Sang ayon ba mo na ma-impeach si Pangulong Aquino?

[Scott Bernard]

---

Let's support the lesser evil and punish the greatest evil in our society.

[frust]

No
I didn't vote for him but I still have faith in goodness.
All I want is for him to get rid of those corrupt officials under his wings like he's trying to do with some from the opposition.
He's the famous one after all.
If wants to stay in his seat then I think he should weigh who's staying with him.

[tumbs]

Daghan tao loyal sa Abnoy kay di kuno corrupt, pero kung imo pangutan-on unsa ilang proof & facts na di corrupt ilang Abnoy, di katubag!!!!!!!! hahahahahahaa puro mga motherhood statements!!!!!! paila lang unsa sila kamabaw ug utok!!! liwat sa ilang idol!!!!

[sammedriano]

Dah, usik-usik lang sa money sa Government. Then, provided nga ma impeach, who's next? Another kurakot? Hahaizt

[peewee_toot]

nya kung ma impeach.. ang mopuli?......

kung ma impeach c noy2x ky sala gihapon na ni gloria.

[lecreigh]

im not noy's fan... pero i dont think impeachment is the answer..
punish whoever needs to be punished. if pwede pa ma recover (or ma refund, haha! i wish), go ahead.
then make some clear policies and guidelines regarding the funds collected from the people.. hahai.
atong tax intawn.. kapoi pa kaug trabaho, sila moy nangadato... paets.

[Nefarian]

Just a random statement from an article.

"You know, asking the President to scrap his own discretionary funds is politically motivated. They dont see the good intention of the President in spending these amounts to good use. Politicians especially on the opposition side are insecure of the money in the hands of the President. Since the lawmakers are to give up their PDAF they want the same to the President. But you see there is a big difference between the lawmakers and the President. The lawmakers main function is to debate and to craft laws. The Executive function is to deliver and implement projects. The lawmakers "executive"function in PDAF for their chosen projects is only a sideline to their main function which is lawmaking. It will not hurt if their "executive"function be clipped.

But to say that the President should altogether scrapped his discretionary funds is to render inutile the Executive in performing its functions. The President is the manager. He has to have access to the funds anytime. How can you manage a corporation when your hands are tied? The manager cannot always go to the Board of Directors to ask money to fund the day to day and emergency needs of the company. It has to have funds."

A PRESIDENT WITHOUT BUDGET? THEN BETTER ABOLISH THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT.

WHAT WE NEED IS TRANSPARENCY IN THE PRESIDENT'S SPENDING NOT ABOLISHING. AT LEAST THIS WAY ONLY ONE PERSON IS LIABLE.

******

The deal is still open.

[johnjob]

sayop ka boss .... dili 50 million ... tag 100 million na tingali iyang ihatag hehehe

sayop jud mo boss 100M plus yellow jacket with rulers logo ("Oligarchy")..

[bejabbers]

ironic kaayo sah kung mag edsa revolution mga tao against pnoy. ka uwaw tingale ana sah? ako di lang ko uyon ma i.impeach si pnoy kay nganu? hapit na man mo expire iyang seat, if mo out siya karon agi na pud ta ug lain nga president for a short time then election na pud lain na pud nga president. gubot.an lng ko

[alwaysdrunk]

impeach si opao ipuli ang lagom.....
i-impeach napud ang lagom kay wa malipay ang taga facebook
i-impeach napud dayon ang mo sunod kay wa malipay ang taga twitter
i-impeach napud ang sunod kay wa malipay ang taga istorya

saon nalang nato ni mga brad try gani mo bisita sa international news naa pay worse nato ug kahimtang in terms of corruption. tan awa gani ang Somalia, maygani ta dre ka aford pa tag post post dre sa net sila twn didto ila mga bata gilangaw na bisan buhi pa tungod sa ka pobre gira dre gira didto. kita dre puros reklamo hahay.