PAREF-Springdale against single parents or OFWs?

[Attempt-Fight-Gear]

---

Dili ni siya issue. Kitang tanan naa tay own stand on things, including kanang pagka single parent.

Unsa mang unfair ana nga dili sila modawat ug child from a single parent? They are entitled to their school policy. Ang unfair kanang pugson ang tanang tao nga okay ra ang single parent. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion as long as wala ta naka violate sa Law.

Basin na violate ang constitutional right sa bata nga FREEDOM of education.

Section 1. The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels, and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.

[THE KID]

Basin na violate ang constitutional right sa bata nga FREEDOM of education.

Section 1. The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels, and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.

ang akong interpretation ani sir nga ang government kinahanglan/oblige mo provide og education sa bata..mao ning naa tay public school system / "free" basic education/tertiary education.... dili nga ang bata naa right nga mo pili og asa siya mo skwela specially sa private schools...

[Attempt-Fight-Gear]

ang akong interpretation ani sir nga ang government kinahanglan/oblige mo provide og education sa bata..mao ning naa tay public school system / "free" basic education/tertiary education.... dili nga ang bata naa right nga mo pili og asa siya mo skwela specially sa private schools...

Section 4.(1) The State recognizes the complementary roles of public and private institutions in the educational system and shall exercise reasonable supervision and regulation of all educational institutions.

- - - Updated - - -

Sec. 2. Coverage. — This Act shall apply to and govern both formal and non-formal systems in public and private schools in all levels of the entire educational system.

The State shall promote the right of every individual to relevant quality education, regardless of ***, age, creed, socio-economic status, physical and mental conditions, racial or ethnic origin, political or other affiliation. The State shall therefore promote and maintain equality of access to education as well as the enjoyment of the benefits of education by all its citizens.

[Hammer_and_Sickle]

^kahebaw ka bai, bright kaayu ka bilib kaayu ko nimo....sakto mn ka, ka apan lang, constitution mn gud na

"non self executing provision" mn na imong gi cite, na provision sa constitution, meaning, kaylangan na ug "law" para ma buhi na na provision,..actually, almost tanan provision sa constitution kay non self executing provisions, gamay ra kaayu ang self executing..

so please, ayaw na lang ug ipa mugos, na adunay fault nang wala'y kwenta na springdale, it's just business, purely business

[TheSunKing]

Section 4.(1) The State recognizes the complementary roles of public and private institutions in the educational system and shall exercise reasonable supervision and regulation of all educational institutions.

- - - Updated - - -

Sec. 2. Coverage. — This Act shall apply to and govern both formal and non-formal systems in public and private schools in all levels of the entire educational system.

The State shall promote the right of every individual to relevant quality education, regardless of ***, age, creed, socio-economic status, physical and mental conditions, racial or ethnic origin, political or other affiliation. The State shall therefore promote and maintain equality of access to education as well as the enjoyment of the benefits of education by all its citizens.

Sir,

This is only applicable to the public school system. Even if you complain to DepEd about this, you will be referred to the nearest public school for your child's education. The school would only be obliged IF there is NO PUBLIC SCHOOL in your locality. If wala'y public school within Cebu City, then DepEd might grant your wish.

You cant bend the principles of the private school for your own sake. Each school has its own technical requirements for accepting students -- and for this school, they place great important on family background especially marriage of the parents. When you check their website, it is one of the technical requirements.

In the same way, if a girl would enroll in an exclusive boys' school, can they accuse the school of gender discrimination?


Off topic:

Your argument would lead to a lot of abuses. For example, I want my child to study in an expensive exclusive school. But I don't have the capability to shoulder the tuition. However, I want to evoke the right to quality education, regardless of socio-economic status. Can I sue them if they wont accept my child because I cant afford the tuition?

- - - Updated - - -

unsaon nlng ang mga widow? they are also considered single parent dba?

I think, buot pasabot ani is unmarried parents.

[Attempt-Fight-Gear]

im just referring to kung unsa gipasabot ni TS................kung ngano na feel niya nga murag unfair if dle madawat iyang anak maski mka AFFORD pa cxa.......

so try gani basa sa taas...i said "maybe feel ni TS na violate ang consti right sa bata.

- - - Updated - - -

^kahebaw ka bai, bright kaayu ka bilib kaayu ko nimo....sakto mn ka, ka apan lang, constitution mn gud na

"non self executing provision" mn na imong gi cite, na provision sa constitution, meaning, kaylangan na ug "law" para ma buhi na na provision,..actually, almost tanan provision sa constitution kay non self executing provisions, gamay ra kaayu ang self executing..

so please, ayaw na lang ug ipa mugos, na adunay fault nang wala'y kwenta na springdale, it's just business, purely business

bai...wala mai gipa mugos ani. if mo basa ka sa thread before ka mag comment...its not about kung duna bai kwenta o wala ang sprindale....

its about sa na feel ni TS ngano unfair na nga school.........so i said (basaha sa kaw) " maybe or Basin na violate ang constitutional right sa bata nga FREEDOM of education..................

nabasa na nimo brad. wa manko nag hambug bright...bright..o unsa pana. so next time basaha sa ha......


***kuyawa aning mga law students noh....dretso man comment ug inisog....hahaha....delikado ug mka pasar...mo dako ang ulo.

[Attempt-Fight-Gear]

^kahebaw ka bai, bright kaayu ka bilib kaayu ko nimo....sakto mn ka, ka apan lang, constitution mn gud na

"non self executing provision" mn na imong gi cite, na provision sa constitution, meaning, kaylangan na ug "law" para ma buhi na na provision,..actually, almost tanan provision sa constitution kay non self executing provisions, gamay ra kaayu ang self executing..

so please, ayaw na lang ug ipa mugos, na adunay fault nang wala'y kwenta na springdale, it's just business, purely business

DID YOU KNOW THAT THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ARE PRESUMED SELF-EXECUTING....? (TUBAGA KO)

AS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN MANILA, PRINCE HOTEL VS GOVERNMENT INSURANCE SYSTEM 267SCRA 408(1997) ( (tun-e na dong ha, para mka answer ka inig exam nimo) EN BANC, " A PROVISION WHICH IS COMPLETE BY ITSELF AND BECOMES OPERATIVE WITHOUT THE AID OF SUPPLEMENTARY OR ENABLING LEGISLATION OR THAT WHICH SUPPLIES SUFFICIENT RULE OF MEANS BY WHICH THE RIGHT IT GRANTS MAY BE ENJOYED OR PROTECTED...IS SELF-EXECUTING.

***e ask ni sa imo teacher dong ha......di ba ingon ko nimo nga basa lagi daan before UKAB imo dako na mouth.

thus, a constitutional provision is self-executing.

but then again...bright student man diay ka(hambugero gud manulti).......di ba ang bright student...mangutana mana sa iya teacher?

go ahead...ask ur lawyer teachers!!!!

[rans23]

descrimination against fellow Filipino. wala natay mahimo kay religious based man diay ning eskwelahana.

[Hammer_and_Sickle]

DID YOU KNOW THAT THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ARE PRESUMED SELF-EXECUTING....? (TUBAGA KO)

AS DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN MANILA, PRINCE HOTEL VS GOVERNMENT INSURANCE SYSTEM 267SCRA 408(1997) ( (tun-e na dong ha, para mka answer ka inig exam nimo) EN BANC, " A PROVISION WHICH IS COMPLETE BY ITSELF AND BECOMES OPERATIVE WITHOUT THE AID OF SUPPLEMENTARY OR ENABLING LEGISLATION OR THAT WHICH SUPPLIES SUFFICIENT RULE OF MEANS BY WHICH THE RIGHT IT GRANTS MAY BE ENJOYED OR PROTECTED...IS SELF-EXECUTING.

***e ask ni sa imo teacher dong ha......di ba ingon ko nimo nga basa lagi daan before UKAB imo dako na mouth.

thus, a constitutional provision is self-executing.

but then again...bright student man diay ka(hambugero gud manulti).......di ba ang bright student...mangutana mana sa iya teacher?

go ahead...ask ur lawyer teachers!!!!

ang kanang ge cite nimo na case bai, ge resolve ang question na.."whether or not, is the 1987 constitution is deemed in every contract?"

ang answer ka'y:YES, deemed in every contract..hehehehe

pero, ang question, if all the provisions in constitution are self executing?

answer: no, because the constitution says so

ang kanang naa sa article II sa constitution, mga non self executing na,

ang decision (manila prince hotle vs gsis )sa SC is not a law, rather it will only form part of the legal system, it has the same effect of a law, but it is not a law, for if it is a law, then the SC can legislate law, which is against the constitution,..so, basahon gyud nimo pag ayu ang ilang decision bai, para de ka ma-tae tingale'g obiter dictum imong na sight, ma disbar gyud ka ana,.

para ma klaro gyud nimo, try to question your lawyer professors, kanang political law expert na lawyer...try to ask, if self executing ba ng article II..tanan provision

kapoy mn gud ko explain ug cite ug mga provisions. labad sa ulo

wala ko'y lawyer professors bai, tamby ra tawn ko, surfer sa net,..hehehehehe

[Attempt-Fight-Gear]

......................................DP