Mga Pari paminyoon na

[superidol]

this is just the personal opinion of the author and not the official stand of the Catholic Church.

i second this motion . .

[judge3ni]

Cesare Borgia, son of Pope Alexander VI (with a mistress)

checked this sa wikipedia, you might want to read.. mau pud siguro naa ta background

In the Catholic Church, the apostles are considered to have been the first priests and bishops in the Church. Some say the call to be eunuchs for the sake of heaven in Matthew 19 was a call to be sexually continent and that this developed into mandatory celibacy for priests as the successors of the apostles. Others see the call to be sexually continent in Matthew 19 to be a caution for men who were too readily divorcing and remarrying. The view of the Church is that celibacy is a reflection of life in Heaven, a source of detachment from the material world which aids in one's relationship with God. Celibacy is designed to "consecrate themselves with undivided heart to the Lord and to "the affairs of the Lord, they give themselves entirely to God and to men. It is a sign of this new life to the service of which the Church's minister is consecrated; accepted with a joyous heart celibacy radiantly proclaims the Reign of God."[21] In contrast to this, St Peter, the first apostle called by Jesus (Matthew 4) and considered today the first pope, was married (Matthew .

Celibacy was first written into law for all priests in the 12th century at the First Lateran Council (1123), but it was a common practice much earlier, as shown in the Spanish Council of Elvira (~295-302), which required celibacy of clerics.[22] Because clerics resisted it, the celibacy mandate was restated at the Second Lateran Council (1139) and the Council of Trent (1545–64).[22] In places coercion and enslavement of clerical wives and children was apparently involved in the enforcement of the law.[23] “The earliest decree in which the children [of clerics] were declared to be slaves and never to be enfranchised [freed] seems to have been a canon of the Synod of Pavia in 1018. Similar penalties were promulgated against wives and concubines (see the Synod of Melfi, 1189 can. Xii), who by the very fact of their unlawful connexion with a subdeacon or clerk of higher rank became liable to be seized by the over-lord”.[23]

The early church resisted false asceticism. Scripture reflects the fact that early Christians embraced marriage and yet felt that a false ascetic bias against marriage was seeping into their culture: 1 Timothy 4:1 "In the last times, some will turn away from the faith by paying attention to deceitful spirits and demonic instructions through the hypocrisy of liars with branded consciences. They forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving for those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good and nothing is to be rejected when received with thanksgiving. For it is made holy by the invocation of God in prayer".[24] Mandatory celibacy for priests continues to be a contested issue even today.

Usually, only celibate men are ordained as priests in the Latin Rite.[25][26] More recently, married clergy who have converted from other denominations have been ordained Roman Catholic priests without becoming celibate.[27] Mandatory priestly celibacy is not a doctrine, or dogma, of the Church (examples of Catholic doctrine would be the principle of the absolute respect for life or the belief in the Assumption and Immaculate Conception) but a church rule or discipline, like the use of the vernacular (local) language in Mass or the ancient rule of Lenten fasting and abstinence.[28] As such, it can theoretically change at any time though it still must be obeyed by Catholics until the change were to take place. The Eastern Catholic Churches ordain both celibate and married men. However, in both the East and the West, bishops are chosen from among those who are celibate.[29][30] In Ireland, several priests have maintained "secret" families, the two most prominent being Bishop Eamonn Casey and Father Michael Cleary (priest).

One explanation for the origin of obligatory celibacy is that it is based on Christ's example and on the writings of Paul, who wrote of the advantages celibacy allowed a man in serving the Lord,[31] Celibacy was popularized by the early Christian theologian Origen and Augustine. Another possible explanation for the origins of obligatory celibacy revolves around more practical reason, "the need to avoid claims on church property by priests' offspring".[32] It remains a matter of Canon Law (and often a criterion for certain religious orders, especially Franciscans) that priests do not own land and therefore cannot pass it on to legitimate or illegitimate children. The land belongs to the Church through the local diocese as administered by the Local Ordinary, or Bishop.

Celibacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[jover]

mao na dha haha

[morethanjusttalk]

,naa mn jd mga pari nga naay kalive.in,tagu2 lng jd,

[Bentleys]

Daghan man ang mga rumors
pero rumors ra,
Dili gyud na puwede mag-minyo ang mga Pari
kay gidili man, puwede na sila mag-minyo kung
mogawas na sa pagka-Pari.
Kung makasala aw excommunicated dayon.

[Dhesz]

Actually sa tinuod lang naa man pari nga naa na mga anak so naa ra nila f magminto sila but mostop na lang xa sa pagkapari...

[SioDenz]

Daghan kaayu musupak mga tawo diri sa Article kay DILI lagi Dapat magminyo ang mga Pari. Kusgan pa kaayu mangugat kay DILI lagi pwedi.

Pero if ang Santo Papa nah mu Desisyon nga pwedi na mag Minyu, Klaru kaayu kining mga tawhana Abtik pas Manatad MUBALI sa ilang Stand. Mu ana dayun, Aws sakto baya ang Simbahan, Dapat jud mag minyo ang mga Pari oi

[Apollo24]

Dli sa na mahitabo bro nakita nana sa Sto. Papa ang epekto... Mabahin lang ang attention ug time sa pari... Dugay naman ni na isyu na naay pari gusto magminyo... Pero unsaon nalang noh kung anak sa mga pari tag 5 ka buok.. Gubot kaayo ang simbahan... Mao nang dli jud pwede..

[Bentleys]

Naa puy daghan dire mangugat gyud nga paminyoon ang Pari,
nganong mamugos man.
Usa man gyud ilang purpose nganong paminyoon man ang Pari,
nga ang pari gani mismo pagsulod pa lang niya kahibalo na man siya
nga dili na gyud siya puwedeng mag-minyo.
Free man tingale siya before that, sa pagpili unsa ang iyang gusto.
The will of the entire group is always the will of the leader,
para united.

[cyberchrono]

Kinahanglan ba gyud nga dili ka minyo pra isangyaw ang mga gi tudlo sa Ginoo??

Unsa man ang kalahian sa mga pari nga minyo ug dili minyo interms sa pag alagad sa Ginoo??