Gusto mo ug kausaban, di ba? Manlihok ta! O basin kutob ra mo sa yawyaw ug pagreklamo?

[silent-kill]

---

abi kog onsa imong pasabot sa "mang lihok ta" harlem shake imo pasabot? haha kong mao na hala sugdi kai mo sunod ko. MUSIC!

[m_a_r_k_u_z]

unsa mani TS? abi nako og c uncle mar lopez ni.... ikaw nag nidagan pagka kandidato? maypag walay election para walay mamutar kung mao mn gani, kani nga istorya, dugay na kaayo ni, wala jud kausaban, napun-an pa noon, bisan kinsa pana molingkod diha, mama-ayo og bati nga politiko, kung naa mn gani maayo nga politiko, initan, kung bati initan, ang resulta gubot....basta panahon sa kampanya, bisan asang sook, sudlon, pero inig human sa eleksyon, kaming mga kabos, maglisod na og dool.....suporter ka og usa ka politiko TS? hinay2x lng mo dri ha, ayaw mog away, kay makadawat nya tag award ani.....


OT: asa mn ka TS nga partido, sa Team Patay or Team Buhay ot type O ba kaha....

[Marshall Lawyer]

Mao ni inyong style promoting federalism,
frankly speaking nagpakauwaw lang kang Rufuz Rodriguez,
maayo ra ba na nga congressman.
Maayo pa man tos Dubiouz nimo kay magtinarong man ug tubag,
Is this the way to campaign effectively,
I don't think so.

this is not a campaign FYI. this is an advocacy that is going to last even if elections have long ended. that u mistook this for a campaign only means that u need to perk up ur empathy and understanding. but i guess the jaded part of u is too strong that u would even dare mock the sincerity of people.

unfortunately, this is not a religious order, so u cannot expect everyone to be other-worldly and saintly. my apologies to sir rufuz but i don't think i shame him at all because of what i said. he'd reprimand me at most. but shamed? hmmm who are u to say that when you're not part of this advocacy and do not feel what we feel when we meet ppl like u? it's but natural to defend the integrity of your cause. other people's prejudices might taint it.

my apologies, smile, for stooping down to ur level. better see for urself what we are first than launch a series of unfounded mockeries. thanks!

[noy]

ang akong nabasa kay ang "NAAY PANIHAPON" ra jud. Lol

[emow]

i have read some parts of the party's political platform. There are commendable points, however, there are contradicting points that is troubling me. How can there be job creation through free market mechanism when you have state bureaucracies and agencies in placed? That is not free market mechanism. That is still State dictated mechanism.

Establishment of a strong Competition Commission to prevent monopolies. This commission will over see that business will play fairly and protect the people from unfair business practices. Who will over see over this commission so that it will never favor any business? Who will over see the over seer of this commission? Suggestion, eliminate government involvement in the free market otherwise this will be no different than what we have right now,

Increased budget for state research. Not too free marketey sounding.... A pool of public funds is a good place for corruption to prosper.

Responsible taxation policy. I disagree with everything detailed in this policy. A progressive income tax? That will push capitalists away and force people to be dishonest with their tax declaration. Honestly, i don't want the STATE to play a SUPPORTIVE ROLE in the economic lives of the people. The state should be at the back seat, favor no one, and act upon only any violation of rights. Taxation should be made only upon the exchange of goods and services and not on the income of the person. The person should have sovereign authority over his own income. We are not chess pieces.

I am not convinced that the party is well grounded with the principles of freedom and justice. Forgive me, but the members of this party maybe social technocrats who sincerely believed that they can do better than the current personalities in position but are going to commit the same mistakes like all social technocrats do.

If indeed the party is really adhering to personal freedom, it should respect the property rights of its citizens, and never strive to redistribute wealth in the name of assistance, equality, and for development of any sort. The free market will dictate the course of the society, not elected representatives.

[Marshall Lawyer]

i have read some parts of the party's political platform. There are commendable points, however, there are contradicting points that is troubling me. How can there be job creation through free market mechanism when you have state bureaucracies and agencies in placed? That is not free market mechanism. That is still State dictated mechanism.

Establishment of a strong Competition Commission to prevent monopolies. This commission will over see that business will play fairly and protect the people from unfair business practices. Who will over see over this commission so that it will never favor any business? Who will over see the over seer of this commission? Suggestion, eliminate government involvement in the free market otherwise this will be no different than what we have right now,

Increased budget for state research. Not too free marketey sounding.... A pool of public funds is a good place for corruption to prosper.

Responsible taxation policy. I disagree with everything detailed in this policy. A progressive income tax? That will push capitalists away and force people to be dishonest with their tax declaration. Honestly, i don't want the STATE to play a SUPPORTIVE ROLE in the economic lives of the people. The state should be at the back seat, favor no one, and act upon only any violation of rights. Taxation should be made only upon the exchange of goods and services and not on the income of the person. The person should have sovereign authority over his own income. We are not chess pieces.

I am not convinced that the party is well grounded with the principles of freedom and justice. Forgive me, but the members of this party maybe social technocrats who sincerely believed that they can do better than the current personalities in position but are going to commit the same mistakes like all social technocrats do.

If indeed the party is really adhering to personal freedom, it should respect the property rights of its citizens, and never strive to redistribute wealth in the name of assistance, equality, and for development of any sort. The free market will dictate the course of the society, not elected representatives.

hi emow! that's great input from you! as of now, we're trying to work on all the loopholes. we do admit that our platforms are far from perfect, and that we too have our fair share of struggles. however, everything's a work in progress and we're doing it one step at a time, district by district (since we are a district-centered political party and we practice the 60(district)-40(national) federalism principle). that's why we need more sincere people who can think like u do and assist us in actively campaigning for the principles we espouse - and not the candidates' personalities.

to answer your query, however, social market economy is neither dirigiste (total government intervention) nor overly free market. social market economy is the balance between the two. there's a bit of state regulation and a bit of the invisible hand. the government is still necessary because too much freedom in the economy will result to recession (remember the 2008 financial meltdown?). what happened more than four years ago is that banks had too much freedom in the US. they abused this freedom by accepting loans here and there without bothering to check whether the loaners were qualified or not. they consolidated all these loans and sold them to investors who bought the loans and invested them. banks were so happy that they made too much money so they approved more loans and sold them. what happened then was that there were more borrowed money than actual income or money deposited. had there been enough government intervention (i.e. strict policies that regulate the amount of money coming in and out of banks; policies that regulate bank-investor relationships), then the 2008 recession would not have haunted everyone else in the globe. please see the documentary Inside Job for more detailed explanation of this matter.

also, to quote Alexander Pope, the virtue of "capitalism is the unequal move of blessings." given the fact that RP is still a developing country, to suddenly inject a purely capitalist economic system will create a great disparity between the already rich and the poorest of the poor. we cannot risk this as yet. capitalism needs capital and you cannot do that when majority of your population lives below the poverty line. social market economy is the best alternative.

the best working example of social market economy is Germany's own politico-economic system, which was instrumental to their quick rise to power following the chaos of World War II and later when East Germany was finally integrated with the West. To put it more succinctly:

In order for this system to function effectively, it is crucial to guarantee competition within a framework of open markets and to prevent the exercise of market power. In this way, market mechanisms expand consumption opportunities, motivate suppliers to make innovations and technological advances, and distribute income and profits in accordance with individual achievement. One of the key responsibilities of government is to establish the policy framework for effective competition. At the same time, the state must foster the willingness and ability of individuals to take personal initiative and to act independently (© Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology).

social market economy is like yin-yang working together to create a balance between government and the market. this feature is already existing in the Philippines, and one of our visions as a party and organization is to maximize the social market economy features within existing systems - of course with human dignity at the core of it all. as far as job generation is concerned, both private and public entities can work hand in hand in creating more jobs. look at PESO or POEA. these are just a few hints of social market economy at work in the Philippines. they say, though, that there are actually a lot of jobs in place already. the problem is that these existing job vacancies do not match the respective qualifications of available workforce. hopefully, we can sort this out too in the future.

thanks for your input and it would be our pleasure to have you participate this saturday and hear your thoughts out! pax filipinas!

[<SMILE>]

this is not a campaign FYI. this is an advocacy that is going to last even if elections have long ended. that u mistook this for a campaign only means that u need to perk up ur empathy and understanding. but i guess the jaded part of u is too strong that u would even dare mock the sincerity of people.

unfortunately, this is not a religious order, so u cannot expect everyone to be other-worldly and saintly. my apologies to sir rufuz but i don't think i shame him at all because of what i said. he'd reprimand me at most. but shamed? hmmm who are u to say that when you're not part of this advocacy and do not feel what we feel when we meet ppl like u? it's but natural to defend the integrity of your cause. other people's prejudices might taint it.

my apologies, smile, for stooping down to ur level. better see for urself what we are first than launch a series of unfounded mockeries. thanks!

A bile person like you should not get into this kind of business,
In your representation,instead of promoting your cause you made it look terribly bad,
could you read back and look at your post responses,similar response to a rabid an angry dog.
hmmmm. not a campaign eh, then what are you doing here,
what's your purpose in making this thread, trolling around.

Remember we are a part of the voting populace,
and we do have the say, why cater sympathy from us for changes
if we are not welcome at all, this is idiocity plain and simple.

How high are you now stooping at my level,
Do you know me?
such an arogant remark of a person who does not know
that he already destroyed the integrity of his cause.
Stupidity at it's worst form. Oops sorry my bad.
very

[<SMILE>]

Kumusta mga higala!

Kitang tanan adunay tagsa-tagsa ka haligutgot ngadto sa gobyerno!

Kitang tanan gusto nang mausab ang dagan sa pulitika!

Kitang tanan di na ganahan ug balik-balik na mga saad!

Kalagot makakita ug mga pulitika na sige ra ug pamintaha sa katilingban!

Ang problema... ngano man gihapon ato ni silang botaran taga eleksyon

Ang pangutana pud... sa sige nimo ug pagyawyaw ug pagreklamo diha, naa ba kaha ka'y gibuhat para mausab ang imong kahimtang ug ang kahimtang sa katilingban - sa ato ba kahang nasod?

KUNG WALA MAN KA'Y GIBUHAT, NGANONG GAYAWYAW UG GAREKLAMO MAN SAD KA DIHA

Mao ni karon...

Ug mao pud nang gi-awhag ko kamong tanan na motambong sa usa ka pulong-pulong kung diin DILI LANG TA MAGSIGE UG YAWYAW UG REKLAMO!

MAGSTORYAHANAY TA UG TARONG! MAGMUGNA TA UG TARONG UG KONGKRETONG MGA SOLUSYON!

TAMBONG KARONG SABADO, MARSO 23, 2013, SA CROWN REGENCY HOTEL BOARD ROOM NA NAA MAHIMUTANG SA OSMEÑA BOULEVARD, CEBU CITY.

TABANGI MI UG HIMO UG TARONG NA SOLUSYON! ATO IBALIK INYONG IDEALISMO NA HAPIT NA MAPAWNG - O NAPAWNG NA BA KAHA?

TAMBONG UG KITANG TANAN, DUNGAN, TARONG UG MAGKAHI-USANG SUKLAN ANG BATI NA PANGHITABO SA ATONG DAKBAYAN UG SA ATONG NASOD!

Wala ka mag-inusara. Daghan tang nabalaka! Tambong!

SABADO, MARSO 23, 2013, SA CROWN REGENCY HOTEL BOARD ROOM, OSMEÑA BLVD. NAAY PANIHAPON!

Text lang sa 09065550328 ug pangitaa si Rejene Lakibul para sa dugang kasayuran.

Wala gyud diay ka mangampanya,
sorry pero amalayar kaayo ka pareho sa imong username.

[cliff_drew]

@TS, why not talk and discuss all these change blah blah and solutions to society's problems here in this forum? This is a biggest community you can get or gather for free.

[Marshall Lawyer]

A bile person like you should not get into this kind of business,
In your representation,instead of promoting your cause you made it look terribly bad,
could you read back and look at your post responses,similar response to a rabid an angry dog.
hmmmm. not a campaign eh, then what are you doing here,
what's your purpose in making this thread, trolling around.

Remember we are a part of the voting populace,
and we do have the say, why cater sympathy from us for changes
if we are not welcome at all, this is idiocity plain and simple.

How high are you now stooping at my level,
Do you know me?
such an arogant remark of a person who does not know
that he already destroyed the integrity of his cause.
Stupidity at it's worst form. Oops sorry my bad.
very

my bad. i should have put "WARNING: THIS POST IS NOT FOR THE JADED AND THE PREJUDICED. THIS IS FOR THE OPEN-MINDED, THE NON-CONDEMNING, AND ANYONE WITH THE HEART TO SERVE. REFRAIN FROM MAKING UNSOLICITED COMMENTS IF YOU DO NOT BELONG TO THE LATTER." if that warning alone can put off haters and everyone who has nothing good to say, i'd do that with every post i may have in the future (here or wherever).

we're not trying to get the sympathy of the voting populace as you well put it. we're trying to build more than just votes and political seats. destroyed you say? you couldn't have been more incorrect. thanks for noticing!

whatever your "cause" is, i hope it serves you well too!