I actually have second thoughts whether to respond or not. So,I'll try it one more time.

Originally Posted by
high_heels
I still do! Actually I've been laughing my butt out til now! Why? Irrational judgement is not born out of stupidity! But it is a manifestation of a flawed judgment to twist and manipulate your own belief.
Speaking about the Pink elephant, kay ngano...diba wala may pink elephant?!?! so by scientific evidence abnormal na! it does not even exist! get my point?
Wala=abnormal
How so? Wala is wala, abnormal is deviation from what is normal. I guess I am starting to see ngano naay mga tawo dili makasabot og tinarong nga reply.
By the way, I can color any elephant with pink. Does that make it abnormal? Interesting. Also, scientific evidence show that homosexuality is natural and normal.

Originally Posted by
high_heels
To quote you....
"You don't treat homos as second class citizens but you likened them with pink elephants [that is not normal for you.] What is the difference? If you don't understand this, then look at the post of trollolol. He likened gays with mentally incapacitated individuals and you are no different. It was just you decided to liken them with something else." <----- oh my! you are accusing me that I am treating you gays as second people? eeerrkk...sure ka? na igo ra siguro ka vayooooot! abnormal gyud bitaw nang mga kabubot-on nga ipugos nga kahibaw ta nga di normal.
Ikaw na ang nag-ingon nga dili mi normal. Therefore, you are thinking that you are above us kay kamo normal and kami dili. Unless you consider normal and abnormal to be similar.
Do you?

Originally Posted by
high_heels
Suma, if you eat your neighbor because for you its just like eating pork meat, does the majority consider it normal? di ba dili!!!
Wrong analogy. Unsa may connection/ similarity sa pagkaon sa imong silingan ug sa homosexuality? Time and again [if you only read the previous post instead of acting know-it-all] it has been proven to be normal and natural. It is not common, but it is normal.

Originally Posted by
high_heels
and to quote you again.... "Yes, validate his point that you are shrouded with flawed logic. Ka-klaro atong iyahang gi-mention: marriage equality
If you don't treat gays as equal, then they must have the same rights as you do. Don't you agree?" <----- YOU HAVE YOUR GAY RIGHTS duly given to you by law as a natural born male. unya magpa special treatment gyud mo like everyone else! Unsa may naka special sa third gender/unknown gender/or whatever you want to call it. We heterosexual people don't scream I need my RIGHTS to get married to my dog! wahhhh......
If you want to marry your dog, wala na koy labot ana. In the same way nga if ganahan ko makigminyo og same s3x wala na koy labot. Is it our fault nga wala ka ni-scream nga you need your rights to get married to the dog?

Originally Posted by
high_heels
Marriage equality is for male and female! that is equality there! bisag mag pa kasal kasal pa mo ron...the church will not recognize it...primarily the government will not HONOR it! So asa mana padung? diba padung sa wala! so good luck! and again.....good luck!
/sarcasm in the air.....
I am not sure what to make of the statement in bold. Ludicrous at its best.
P.S. Next time I won't feel obliged to answer your post even if you quote mine.