Manganak ta ug Daghan --- Archbishop Palma :)

[noy.juan]

---

“Bisan pa ug giaprobahan ang RH Bill, kadtung gusting manganak dili lamang usa, dili lamang duha pero tulo o upat, musalig lang kita kay Lord (Even with the passage of the RH Law, those who want to have children, not just one, not two but three or four, should put their trust in the Lord),” he added.


ka klaro ana kadtung gusto?

gi-lain na sad ug sabot sa mga anti-Catholics....

na hala tirahi ang simbahan...

[seven_segment]

i think wla niya gi belittle ang mga tawo nga ni simba kay naa cyay gi ingon nga "labi pa" so not all but katong uban.
Pero bisan unsa pa man ang iyahang pasabot ana, i think dili na ta angay magpa hypocrito ug magpa george2 nga moingon ta nga nakasabot jud ang tanan sa gipasabot sa misa ug naminaw gyud sila sa wali gikan sa start to finish.

Sayop gihapon ang obispo para nako. kay ang iya gi mention kato gusto manganak, so anyone nga gusto manganak whether naay trabaho or wala. ubanay pa iya pod unta gi mention nga maghinay hinay unta ang uban kay isang kahig isang tuka ra baya intawon nang uban unya abi pa lang kay nag ingon si bishop nga kinsay gusto, okay na daghan anak.

bai simple ra kaayo...you missed the point...

the bishop wants to emphasized those people who wants more children....

nothing more and nothing less...

kung ganahan ka pun-an ug pasumbingay katong ganahan manganak ug daghan pero walay trabaho ayaw na lang mo panganak...aw puede raw sad ikaw ang nagmisa, the bishop can say it, he may not do so...kay lain man iyang emphasis

In reference to the RH Law, Palma said that even if President Benigno Aquino III passed the law, couples should not be afraid if they want more children.


like wenlove24 said: And to rely on God's providence is not meant to inculcate laziness but trust amidst struggle and chaos.

[seven_segment]

Diha ang sayop sa imong bolded phrase bay ... kay ingon siya nga kadtung gusto manganak ug daghan is OK nga walay regard sa financial situations pag raise ug anak . Instead unta siya mo ingon nga "kung naa'y ika gasto ang pamilya nga maka buhi ug daghang anak" , mas neutral pa unta ang stance niya bahin sa religious teachings ug sa RH Bill .

Sa mga nanimba ug nakadungog sa iyahang wali maka ingon jud nga OK RA DAGHANG ANAK BAHALA WALAY KWARTA IKABUHI KAY INGON SI PALMA TRUST LANG TA NI LORD . Butangi ...

Sakto man iyang gisulti nga "many couples have more than one child and live happy lives together" pero misleading kaayo . Yes the more the merrier jud KUNG naa lang jud kay ikabuhi . I don't think it's the same case sa mga couples living in poverty nga daghan ug anak . Mao na ang mga edukado mo bira jud sa simbahan kay kahibaw man mi sa kamatooran .

IPADAYON ANG AWARENESS SA KATAWHAN BAHIN SA FAMILY PLANNING UG SAFE S3X ... AYAW PATOO ANANG TAGA SIMBAHAN !!!

bai simple ra kaayo...you missed the point...

the bishop wants to emphasized those people who wants more children....

nothing more and nothing less...

kung ganahan ka pun-an ug pasumbingay katong ganahan manganak ug daghan pero walay trabaho ayaw na lang mo panganak...aw puede raw sad ikaw ang nagmisa, the bishop can say it, he may not do so...kay lain man iyang emphasis

In reference to the RH Law, Palma said that even if President Benigno Aquino III passed the law, couples should not be afraid if they want more children.


like wenlove24 said: And to rely on God's providence is not meant to inculcate laziness but trust amidst struggle and chaos.

[kit_cebu]

"sa kadtung gustong manganak ug daghan" ra man na bai

ikaw dili man kaha nimo gusto?

good luck sa resulta anang "IF" ninyo...pakapinan pag "musalig lang kita kay Lord"

si Lord ba gu'y mo-palit gatas ani nila.....di man gani ang simbahan....si Lord pa ba....


.

[raissah]

bai simple ra kaayo...you missed the point...

the bishop wants to emphasized those people who wants more children....

nothing more and nothing less...

kung ganahan ka pun-an ug pasumbingay katong ganahan manganak ug daghan pero walay trabaho ayaw na lang mo panganak...aw puede raw sad ikaw ang nagmisa, the bishop can say it, he may not do so...kay lain man iyang emphasis

In reference to the RH Law, Palma said that even if President Benigno Aquino III passed the law, couples should not be afraid if they want more children.


like wenlove24 said: And to rely on God's providence is not meant to inculcate laziness but trust amidst struggle and chaos.

first of all, babaye ko so ayaw ko tawga ug bai.
2ndly, I think I can do a better job mo misa kaysa sa iyaha kung mao to klase sa iyang winalihan nga dili man diay cya katarung ug storya sa iyang mga gimisahan.

ganiha ra ka nag use sa term nga emphasize.. mao nga wala nimo ma gets ang points sa mga tawo dre because that is the root of the problem nga iyang emphasis is only to those nga ganahan manganak ug daghan and wla niya butangi ug emphasis ang kinsay may kaya nga mobuhi ug daghan

kung wla gihapon ka ka-gets sa point? matuog nlang ko. hehehe

[redemption32]

With the recent passing of the RH Bill, do you really think Palma was just saying "sa kadtong gustong manganak ug dili lang usa, blah! blah! blah!"

No. He was attacking the concept of the RH Bill which aims to educate the less informed.

If what you are claiming is true and he only really meant "sa kadtong gusto" lang, isn't that just saying the obvious

Aw. Ok... Sorry nah....

To Palma: Thank you, Captain Obvious!!!!

[seven_segment]

good luck sa resulta anang "IF" ninyo...pakapinan pag "musalig lang kita kay Lord"

si Lord ba gu'y mo-palit gatas ani nila.....di man gani ang simbahan....si Lord pa ba....


.

good luck pud bai

[seven_segment]

first of all, babaye ko so ayaw ko tawga ug bai.
2ndly, I think I can do a better job mo misa kaysa sa iyaha kung mao to klase sa iyang winalihan nga dili man diay cya katarung ug storya sa iyang mga gimisahan.

ganiha ra ka nag use sa term nga emphasize.. mao nga wala nimo ma gets ang points sa mga tawo dre because that is the root of the problem nga iyang emphasis is only to those nga ganahan manganak ug daghan and wla niya butangi ug emphasis ang kinsay may kaya nga mobuhi ug daghan

kung wla gihapon ka ka-gets sa point? matuog nlang ko. hehehe

ok, have a nice sleep bai, "babai"...

[seven_segment]

With the recent passing of the RH Bill, do you really think Palma was just saying "sa kadtong gustong manganak ug dili lang usa, blah! blah! blah!"

No. He was attacking the concept of the RH Bill which aims to educate the less informed.

If what you are claiming is true and he only really meant "sa kadtong gusto" lang, isn't that just saying the obvious

Aw. Ok... Sorry nah....

To Palma: Thank you, Captain Obvious!!!!

how do you measure a person's knowledge?

kinsa mani silang less informed ba? kinsa mani silang wala kaila ug condom ug contraceptions?

[wenlove24]

The good bishop means well. Simple. Those who are able, why not? Provided they have the means to do so. Of ccourse the contrary means, why should you when you aren't able? We can't expect the president to do 24-hour question and answer forums for us. So does the good bishop. He delegates. The invitations are free. People just don't attend them and learn more how to live their faith. Don't blame the bishop. The power of influence does not come from him. If it did, we'd all be turned into
stone. But I can see a lot of us have grown cold and indifferent. Pointing to his flaws and your flaws. Then everyone asks for your opinion. And mine as well as the others, not to develop a new philosophy or way of thinking but to compare it in contrast with theirs thereby creating conflict and discOrd.
The media only sensationalized those few words of his for their own reasons. To what end is as clear as the living daylights. Some see it while others pretend they don't. If I am biased for pointing out what's right then so be it.