This would be the last warning to all who insults the HOMOSEXUALS.
Talk about the SAME S3X MARRIAGE and why you agree with it or why you dont .
Now back to topic.
This would be the last warning to all who insults the HOMOSEXUALS.
Talk about the SAME S3X MARRIAGE and why you agree with it or why you dont .
Now back to topic.
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Yes, ACCEPTANCE, RESPECT and EQUALITY.
Please make it clear that it is 'immoral' in the context of YOUR religion. Again, this issue is outside the bounds of most religion (except, perhaps, for those nga nag held og same s3x marriage). Don't worry, wala'y naay katungod manghilabot sa inyong simbahan other than the very people running it. And I guess they don't need help ruining it by themselves. [But then again, that is another topic.]![]()
So by your definition, back when Interracial Marriage was severely discriminated against and their offspring were viewed as an abomination, society was not to be blamed? Thank God we have moved past that. Now, Interracial marriages are no longer an issue in most nations and someday soon..so will same s.e.x marriage
Allow me to show you a picture.
and btw, there are other options aside from adopting.. ever heard of surrogacy?
spring/mods, naypa i close nalang ni kay di jud ni magdaog maabtan nalang ta sunod tuig... kay maski unsaon ug warning some people di jud patuo...
First, the very reason we are having this discussion is to have a general flow of ideas.. The core concept of having this discussion out in the open is for the purpose and benefit of those who are either on the fence and those who have not made up their minds yet if they are in favor or not when it come to marriage equality. Istorya provides an avenue for them to look at the issue from a different perspective than what they may be inclined to believe.
gets na?
Second, Ni respect man me sa inyung view no matter how narrow minded they may seem. You have made it VERY VERY clear you are not in favor of marriage equality, but that gives you no right to dominate the discussion and dismiss the opposing view.
In closing allow me to say that a person's right ends where his neighbor's right begins. When exercising your right (in this case free speech) impedes upon the basic rights of others or propagate hatred and discrimination then you are nothing more than a tyrant who thinks his/her rights supersede those of others
![]()
Similar Threads |
|