US forces 'ready to strike Syria'

[M.A.D.]

---

Hmm... the ubiquitous Tomahawk... yes the range is really high but tomahawk is slow compared to the current supersonic missiles of Russia. Tomahawks have been shot down before. At $1.4 million a pop, the US should make sure every strike counts. So far all the sorties involving tomahawks only concern adversaries that don't have the operational capability to counter them.

By the way that is still more expensive compared to their Russian supersonic/hypersonic counterparts. As for the US, they still don't have a supersonic missile since the Phoenix which was already retired. The US does not seem to be focusing on advanced missile technology compared to the Russians and Chinese.

Maybe we will finally get to see the F-22 in action this time to counter these SAM systems. It would really hurt the US even if one F-22 Raptor gets shot down, I could imagine how embarrassing that would be and not to mention how costly that would be for the US.

[pak88]

+1 to that.Nganu kaha uban tao mag huna2x nga ang solution ani kay gubat man gyud?

dili pwede iinvestigate sah sa UN unsa jud nahitabo or ipa agi man lang ug diplomatic means?

Bitaw independent investigation before any action. Basin giluto na sad ni ebidensya like katong sa Iraq.

[flanker]

Hmm... the ubiquitous Tomahawk... yes the range is really high but tomahawk is slow compared to the current supersonic missiles of Russia. Tomahawks have been shot down before. At $1.4 million a pop, the US should make sure every strike counts. So far all the sorties involving tomahawks only concern adversaries that don't have the operational capability to counter them.

By the way that is still more expensive compared to their Russian supersonic/hypersonic counterparts. As for the US, they still don't have a supersonic missile since the Phoenix which was already retired. The US does not seem to be focusing on advanced missile technology compared to the Russians and Chinese.

Maybe we will finally get to see the F-22 in action this time to counter these SAM systems. It would really hurt the US even if one F-22 Raptor gets shot down, I could imagine how embarrassing that would be and not to mention how costly that would be for the US.

As much as possible the US wont enter Syrian airspace to avoid getting shot down. F22 is designed for air superiority and its ground attack capabilities are just basic. It means it needs to enter Syrian airspace in order to get a shot. Unlike F15 Eagle E, will just fly outside of the Syrian Airspace and fire a long range missile to hit the target.

But the likely scenario really if ever the US attacks is by tomahawk cruise missiles ( or even B2 Bomber 1 sortie)

It would be Tomahawk vs Pantsir S1 + Buk M2

[Kristiano]

simbako mahitabo ni....

but on the other side, the Warlords or the Weapons Dealers are ready to smile if this happens...

[M.A.D.]

If there is any SA300 or other advanced anti air systems then a F-22 would be required. But maybe they don't need to establish a no-fly-zone in the area because it's just too risky.

Cost vs. cost the US is still in the losing end.

As much as possible the US wont enter Syrian airspace to avoid getting shot down. F22 is designed for air superiority and its ground attack capabilities are just basic. It means it needs to enter Syrian airspace in order to get a shot. Unlike F15 Eagle E, will just fly outside of the Syrian Airspace and fire a long range missile to hit the target.

But the likely scenario really if ever the US attacks is by tomahawk cruise missiles ( or even B2 Bomber 1 sortie)

It would be Tomahawk vs Pantsir S1 + Buk M2

[JcBoY]

ONE DOWN...

LiveLeak.com - A U.S. F-22 Raptor jet crashed above the sky of northern Jordan.

[M.A.D.]

Hmm... too soon to tell. But Russian missile technology is definitely ahead of US missile tech.

ONE DOWN...

LiveLeak.com - A U.S. F-22 Raptor jet crashed above the sky of northern Jordan.

[Gharid]

this could be true..


Pentagon staged chemical attack in Syria - Pastebin.com


I've hacked colonel Anthony Jamie MacDonald mail he is intelligence US Army Staff boss. First I hacked his Link3dIn account and got access to his mail through it then.

Among mail Mayhem like Amazon mails I've found his correspondence with his colleague Eugene Furst. He congratulates Col. with success and gives a link to the Washington Post publication about chemical attack in Syria on August 21. Furst also mentions it was “well staged”. Holy shit. I was shocked my eyes refused to believe it. Bloody bastards they “staged” a chemical attack.

Then a friend of Anthony MacDonald's wife Jennifer writes she was shocked seeing on TV the children died after chemical attack in Syria. Jennifer answers she saw the story but Tony calm her down saying children were alive and the scene was staged.

Two best mails I uploaded here

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3g8rt2l3do33pgr/the-best.rar
the-best.rar
DepositFiles

Here you can download MacDonald's mail

https://www.dropbox.com/s/736xsoir8p...dnlds-l3ak.rar
DepositFiles
mcdnlds-l3ak.rar

Here is his wife's correspondence

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8jeqc5lm8w720kb/mary-leak.rar
mary-leak.rar
DepositFiles

I also hacked other Pentagon officers' mail boxes:

Evans, Anthony O COL USARMY HQDA ASA ALT (US)
Sims, John D COL USARMY HQDA OCPA (US)
Griffith, David M COL USARMY (US)
Bell, Craig A COL USARMY (US)
Parramore, David J (Dave) COL USARMY MEDCOM HQ (US)
Morris, Daniel L COL USARMY (US)
Ellison, Brenda K COL USARMY (US)
Jennings, Wesley J COL USARMY HQDA DCS G-8 (US)
Eberle, Brian K COL USARMY HQDA DCS G-3-5-7 (US)
Bradsher, John M COL USARMY (US)
Fish, Charles A COL USARMY JS J8 (US)
Roquemore, Darlene M COL USAF (US)
Mott, Robert L Jr COL USARMY HQDA OTSG (US)
Parramore, David J (Dave) COL USARMY MEDCOM HQ (US)
Weeks, Colin A LTC USARMY (US)
Reynolds, M Bridget LTC USARMY HQDA DCS G-2 (US)
Grahek, Christopher J LTC USARMY HQDA OTSG (US)
Henderson, Valerie D LTC USARMY HQDA OCPA (US)

I've no time to look through all their mails. A lot of shit to be sure there.
I will upload their correspondence later.

€Wagn3r

[Gharid]

Military Members Speak Out Against Syrian War Through Anonymous Meme - Liberty Crier

[pak88]

Hmm... too soon to tell. But Russian missile technology is definitely ahead of US missile tech.

There is no way that Russian missile technology is more advanced than that of the U.S. Look at the last two wars it fought, in Chechnya and Georgia. It still relies on terror bombing of entire cities and civilians just like in the last World War.

The highly touted S-300, if Syria has it, was developed in the 1970's. The U.S. already has possession of these missiles from former Eastern European nations and has incorporated the threat into the design into their aircraft.

The U.S. has moved away from supersonic missiles because of the high precision afforded by the Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are difficult to intercept. Supersonic missiles have to gain a high altitude which make them easier to be intercepted by modern anti-ballistic missile systems. Cruise missiles are difficult to intercept because they are low flying and is difficult to be detected until it is too late.