What if kung tinood nga naay asawa, mga anak, ug mga apo si Jesus?

[jovipeorliohacokijo]

ang naka nindot sa katoliko naa silay gitawag ug "Doctors of the church" from the early centuries of christianity. wala pa si Martin Luther nag mogna ug Protesta.

ikaw ba jovs sige ka pangutana sa truth, unya imong thread pagdakong "WHAT IF"?

bisan pag usa ka dosena ang anak ni Jesus, it is still an speculation without facts tungod sa WHAT IF.

OT: mao ni sila sige ug pugong sa baho sa rome sauna ug vatican karon hehehe, tried to contain it, pero wa sila mahimo ky hinay hinay na pangalisngaw ang baho, unya mubuto ra nya na ang baho nga sila mismo bahu-an na within sa vatican hehehe. kung taas taas pa lng to ug life si Pope John Paul, di na gyud ta to siya mapugngan sa mga cardinals. siya baya ni bawi sa hell ug ni walk out tawon to siya katong gibasa ang katong kang Fatima ky gi "doctor" pud, ang gisulti publicly dili mao sa kang Fatima. Si Pope John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, pareha ra ni sila ug nahibaw-an.

[necrotic freak]

^^totally agree ko nimo @sio..

[psychologic]

nya ni exist jd kaha ni si JC? or buhat2x rani sa pinaka maung author na naghimo sa bible.. hehehe.. opinion raman kaha ni..

[necrotic freak]

OT: mao ni sila sige ug pugong sa baho sa rome sauna ug vatican karon hehehe, tried to contain it, pero wa sila mahimo ky hinay hinay na pangalisngaw ang baho, unya mubuto ra nya na ang baho nga sila mismo bahu-an na within sa vatican hehehe. kung taas taas pa lng to ug life si Pope John Paul, di na gyud ta to siya mapugngan sa mga cardinals. siya baya ni bawi sa hell ug ni walk out tawon to siya katong gibasa ang katong kang Fatima ky gi "doctor" pud, ang gisulti publicly dili mao sa kang Fatima. Si Pope John Paul II, Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, pareha ra ni sila ug nahibaw-an.

wala na tay angay istoryahan diri kay WHAT IF rani imong thread.

pwede kaayo ni ibalhin diri: Humor

[Benzh]

Agree....WHAT and IF are two words as non threatening as can be, but put them together side by side and they have the power to hunt you for the rest of your lives...what if? what if? what if?

[SioDenz]

nya ni exist jd kaha ni si JC? or buhat2x rani sa pinaka maung author na naghimo sa bible.. hehehe.. opinion raman kaha ni..

Ok raman na imu Opinion. imu man sad na so respito ra sad mi.

So if Dili tinuod si Kristo, so buhat buhat sa tawo ra ang sinuwat sa Bibliya. So if Binuhat ra sa tawo diay daghan sayop, daghan di tinuod, Magkabali bali ang teachings UG Labaw sa tanan MAKADAOT sa katawhan if sundon ang teachings sa Bibliya di bah?

Duna kaha kay maipakita diri nga Proof nga di tinuod si Kristo Or ang sinuwat sa Bibliya para makatoo sad ang uban diri bah.

[SioDenz]

Agree....WHAT and IF are two words as non threatening as can be, but put them together side by side and they have the power to hunt you for the rest of your lives...what if? what if? what if?

Nindot sad nang What If oi... Pero if musulti kag What If nya imung i Support nga Argument What If sad or Worst WALA kay ikapakita nga actual na Ebidensya - Di cguro mahitabo nang imung gi ingun nga "have the power to hunt you for the rest of your lives"...

[Breakeven]

Dako nag epekto because that will shake the foundation of Christianity. All Christian groups believe the bible to be the word of God dayon karon naa d.i asawa, anak, ug mga apo si Jesus makapangutana jud kun unsa katinood ang bibliya.. Duha ra jud ang kapaingnan kun tinood man. Either TS is referring to another Jesus, or the bible is a lie.

Obviously, he's referring to Jesus of the Da Vince code or gnostic gospels which were written in opposition of what the Christians believed....It's not the Jesus Christ of history!

What are the gnostic gospels?
Gnostic gospels are forgeries, fraudulently written in the names of the Apostles in order to give them a legitimacy in the early church. Thankfully, the early church fathers were nearly unanimous in recognizing the Gnostic gospels as promoting false teachings about virtually every key Christian doctrine. There are countless contradictions between the Gnostic gospels and the true Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. They should be rejected outright as not belonging in the Bible and not representing the genuine Christian faith.

[wire]

Kay if unsay Gisangyaw ni Kristo iya mang Gibuhat. Si Kristo dili lan Puro ra istorya, iya sad na gibuhat ang iyang gipang istorya Para kadtung mga nagduda niya IF MUBASA palan sa bibliya ug tarung - klaru kaayu dha nga ug unsay gisangyaw ni Kristo iya sad nang gibuhat ug gi praktis nagpaila sa iyang pagka Ginoo.

...OK, so, iya sad tong gipangyaw-yaw ug gipraktis ang makig-relasyon or magka-anak sa usa ka babae? (kung tinood man jud ni, tungod sa mga daghang claims?)

[wire]

...yes i agree bro, they are just trying to destroy what Christians belief. Usa sa mga factors is that daghan kaaU ug population ang christians. So, some of the religions are trying to pull out people from other Christian communities as well to join with them so that they could be (to be said) (they are) populated together with their own recruits. Then, some causes kay ang uban dili mobalhin kay ganahan sa (example) Catholics nga dili strict sa mga activities, practices, teachings, prayer requirements, etcs. labi ni ning mga the way we dress inside sa church diba? relax ra kaaU. Unlike sa uban putos jud as much as possible. Anyway, that's practices how they do - mao ang uban gahi jud. So, ngita sila ug paagi arun e-destroy ang Christians, so mao nani karon ilang gibuhat. Maau ni ikiha ug libel apil sa Cybercrime. LOL!

Obviously, he's referring to Jesus of the Da Vince code or gnostic gospels which were written in opposition of what the Christians believed....It's not the Jesus Christ of history!

What are the gnostic gospels?
Gnostic gospels are forgeries, fraudulently written in the names of the Apostles in order to give them a legitimacy in the early church. Thankfully, the early church fathers were nearly unanimous in recognizing the Gnostic gospels as promoting false teachings about virtually every key Christian doctrine. There are countless contradictions between the Gnostic gospels and the true Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. They should be rejected outright as not belonging in the Bible and not representing the genuine Christian faith.