Legalize Abortion?

[burn_my_eyes]

---

^^ wow.

stated as a true professional.

moral dilema: which stand do you abide doc?

[Nezumix22]

^^ wow.

stated as a true professional.

moral dilema: which stand do you abide doc?

Unfortunately, that depends on the situation at hand. For me, if there's a way to avoid abortion, then I'd choose that. But as we all know, nothing in life is perfect. So we expect the worst in these kinds of situation. If this were a hospital setting, an adhoc ethics committee would assess the case and give out their suggestions but still the patient has the last word, or the patient's husband or next of kin for that matter. If the committee deems it unethical, then the patient is advised to go to another hospital or look for a doctor who would do the operation if no other means is met. Meaning, the patient is given all the options and if a feasible option to avoid abortion is met, the patient is strongly suggested to take that course of action otherwise she'll be referred.

[burn_my_eyes]

yah, good doctors do that.

abortion as a last resort...when everything else(options) are no longer possible.

[mannyamador]

basta bottomline is, the medical profession should not promote abortion as a choice.

Opps... I misread your post. So I'll delete my wrong comment here. Sorry about that.

The Constitution makes it clear that abortion is NOT an available option in this country. It is illegal and should remain so. Those who allow it are doing so against the basic law of the land.

Something more to think about:

When you spread out your hands in prayer, I will hide my eyes from you;
even if you offer many prayers, I will not listen. Your hands are full of blood;
wash and make yourselves clean. Take your evil deeds out of my sight! Stop
doing wrong, learn to do right! Seek justice, encourage the oppressed. Defend
the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow. "Come now, let us
reason together," says the LORD. "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall
be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.
-- Isaiah 1:15 - 18

[kopras]

A basta ABORTION is very against LIVING RELIGIOUS WAY!!!!!!!!!
SOON-RUIZ<<<<<<<<<<is very BAD for ME..........


LUIGI is the MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[mannyamador]

Murder of the innocent nicely illustrated below:

DILATION AND EVACUATION ABORTION OF 23 WEEK OLD FETUS

Dilation and Evacuation is a 2nd trimester abortion procedure. For the procedure to take place, the woman's cervix must first be dilated, usually with laminaria, over a two or three day period prior to the abortion. Laminaria sticks are made of sterilized and compressed seaweed that can be inserted into a woman's cervix. Here, they begin expanding from moisture absorption, resulting in an enlarged cervix. When the women returns for the actual abortion to take place, forceps are inserted through the enlarged cervix into the uterus. The abortion provider then uses the forceps instrument to dismember the fetus by seizing a leg or arm and twisting it until it tears off and can be pulled out of the uterus. This will continue until only the head remains. Finally the skull is crushed and also pulled out. The body parts must then be reassembled to ensure that the entire baby has been removed.


[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-01.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-02.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-03.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-04.jpg[/img]

[mannyamador]

The Case Against Abortion: Unwantedness
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-D-1-unwantedness.html

One of the favorite mantras of abortion advocates around the country is "Every Child a Wanted Child". It sounds noble enough, until you realize what their solution to unwantedness is. If a child isn't wanted, they argue, then it shouldn't be born. The problem, of course, is that the child is already conceived, and the only way to keep said child from being born is to kill it. How do they justify such violence? Often by arguing that it is better for the child to be dead than for the child to be unwanted.

This is a bogus argument. It doesn't work for the simple fact that no one makes such an argument about children after birth. Whoever heard Planned Parenthood or the National Organization for Women (NOW) argue that it would be better to kill children waiting for adoption rather than let them suffer through an "unwanted" life? If someone's right to life truly were established or removed based simply on their "wantedness", that would be the deathnell of homeless men and women around the nation.

Something as subjective as "wantedness" can never be the basis for granting someone the right to life, and abortion advocates know this. They don't argue that mothers should be free to kill their "unwanted" children after birth because they know these children are living, human beings with full rights of personhood. The only reason they argue that mothers should be free to kill their unwanted children before birth is because they're ignoring the scientific reality that these children, too, are living, human beings. The question is humanity, not wantedness.

Finally, it must never be forgotten, that the very discussion of "wantedness" in the first place ignores a substantial reality. There are no "unwanted" children in the broadest sense. Even if the biological parents want nothing to do with their offspring, there are families all over the nation waiting desperately to adopt a baby, families who are willing to adopt diseased babies of any race or ethnicity. This oft-cited notion of "unwantedness" is misleading and is utterly insufficient to justify even a single abortion.

[thyshop]

with the ever increasing population growth and poverty level..makatabang kaha ang abortion??

[Rance]

Yes.

[Motownkid]

HELL NO!