nga election period man judOriginally Posted by estor_boot
mao ba na valid argument?? nganong gi-timing man intawn ni og election period?? mas nag duda jud ko ani..
still, we are in the losing end kung i-pugos ni garganera ang issue...
nga election period man judOriginally Posted by estor_boot
mao ba na valid argument?? nganong gi-timing man intawn ni og election period?? mas nag duda jud ko ani..
still, we are in the losing end kung i-pugos ni garganera ang issue...

when i said "valid argument" i mean there is a legal basis. i am sorry im not capable of expounding more what that legal basis is.
well, the land title was awarded only last year and the we heard the lease agreements between the Cebu City government and the leasees lately. so, that might explain the timing for the filing of the case.
I see at as a politically motivated move in part of KUSUG..they want a popular contender in the city council race..luoy kaayu cla kung BOPK all the way ang city government =)
^^
bitaw sa.... politically motivated jud ni.... dili lang anti-development ni sila grandstanding pajud... nganong karon paman ni sila nigimaw og nagsamok-samok.... kay election naman!!!...
Murag wala na jud silay laing nakit-an nga issue against Tom ang SRP nalang...
bad move for the opposition....kay uwahi na nag tanan...

but hey! kng tinuod to ang gi ingon ni tomas na PEZA accredited ang SRP then wala case is Garganera
Osmeña, however, said that the SRP is operating under Philippine Economic Zone Authority (Peza) rules and regulations, which exempt special economic zones from holding a bidding when leasing lots.
agree sad ko aning gi ingon ni Davide
“Personally I think this is an anti-development move on their part, like they’re trying to block the progress of the project,”
hehehe GRANDSLAM/GRANDSLAP Garganera![]()
i agree it's politically motivated kai du-ol na ang eleksyon. no one is immune. everyone plays the game. even tomas himself plays the game. (e.g. overpriced lamposts issue against ouano & radaza)
Kung si Garganera naay "valid argument", why man karon pa man niya gipa-gawas. Ni-reklamo unta siya during sa development sa SRP.Originally Posted by estor_boot
this is baseless. tommy and joel marie are not stupid. they should have their bases covered.
who is joel garganera anyway? he is nobody! if this accusation will hold water some, it was somebody bigger who has been barking by now, probably sonny or gwen. mr. garganera is just a sacrificial pawn, and he took it. what a nitwit!
gipamaligya man gani sa cebu province ang Lahug Airport nga naa na'y mga title before gi-expropriate sa mga tag-iya. kana naa gyud na'y klarong basehan, pero pildi gihapon sa supreme court ang kadaghanan. mga inilang datu pa gani kaayong mga pamilya sa cebu ang mga tag-iya ato, pero wa gihapon mag silbi, pildi gihapon.[br]Posted on: March 27, 2007, 07:45:22 PM_________________________________________________n o more interaction on this thread? hmmmn....
Nahilum na ni kay nakita nga bisan granstanding (without a doubt) ang tinuod nga tumong ni Garganera naa may igong basihanan mao nga wa nagpataka ug bukal si Tomas. Kay ug mugna-mugna lang ni morag iro-baboy-buang si Tomas nga mangasaba ni Garganera.
Ug wa ni gi-kwestiyon ni Garganera karon sooner or later naay makadiskubre aning nga flaw sa mga transaction. Mahimong illegal ang pagbaligya sa mga lots sa SRP. Ma-technical si Tomas ug ang stong siyudad ra gihapon ang madaot.
Let's hope nga mahilot ra dayon nila sa mga available legal ug procedural remedies. Na-abtikan lang sila ni Tomas aning scheme sa oposisyon.
Similar Threads |
|