questions or does not like the questions presented here, they are not forced to answer.. if someone does answer the burden of proving the point belongs to him, i believe that's how it works..To give justice to what you said, dili lang ikaw ang naay limited time diri , we too have limited time yet we took the time and effort of answering and explaining most of the questions brought up to the table. Dont you think you and the rest should take the time and effort also of reading those answers and explanations ?
Kana inyohang mga questions intawn naa na sa basic CATHECISM ang answers oi .... unya lalison pa jud ? Mas mo bilib ko sa abilidad ninyo if you guys can come up a more challenging question. Dont you guys see the pattern of discrediting the RCC ? Mangutana mo ug questions then tubagon mo para ninyo sayop. WHy ask in the first place if kabalo mo sa sakto na tubag ?
ANything worthy of discussion simply put , a discussion intended to be tackled both parties with gusto and enthusiast. The one confused and the one who will do the explaining and answering. IN the absence of one , its not at all WORTHY of DISCUSSION . My thread , my sub forum , my house , my rules. Thats my definition of WORTHY DISCUSSION here unless you have something better than that worthy enough to be discussed that wont bore me for redundancy.
You still dont get it do you ? You cant challenge something that is confined to something . Why would you ask a question pertaining to RCC then a source would be provided from Protestant.org: The Leading Religion Site on the Net ?I do hope your last sentence is correct.. and i do hope anybody would care to backread them..
Anybody will backread ... that is a definite. After this reminder , I will be deleting threads that does not suit here nor something that pertains to discrediting on something that is established or maybe something that points the direction redundancy of question.
Not necessarily . And I dont like to keep on repeating myself. You know why ? It does not at all contribute intelligence when you talk about redundancy and rhetoric questions all the time.If anyone feel tired of answering questions or does not like the questions presented here, they are not forced to answer.. if someone does answer the burden of proving the point belongs to him, i believe that's how it works..
Feeling tired is the wrong description , rather it is not worthy of discussion anymore fits more the idea of such which I assume you thought of as me and the rest are avoiding.
After this post , I will be starting to delete post that are irrelevant and off topic. I want to see 1 question and 1 answer and keep on moving. Follow up answers are allowed but limit it as a question to further the information or by asking it to be expounded more rather than opposing the answer because you guys think you have a better explanation for it.
Other than that , back on track and stay on topic .... ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH QUESTIONS .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Let me throw my first question.. I honestly didn't back read because I'm very confident that this has not been asked before.
So here it is...
How does Roman Catholic handle when it comes its people choice especially when one's own Catholicism is in question due to a certain decision or POV? Say for example, the RH law.
one last question, after this i wont make anymore replies to this thread... Please everyone excuse me for asking something like this,.
If God tells you to kill one member of your family, would you do it?
Classic catholic teaching calls for
right motive --> right purpose or end --> right means or action
if one of these is wrong, everything else is wrong.
therefore you have to discern the spirit("God") based on these standards,
Even if it is really God who calls for it (which I doubt).
i believe the Church's stand on RH Law is against it but individual choice of each Catholic is respected.
therefore, one can be a Catholic while pro RH bill. although this is not ideal..and a direct contradiction of being a Catholic.
The Church promotes, guides and even encourages but does not impose..
one is free to make choices as God let us freely make our decisions.
but the effects of our actions are always inevitable of course..
in the Catholic perspective, abortion is a direct sin to God..
the Church does not force a Catholic to adhere to this point of view..
after all, it is the person who commit these acts will answer to God.
there is one thing to consider though, if one really considers him/herself as a Catholic, i believe one should give importance to the Church's point of view and reasons before considering to dismiss them for the sake of personal perspective.
Last edited by noy; 01-22-2014 at 12:33 AM.
Primary of conscience
The freedom to choose comes with the
heavy burden of choosing the right option.
Once we have chosen, we shall be held
accountable for the consequences.
There is no grey area even with the RH Law.
You have the freedom to damn your soul or save it.
Discern between the two options: one is good, the other is evil.
but remember the destiny of your soul is at stake.
Kini tubaga daw ko "Ngano atong mga prayers dili man ma answer?
These are your teaching in the bible, Its crystal clear in your teaching that when we pray daw "nothing is impossible".
Matthew 7:7
Matthew 17:20
Matthew 21:21
Mark 11:24
John 14:12-14
Matthew 18:19
James 5:15-16
Last edited by Nefarian; 01-22-2014 at 12:31 AM.
Similar Threads |
|