MERGED: All about Anti-Cybercrime Law, related issues and developments

[nakaigo]

DILI nako makig chat ninyo diri kay ma priso ko!! ARTE mode ON!!...

[ain]

Though I do not agree on what these hackers did to our government websites, its a way of protest without the need of walking out the streets. Damage to property, yes, but not really disruption of its operation. These are not even e-commerce or banking sites. I bet nobody from the government knew what happened not unless the media exposed it.

I believed that PNP site was hacked? Correct me If im wrong.. Also, naa pabay mga Govt. Sites na gipang hack as of yesterday?

[geo25]

wla man q problem sa online fraud ug child porn. pero nganong ibawal man ang cybersex? it's against the constitutional right to privacy. so what kung naa'y maghubo2 sa cam dha. as long as 2 consenting adults ang ngbuhat sa act and done in the privacy of their own homes ug computer okies ra kaayo na.

ayaw q igna na ila ka ipa-preso kung ngcybersex mo sa imo asawa or girlfriend? or bsan gni random person lng gani basta ni-consent unya dli minor.

[jilllianicc]

Depriving of our very own "right" (slash) "freedom" of expression.... when in fact Philippines is a democratic country...
quite contradicting...

I agree. It's so unfair that people are being threatened to be prosecuted for something that was granted to them as a free people. What's next? Wire taps and cameras in homes? Big Brother would be so proud.

[wire]

...wla dapat ika-hadlok kung kabalo lang mo mohide sa n u ident.

[hulagway]

ayaw lang mo kumpyansa..kay kung kamao mo..kamao pud na sila....
pro against ko aning cyber law..

[PaYaSo]

wla man q problem sa online fraud ug child porn. pero nganong ibawal man ang cybersex? it's against the constitutional right to privacy. so what kung naa'y maghubo2 sa cam dha. as long as 2 consenting adults ang ngbuhat sa act and done in the privacy of their own homes ug computer okies ra kaayo na.

ayaw q igna na ila ka ipa-preso kung ngcybersex mo sa imo asawa or girlfriend? or bsan gni random person lng gani basta ni-consent unya dli minor.

as long there is no money involved i think its permissible.

once there is payment to the services done then that's where its punishable. nanginahanglan bya ug tax ang governo.

[ain]

On the positive side of this law, with due respect of it, not all the provisions of the Cybercrime law are oppressive and violating people’s basic computing rights. Many of the punishable offenses truly make sense as far as honest and peace-loving computer users and businesses are concerned. The major problems though are in the articles of Penalties, Enforcement & Implementation and Competent Authorities. It’s like these were formulated with their eyes closed. Their minds, it they ever worked, has been distracted by COC fever and excitement anyway. And these articles would promote abuse and violation of people’s basic rights to computing and property....But one provision I really like is the criminalization of Unsolicited Commercial Communication—those annoying pop-ups on your monitor and ad recordings on your cellphone network’s voicemail, which make me want to drop an asteroid on their office building. And one sweeping provision would be very invasive of peoples’ private lives: The Cybersex offense. What is the state’s business in my legitimate private and mutually consenting sexual act. If a couple are oceans apart, would the state penalize them for privately consummating their mutual sexual desire? (Curious)

Another heck part was when Tito Sotto inserted this LIBEL PART- Why? this particular LIBEL part intention is to threaten all Netizens who criticize Politicians and Government Officials... Diba sakto? They are much afraid na bombahan sila og e criticize sige sa online medias kay dli na sila kaagwanta sa UWAW most esp sa katong mga TIWA-EL na leader sa PINAS.

Bottom line, this Cybercrime law is peppered with flaws and is illegal and unconstitutional. As it is, this law would do more harm than good. Suspend, review, rewrite, change. Otherwise, scrap.

[ain]

Kani gyud oh:

Attention Law Makers, kindly refresh your mind about this 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.

Article III Bill of Rights :
Section 4. No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redness or grievances"

Pastilan, asa naman ni na law abeer? how was this? kumusta kaha ni na law? Ngano gud tawn kalit man lang na og insert si Lolo Sotto sa iyahang LIBEL PART? My Gawd! Naunsa nani... Party2x .. nayabag na.. Di na mada oi

[hulagway]

NBI says it has traced at least 20 ‘hacktivists’

Hmmm... kabalo sad sila mubasa og Wikipedia.

Hulaton tani kung kinsay madakpan. Sure ko naa ni silay dakpon nga hacker kuno dayon ipakita sa ABS-CBN picturan kadaghan, i-post sa newspaper.

Di man gani sila ka-trace sa mga snatcher sa dalan. Ultimo ga-snatch sa cellphone nako sauna atong ga scheme2 sila sauna ma-trace tungod sa SIM card/IMEI sa mobile.

Silk-Air 'bomb-threat' caller nailhan na - Banat » Banat Sections » Balita

sure ka?