^ AMD's offering usually faster than Nvidia's offering on high AA and on very high resolutions (more than 1080p)... that is mainly due to the higher mem bandwidth that AMD offers... but the average gamer or most of the gamer can not identify image quality above 4XMSAA or equivalent.... by the way, Nvidia's TXAA (lighter than MSAA during GPUs processing) have an image quality that is very comparable to its MSAA counterpart...
also, on the desktop/gaming GPU, AMD's offering is much more powerful in computational power than Nvidia's... granting, they are targeted on the same class... due to their higher numbers of Stream Processing cores...
for brute gaming power, generally, Nvidia's offering usually is faster (but not all the time)... with the exemption of those games that will be on very high AA w/c is reserved for benckmarking or very high resolutions... the average gamer can not utilize this capabilty of the AMD's card since, the usual monitor used is 1920 x 1080... this is true for now, but will step up into the next level in the coming months or years as technology improves... (mag ready napud ta for the upgrades if mag sunod gyud ta aning technology... gasto again... gggrrrrr...)... this is a fact man in this passion of ours... so, cherrs... hehehehe...
in the electronics industry as well as in the software industry... the Companies "must" innovate... or die... competition is brutally fierce in this industries...



Reply With Quote


