Aquino wants Arroyo, other 'big fish' jailed - report

[redemption32]

---

Maproblemado dyud ang Presidente
ini.

Hasta si Noynoy kay naguol ni Apollo24. . . .

[Apollo24]

Actually Sir Apollo24, ni ingon ra jud ka nga gipriso si GMA kay lig-on ang ebidensya.. Wa jud ka nag-ingon nga gipriso siya kay non-bailable offense na...

Mao paman pagsulti nimu ana pag mention ni monroy.. Nangopya raka yadz?

OT: sori mods need to clarify this things out.... Ayaw ug pataka Bro.... Kahibaw ka mobasa? Backread daw.... Dili kay pataka lang ka ug karga... I hope mods i regulate ni nimo ang pataka ug karga without basing sa original comment.... Basaha balik, naghisgot ko ug non-bailable offense ang ka GMA kay yesterday 4:13pm ang ka Monroy kay 7:39pm... ikaw mods kinsay nagpataka namo?

[Apollo24]

Her detention has nothing to do with the evidence against her being strong. It just means the prima facie evidence is sufficient to go to trial, that's all. It doesn't mean its strong enough to secure conviction. Only a full trial can determine if the evidence is strong enough or not, otherwise she'd already be convicted.

Ni respond raman ko sa pamutana kung kinsay bogo. Ayaw na ko apila kai way hinungdan ning lalisa...

OT: sori Mods for OT... I hope e regulate ni nimo ang magsige ug karga2x... Without weighing the reasons on both sides.....

I think bogo si Apollo. LOL...

Nganong nag-apil2x man sad ka in the first place.... Tagaan taka ug laing example Bro ha ngano ang ebidensya kinahanglan palig-onon una... Kana kang Radaza bisan ug klaro na kaayo na overprice ang Lampost pero nakita sa Sandiganbayan na kulang ang mga ebedinsya sa Ombodsman mao to gi dismiss... Pero gipalig-on daw sa ombodsman aron e re-file... Ang kang Gwen Garcia, nakita sa Ombudsman na lig-on ang ebidensya mao to gipasaka sa Sandiganbayan... Tungod sa Due Process na it takes time before ma resolve mao na wala pa mapriso si Gwen Garcia... Naa pa siyay mga sked na trials... Wla pa prisoha si Gwen.. Prehas na ang ka GMA ug kang Gwen Garcia mga non- bailable offense.... After sa Sandiganbayan naa nasad laen...Nakita nimo ang process from the start to finish?

[Apollo24]

Maproblemado dyud ang Presidente
ini.

Problema tawn si Pnoy ninyo.. Bisan sa mga kalamboan na nahitabo... Abnoy lang gihapon ang tawag ninyo niya.. Ang mga Bad News pa gyud ang inyong gipangita..... Move on nalang mo ug sunod nalang mo sa Tuwid na Daan..........

[<SMILE>]

Hasta si Noynoy kay naguol ni Apollo24. . . .

Dili uy daghan kaayo ta problema nga resolbahon
unya wala pa gyud ta nagka-unite.

[lord-lord-lord]

naglalis na sd dri dah. lol

[kit_cebu]

nga-nga!!!

[monroy]

Nganong nag-apil2x man sad ka in the first place....

Ha? Nganu dili pwede mo apil. Public forum man ni. Kung gusto ka mag 1 on 1 ni romeojin nganu di man nimo i-message sa iyaha?

Prehas na ang ka GMA ug kang Gwen Garcia mga non- bailable offense.... After sa Sandiganbayan naa nasad laen...

Huh? Gwen Garcia was charged with malversation of public funds which is a bailable offense. Arroyo was charged with plunder. Di intawon na parehas bai...

What do you mean by strong evidence anyway? It seems you think that if a court doesn't dismiss a case outright it already means the evidence is strong. No. It only means there is prima facie evidence sufficient to warrant a trial, instead of outright dismissal. It is only during the trial when the court really weighs the strength of the evidence. How can you say evidence is strong if it hasn't been subject to cross-examination by the defense. You mean to say, if you are charged with a crime, any evidence presented by the prosecution should already be taken at face value? I really don't know where you're going with your posts, it seems you don't know what you're doing...

[Apollo24]

^ Huh? apil diha sa discussion Bro as long as dili karga2x o butang2x ang imo...

OT: Huh? Gwen Garcia was charged with malversation of public funds which is a bailable offense. Arroyo was charged with plunder. Di intawon na parehas bai...

OnT: Mas Bogo pa man d.i ka nako bai.... Ang kaso ni Gwen ug GMA prehas na... Pulos na Plunder... Non-Bailable Offense.. Para kahibaw ka unsa na ang plunder...

What is plunder and how is it committed? According to Section 2 of RA 7080, plunder is committed when a public officer who, by himself or in connivance with members of his family, relatives by affinity or consanguinity, business associates, subordinates or other persons, amasses, accumulates or acquires ill-gotten wealth through a combination or series of overt or criminal acts as described in Section 1 (d) of RA 7080 in the aggregate amount or total value of at least Fifty million pesos (P50,000,000.00). In addition, any person who participated with the said public officer in the commission of plunder shall likewise be punished.

The criminal acts described as follows:

1. Through misappropriation, conversion, misuse, or malversation of public funds or raids on the public treasury;

2. By receiving, directly or indirectly, any commission, gift, share, percentage, kickbacks or any/or entity in connection with any government contract or project or by reason of the office or position of the public officer concerned;

3. By the illegal or fraudulent conveyance or disposition of assets belonging to the National government or any of its subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities or government-owned or controlled corporations and their subsidiaries;

4. By obtaining, receiving or accepting directly or indirectly any shares of stock, equity or any other form of interest or participation including the promise of future employment in any business enterprise or undertaking;

[adminroot]

mora ug naa may down syndrome

anyways...