Comments on Former president NOYNOY AQUINO.

[Nefarian]

more like KAMONG MGA GIPANG-HEPA, ganahan mo nga ubos ra ang body count para dili maulawan inyong ginoong Aquino

i LAUGH at the people who are liking your post especially jack_bauer, the ultimate yellowtard here in Istorya who celebrated the low death count just a day after the typhoon and then credited it to his god Aquino

the President is in denial that one of the worst tragedies happened during his administration. he has no control on that.

HOWEVER what the KURIMAW could have controlled was the way the situation should have been handled AFTER the typhoon. instead of sending out immediate aid to the affected areas, he decided to wait first for the LGU's to act. it took him 3 THREE, TULO, TATLO days to realize the LGU's are disabled. it took him more than 5 FIVE, LIMA days for the relief to go on full blast og hangtud karon wa pa gihapon magkadi-amo og daghan gihapong kontrobersya.

he's so conscious about the body count that he made it a mission (a VERY DELUSIONAL one at that) to target zero casualty. he is so conscious about the body count that his STUPID SPOKESPERSON in Malacanang and also HERE IN ISTORYA celebrated and congratulated everyone and Aquino for the low body count. he is so conscious about the body count that he went extremely defensive in the CNN interview about it

nganong kailangan pa man itago tago ang mga numero, hadlok siyang maulaw siya?

ayaw gyud ninyog himoag rason nga para dili moubos ang morale sa taw kay MAMAKAK na lang ta. unsang klase na lang gyud ang pangutok sa mga ubang daw diri. you people have an EXTREME CASE OF AQUINO STRAIN of HEPATITIS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!!!!

Nahitabo ba ingon ani ka init ang issue sa body count ug wala pato gi report sa news ang 10K deaths? Ang gusto man gud ninyo nga masakto ang 10k mao ng pamugos jud mo. Paghuwat nga maabot ta diha.

And who the hell wants nga daghan patay? Ngano naka sulti ka nag celebrate sila nga gamay ra ang patay? Kay abi against sila sa imong opinion? UNSWA?

If you are so fond of Mr. COOPER, then you should know that he wants ACCURACY in reporting.

I ask you "Unsa may bakak nahitabo?"

Kay para nako ang problem is SLOW RESPONSE. Asa man ang bakak imo pasabot beh kay murag nalubag akong utok da.

[MtClimber]

Nahitabo ba ingon ani ka init ang issue sa body count ug wala pato gi report sa news ang 10K deaths? Ang gusto man gud ninyo nga masakto ang 10k mao ng pamugos jud mo. Paghuwat nga maabot ta diha.

And who the hell wants dead people? Ngano naka sulti ka nag celebrate sila nga gamay ra ang patay? Kay abi against sila sa imong opinion? UNSWA?

If you are so fond of Mr. COOPER. then you should know that he wants ACCURACY in reporting.

That was just an estimate sa officer nga naa sa nahitaboan.

Why man gi relieved nya ang officer nga naghatag ug estimate, proven na nga sayop na jud diay ang officer sa iyang bana2x? Nya karon kay nilapas man sab sa iyang estimate, tangtangon sab na sa iyang pwesto?

Og ang dakong pangutana, why man hunongon ang count?

[MtClimber]

Ang nakabati lang diri nga thread kay if mo criticize ka sa current govt., ingnon ka binayran.

Ang mga critics sab di moangkon nga binayran bisag klaro sab jud kaau, heheh. Klaro kaau nang ubang mga critics diha binayran sa ilang employer and/or own business while nag istorya.net

Ang mo like ani nga post, BINAYRAN!

[Nefarian]

Ang nakabati lang diri nga thread kay if mo criticize ka sa current govt., ingnon ka binayran.

Ang mga critics sab di moangkon nga binayran bisag klaro sab jud kaau, heheh. Klaro kaau nang ubang mga critics diha binayran sa ilang employer and/or own business while nag istorya.net

Ang mo like ani nga post, BINAYRAN!

Mao sad na akong ganahan mahitabo kanang mabayran ko. Maynalang maka kwarta ta hehe.

[jack_bauer_v2]

Ang nakabati lang diri nga thread kay if mo criticize ka sa current govt., ingnon ka binayran.

Ang mga critics sab di moangkon nga binayran bisag klaro sab jud kaau, heheh. Klaro kaau nang ubang mga critics diha binayran sa ilang employer and/or own business while nag istorya.net

Ang mo like ani nga post, BINAYRAN!

kaysa imong cgehan ug usik imong oras mg istorya.. maypa magpa bayad nlang sd ka... hahahaha

- - - Updated - - -

more like KAMONG MGA GIPANG-HEPA, ganahan mo nga ubos ra ang body count para dili maulawan inyong ginoong Aquino

i LAUGH at the people who are liking your post especially jack_bauer, the ultimate yellowtard here in Istorya who celebrated the low death count just a day after the typhoon and then credited it to his god Aquino

the President is in denial that one of the worst tragedies happened during his administration. he has no control on that.

HOWEVER what the KURIMAW could have controlled was the way the situation should have been handled AFTER the typhoon. instead of sending out immediate aid to the affected areas, he decided to wait first for the LGU's to act. it took him 3 THREE, TULO, TATLO days to realize the LGU's are disabled. it took him more than 5 FIVE, LIMA days for the relief to go on full blast og hangtud karon wa pa gihapon magkadi-amo og daghan gihapong kontrobersya.

he's so conscious about the body count that he made it a mission (a VERY DELUSIONAL one at that) to target zero casualty. he is so conscious about the body count that his STUPID SPOKESPERSON in Malacanang and also HERE IN ISTORYA celebrated and congratulated everyone and Aquino for the low body count. he is so conscious about the body count that he went extremely defensive in the CNN interview about it

nganong kailangan pa man itago tago ang mga numero, hadlok siyang maulaw siya? kung naa siyay dapat kaulawan dili ang numero oy! dapat maulaw siya sa pagkaYAYA sa iyang gobyerno morespond sa mga ingon ani nga calamity. dapat maulaw siya sa iyang kaugalingon nga klaro kaayong IMAHE lang niya ang gihuna-huna mao nang NUMERO UNO siyang kusog mo blame og laing tawo

ayaw gyud ninyog himoag rason nga para dili moubos ang morale sa tawo kay MAMAKAK na lang ta. unsang klase na lang gyud ang pangutok sa mga ubang tawo diri. you people have an EXTREME CASE OF AQUINO STRAIN of HEPATITIS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!!!!

Mas retarded pka.. ngano di man gyud ka mka dawat nga ang goberno ni respond dayon ASAP.. less than 24 hours.. ngano man gyud dili ka mka dawat ana?

kinsa may retarded rn, ako o ikaw nga di lanh gyud kadawat nga ni tubag ang goberno sa kalamidad..

its just that its beyond its control.. hahahahahaha

[carmicael]

the spoiler contains a text wall. i can't believe i'm stooping down so low.

Spoiler! 

basta green colored masayop gyud ug sabot.

move on. election 2010 was 3 years ago.

use deductive reasoning para imong ma sabtan akong buot ipa ibot.

[TIMELINE OF EVENTS]
[1]-some post about "SWS Survey"

[2]refutation about "SWS" credibility.

[3]an off-the-mark reply "pero ang business community ni tuo sa ilang resulta."

[4]point of order: reply does not answer main point

[5]broken english and nervous laughter: "you should know, the kind of business SWS is threading(sic) requires and needs credibility than anyone here does.. hehe" (conclusion from broken english: the kind of business SWS is involved in requires credibility)

[6]asking for basis of credibility aside from "it is required due to the nature of business".

[7]lying about not saying something: "im not saying kaelangan sa business. im saying the business is patronizing it." (see item [5] in timeline).

[8]pointing out the said lie.

[9]some snarly remark about "deductive reasoning" and whatnot.

who wouldn't get confused? apart from broken english and incoherent thoughts, you offer me nothing. well, nothing except ad hominem comments.

ingon ko the kind of business sws is having requires credibility.

precisely my point when i said "unsay basis nimo sa credibility sa SWS aside from 'kelangan siya sa business'? layo kaayo sa main point. try again."

then you had the gall to say "im not saying kaelangan sa business. im saying the business is patronizing it."

ingon sd ko the fact nga naay continued use of sws data is proof nga credible sila.

but, i digress. time for the meat of the matter. this is not proof of credibility. this is proof of usefulness. it is useful for people who commission these surveys because it indicates performance in order for them to show off. it is far from credible because these surveys are conducted using questionnaires. and, if you went to college, as you would have us here believe, you would know that surveys are subject to response bias and can be made with leading questions. these factors make the results questionable, at best.

kay abi international, credible na dayon? haha

this does not prove the credibility of SWS. but unlike you, i have reasons to strongly believe that the international food policy research institute is credible.

[1]documentation of the process and results. refer to http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/f...ions/ghi13.pdf

[2]actual raw data. refer to GHI Data | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

"The GHI scores are based on source data that are continually revised by the United Nations agencies responsible for their compilation, and each year’s GHI report reflects these revisions. While these revisions result in improvements in the data, they also mean that the GHI scores from different years’ reports are not comparable with one another. This year’s report contains GHI scores for four other reference periods—1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005—besides the most recent GHI, and so expands the scope of the trend analyses in comparison with previous reports."

[3]no vested interests. (what will they gain by lying?)

United Nations method vs SWS method. just from a technological perspective, it is clear which of those two are more credible. it's simple, really.

---

it was fun the first few times "debating" about SWS. but as time presses on, your answers become less educated and more gibberish. i had the courtesy to answer you coherently and comprehensively. if you were really educated as you had said you were, you would have extended me the same.

i no longer need you to answer this post. thank you for proving my point.

[jack_bauer_v2]

di mo ma ulaw sa atong military...

You are the ones caring for victims who need first aid, you are the ones hauling the sacks of rice that need to be brought to affected communities, you are the companions of families who needs someone to lean on, to guide them as they learn to stand on their own feet once again and turn their backs on the nightmare of this tragedy,” he said.

“At times like this, there is no room for you to doubt what you have done because you know that your countrymen need you, you must not let them down.”

-gazmin

- - - Updated - - -

the spoiler contains a text wall. i can't believe i'm stooping down so low.

Spoiler! 

move on. election 2010 was 3 years ago.


[TIMELINE OF EVENTS]
[1]-some post about "SWS Survey"

[2]refutation about "SWS" credibility.

[3]an off-the-mark reply "pero ang business community ni tuo sa ilang resulta."

[4]point of order: reply does not answer main point

[5]broken english and nervous laughter: "you should know, the kind of business SWS is threading(sic) requires and needs credibility than anyone here does.. hehe" (conclusion from broken english: the kind of business SWS is involved in requires credibility)

[6]asking for basis of credibility aside from "it is required due to the nature of business".

[7]lying about not saying something: "im not saying kaelangan sa business. im saying the business is patronizing it." (see item [5] in timeline).

[8]pointing out the said lie.

[9]some snarly remark about "deductive reasoning" and whatnot.

who wouldn't get confused? apart from broken english and incoherent thoughts, you offer me nothing. well, nothing except ad hominem comments.

precisely my point when i said "unsay basis nimo sa credibility sa SWS aside from 'kelangan siya sa business'? layo kaayo sa main point. try again."

then you had the gall to say "im not saying kaelangan sa business. im saying the business is patronizing it."


but, i digress. time for the meat of the matter. this is not proof of credibility. this is proof of usefulness. it is useful for people who commission these surveys because it indicates performance in order for them to show off. it is far from credible because these surveys are conducted using questionnaires. and, if you went to college, as you would have us here believe, you would know that surveys are subject to response bias and can be made with leading questions. these factors make the results questionable, at best.


this does not prove the credibility of SWS. but unlike you, i have reasons to strongly believe that the international food policy research institute is credible.

[1]documentation of the process and results. refer to http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/f...ions/ghi13.pdf

[2]actual raw data. refer to GHI Data | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

"The GHI scores are based on source data that are continually revised by the United Nations agencies responsible for their compilation, and each year’s GHI report reflects these revisions. While these revisions result in improvements in the data, they also mean that the GHI scores from different years’ reports are not comparable with one another. This year’s report contains GHI scores for four other reference periods—1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005—besides the most recent GHI, and so expands the scope of the trend analyses in comparison with previous reports."

[3]no vested interests. (what will they gain by lying?)

United Nations method vs SWS method. just from a technological perspective, it is clear which of those two are more credible. it's simple, really.

---

it was fun the first few times "debating" about SWS. but as time presses on, your answers become less educated and more gibberish. i had the courtesy to answer you coherently and comprehensively. if you were really educated as you had said you were, you would have extended me the same.

i no longer need you to answer this post. thank you for proving my point.

geez... hahaha

because all you know of SWS surveys are the ones being given for free.

should you become privy of private businessess asking SWS to do market research.. mauwaw cguro kas imong g.sulti... hahaha

[CocoCrunch]

What we need are stories of inspirations and human strength during desperate and trying times. That gives them some glint of hope and the reason to live.

Telling UNVERIFIED deaths will only makes things worse. I don't know why you can't understand this. Mas ganahan guro mo maabot ug 10k ang patay aron ma sakto mo diri? Unya ug sakto mo malipay mo?

what inspirational stories do you mean? geng, you are aware and you saw how desperate those people are right? tell them your inspirational stories and lets see if they'll listen to you.

how could it make worse? have you seen the pics and vids of leyte? i cant believe ingon ana ra ka gamay ang casualties. ilang naapil ang naanod sa dagat?? im sure naay natabunan sa debris and ang uban kay gilubong nlang kay baho na kaayo. dili sa ganahan mi maabot ang 10k mark but obviously naabot jud ang 10k or nalapas na.

[Nefarian]

what inspirational stories do you mean? geng, you are aware and you saw how desperate those people are right? tell them your inspirational stories and lets see if they'll listen to you.

how could it make worse? have you seen the pics and vids of leyte? i cant believe ingon ana ra ka gamay ang casualties. ilang naapil ang naanod sa dagat?? im sure naay natabunan sa debris and ang uban kay gilubong nlang kay baho na kaayo. dili sa ganahan mi maabot ang 10k mark but obviously naabot jud ang 10k or nalapas na.

Kita man guro ka sa news brad kanang mga inspirational writings sa wall na gipangbuhat mismo sa mga survivors.

Ug bahin sad anang dead counts dili lagi ta magpa madam auring style nga mag guess2x. Maabot rata diha unsa may dalian nimo.

Atat lagi ka mahimong 10k sa?

[amingb]

1,461 days since Maguindanao massacre | Inquirer News

Grabiha sa mga 5 Yers naman siguro hangtod karon wala pamay na convicto .. ka remember ko sa ABS-CBN ani nag countdown sila pero pag sugod sa Pnoy Admin ning undang ug Countdown ....