Questions for the Atheists

[Xian120]

---

haha...mao most likely ing ana jud na...so mao di jud ko moconsider nga ang science mu contradict sa Ginoo...
'cause after all...we haventdiscovered everything yet and most of all our finite minds could never fathom or assume
attributes of the Infinite..

regarding Jesus being wise bai, does it follow that tou perceived Him to be a moral person or a teacher as well apart from being wise?..

but of course my statement was a sarcasm bro..

di man jud na mo contradict 'coz nothing is above God (if i am to borrow your words), creator of everything gud so everything science can discover will always be attributed to him.. way dag-anan ang siyensya haha,. proving the existence of a multiverse is hard enough how much more kong naa pajud entity nga nag create ana, hahahaha, i cant even begin to imagine why such a creator would still take my doubts as a big deal., why create such a confusing world in the first place? hahaha..

[Xian120]

regarding Jesus being wise bai, does it follow that tou perceived Him to be a moral person or a teacher as well apart from being wise?..

like every human being (at least that's how i see Jesus) nobody is perfect, that goes without saying that his ideals also was not perfect, well let's just say dili tanan nga iyang gipangtudlo applicable sa pagka karon..

but i still emulate some of his Principles and teachings, gi idolize gihapon ug gi look up gihapon nko siya like classical philosophers such as Plato, Socrates and Confucius among others.. select and pick man ko when it comes to philosophies kay di man tanan gud applicable karon..

[Bears Grill]

Kadtong sigeg magpost dire, pala-away...hehe

[noy]

Lol , sarcasm diay to? hahaha...i honestly thought that was genuine..hahaha...
genuine sarcasm diay...

well if God was not someone personal, then it is just right that he wouldn't care...
but if He is like what the bible and other theistic holy books says, then the idea of Him
just fits the never ending longing in us...longings that we usually seek in family,acceptance,fortune,fame.power,knowledge.etc ...
it's like we are longing for something infinite in this finite world...
i know it doesn't make sense...unless hereafter or forever exists

[Xian120]

Kadtong sigeg magpost dire, pala-away...hehe

hahaha nganhi nsad ta kay naunlod na ang usa ka thread..

[noy]

Kadtong sigeg magpost dire, pala-away...hehe

Lol..musta bai?

[Xian120]

Lol , sarcasm diay to? hahaha...i honestly thought that was genuine..hahaha...

well of God was not someone personal, then it is just right that he wouldn't care...
but if He is like what the bible and other theistic holy books says, then the idea of Him
just fits the never ending longing in us...longings that we usually seek in family,acceptance,fortune,fame.power,knowledge.etc ...
it's like we are longing for something infinite in this finite world...
i know it doesn't make sense...unless hereafter or forever exists

ahahaha mura man ka'g wa kaila nko @noy.. it was just to say that whatever may be said about the nature of everything, so long as there are those who believe it will always be attributed to God, and there is nothing atheists can do about it..

[Bears Grill]

^^ @noy, back in my University days in Manila, one of our required philosophy subjects was called Philosophy of Man. There, we were taught Gabriel Marcel's Christian existentialist philosophy. Back then, I was convinced that our longing for something more--or what Marcel calls "metaphysical unease"--points to the existence of its fulfillment, just as hunger points to the existence of food. However, Freud calls this "wishful thinking" and this cannot be a rational basis for proving the existence of anything.

[Xian120]

to tag along, naa koy nabasahan sauna but nakalimot ko kong kinsa to nga book, i kind of rephrased it kay nakalimot ko, but the thought is this.. man's inexhaustible need for more is duly because of his want to feel good about himself.. 'coz that feeling of goodness is man's ultimate unconscious strive..

[noy]

ahahaha mura man ka'g wa kaila nko @noy.. it was just to say that whatever may be said about the nature of everything, so long as there are those who believe it will always be attributed to God, and there is nothing atheists can do about it..

hahahaha..mao2x..

but di pud sa ing ana bai oi...lain pud kaau murag mahulog way choice and aetheists..when actually
being an aetheist is already a choice..
i was merely speaking about my faith and understanding regarding science and God..that's all..besides, nature itself are both complex and in order..that alone is already a mystery..
that's why i said this God never cease to amaze me...
but for all we know, i could also be wrong..pero mao lagi, i'd rather lived believing He exists then die finding out He doesnt..
than otherwise...