MERGED: RP-China Territorial Dispute, Related Events and Updates

[machinecult]

I see the chickenhawks have flocked here from the other thread.

I hope we will finally get to read what your plan of action is if the Chinese will send their state-of-the-art naval vessels and fighter planes flying overhead Panatag shoals, denying access to it. Instead of using metaphors and nationalistic rhetoric.

[mindtrickz]

mo migrate nlang ko kaysa mag fight2x pa jud

[mtawason]

kinsay walay igong basihan ang tsina nga istorya ra o ang sa pinas nga nalatid gayud sa atong pangobyerno nga nagtamod usab sa pamalaod sa tibook kalibutan. Lain-lain kita ug panglantaw kabahin sa atong pang gobyerno pero alang nako dako ang purohan nga makabaton kitag ligdong nga pamunoan. Ikaw unsay imoha?
Yuna ra nganong luwason mo man ang mga katawhan, sa ato pa alang nimo gubaton jud ta sa Tsina kay nagmagahi ang atong pamunoan sa ilahang baruganan?

unsa man imo basihan nga naka sulti ka ana? dili ko updated sa panghitabo? like unsa nga panghitabo? i get more info from the net..TV and radio do have biased anchors,,

ngano naka ingon manka nga garagara lang ang pagsokol nato sa china? kanusa man nahimong garagara ang pag barog sa atong katungod?

Aw mas mo prefer diay ka ug net bro, palihug lang ko basa ani:

China MUST enforce her sovereignty rights in the South China Sea - Page 5 - China Political & Defence Forum - Global Times Forum - Discuss China, Discuss the world

Edited: No doubt nga ni uyon ang China sa UNCLOS pero naay mga condition bro.

Ang pagsukol nga walay igo nga basehan bro is a form of gara2x.

[missingyouso]

mo migrate nlang ko kaysa mag fight2x pa jud

maayo mo oy kay maka-migrate mo. kami tawon maninguha lang mi nga mabuhi diri sa pilipinas. mao nang panalipdan lang namo kung unsay amo, kay pobre na gani, daugdaugon pa gyud

[baliko]

Oo. If ipanghatag na lang nato na basta-basta, mura na tag nagpasakop sa China.

[Romeojin]

i cant believe it there are people would vote NO... shame on you.

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Aw mas mo prefer diay ka ug net bro, palihug lang ko basa ani:

China MUST enforce her sovereignty rights in the South China Sea - Page 5 - China Political & Defence Forum - Global Times Forum - Discuss China, Discuss the world

No doubt nga nipirma ang China sa UNCLOS pero naay mga condition bro.

Ang pagsukol nga walay igo nga basehan bro is a form of gara2x.

We have UNCLOS as bases not some questionable ancient map. IF really there is a "condition" then why wouldn't they agree to settle it in the court?

[Sparrow Unit]

mo migrate nlang ko kaysa mag fight2x pa jud

mao ni klaseng tawo nga tapulan ug walay kaug-maon

[mtawason]

We have UNCLOS as bases not some questionable ancient map. IF really there is a "condition" then why wouldn't they agree to settle it in the court?

Upon ratification (7 June 1996)1/:

In accordance with the decision of the Standing Committee of the Eighth National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China at its nineteenth session, the President of the People's Republic of China has hereby ratified the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 and at the same time made the following statement:

1. In accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the People's Republic of China shall enjoy sovereign rights and jurisdiction over an exclusive economic zone of 200 nautical miles and the continental shelf.

2. The People's Republic of China will effect, through consultations, the delimitation of the boundary of the maritime jurisdiction with the States with coasts opposite or adjacent to China respectively on the basis of international law and in accordance with the principle of equitability.

3. The People's Republic of China reaffirms its sovereignty over all its archipelagos and islands as listed in article 2 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the territorial sea and the contiguous zone, which was promulgated on 25 February 1992.

4. The People's Republic of China reaffirms that the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning innocent passage through the territorial sea shall not prejudice the right of a coastal State to request, in accordance with its laws and regulations, a foreign State to obtain advance approval from or give prior notification to the coastal State for the passage of its warships through the territorial sea of the coastal State.

Declaration made after ratification (25 August 2006)

Declaration under article 298:

The Government of the People's Republic of China does not accept any of the procedures provided for in Section 2 of Part XV of the Convention with respect to all the categories of disputes referred to in paragraph 1 (a) (b) and (c) of Article 298 of the Convention.
Declarations or Statements upon UNCLOS ratification

[hulagway]

mo migrate nlang ko kaysa mag fight2x pa jud

balik lang unya kung OK na..