St. Theresa’s College sued!

[hmtpop]

nag read ko sa mga comment sa taga STC sa kadtong fb link nga ako gi post. So sad these Theresians are busy defending their schools while most outsiders hate their school.

Lain man sad kaayo kung di sila mudefend, diba? They know that most people are unaware about sa side sa mga madre. Halos tanan nagtuo gud na ang bikini ra'y hinungdan, which is clearly not the case. Ganahan ra sila na makibaw ang uban sa side pud sa ilang school kay naa man sad pud uban gud na grabe ra kaayo maka da ug judge, na as if nakaskwela sad sila didto ug as if kibaw sad sila sa tanan-tanan. It's their opinion, yes, pero people should look at both sides of the story sad before they go and say things that are offensive to both parties.

[vipvip68]

since balaod man na sa school bro, sila tanan nga taga sulod ang kasabot unsay meaning sa "ample body exposure".

So if the STC admin decides that wearing shorts in the mall or midriff nga shirt is already "ample body exposure" does that mean that we will just abide by their decision?

Academic freedom does not give them the right to deprive students of their rights.

[hmtpop]

mao na dha.....self-explanatory..so meaning lai lain ta ug interpretation sa rules, labi na ang rules on "Ample Body exposure" is ended subjective...so i assume na wala gyud gi usa usa ug explain sa mga parents ang rules.....

Naay ni post diri na mag orientation man kuno na sila. So it's safe to say na gi explain na ug tarong ang rules. In my previous statement man gud, I was assuming na dili sila mag hold ug ing-ana nga event. So kay naa man diay, di nata kaingon nga depende ra na sa interpretation sa parents.

[7DMM]

having dingdong and magnolia juice while on lurk mode

[istoryamember]

So if the STC admin decides that wearing shorts in the mall or midriff nga shirt is already "ample body exposure" does that mean that we will just abide by their decision?

Academic freedom does not give them the right to deprive students of their rights.

bro remember nga dili na basta2x pud gihimo nga balaod. And besides, if mao man gali na balaod nga wearing shorts is already ample body exposure, ngano man nga pa eskwelahon pa man imo anak diha nga in the first place kabalo naman ka nga dili na sakto? Maayo man ug gidali dali ni nilag himo nga balaod para lang jud dili ka paso ang 5 ka students. Dha na na eversince.

Plus what about this? "The photos posted were “sexually provocative” and had “gross disrespect to a woman’s dignity.”

[hmtpop]

So if the STC admin decides that wearing shorts in the mall or midriff nga shirt is already "ample body exposure" does that mean that we will just abide by their decision?

Academic freedom does not give them the right to deprive students of their rights.

It's not that the students are being deprived of their rights. They enrolled in that school, therefore, they should abide by the rules. Every school has their own set of rules jud baya so kung mao na ilang rules, wala na juy mahimo ang students but to follow. Kung mu defy sila, there will always be a consequence.

Feel gani nako lenient ra ang rules sa STC compared sa uban. Naa gani jud uban na dili pwede magka have ug FB acct ang mga bata. Oh diba.

[SamuraiArcher]

Naay ni post diri na mag orientation man kuno na sila. So it's safe to say na gi explain na ug tarong ang rules. I said that assuming na dili sila mag hold ug ing-ana nga event. So kay naa man diay, di nata kaingon nga depende ra na sa interpretation sa parents.

lets wait katong mi claim nga iya anak na-a sa STC..kung gi-unsa pag orient sa rules.....

[istoryamember]

naa pud ba kaha didto sa handbook no nga ignorance of the law excuses no one? kay kung bansay bansayon kada usa ang balaod, matay pila ka adlaw mahuman? Or maybe naa na didto sa ilang balaod nga if you have questions, feel free to ask And if you sign, it means you understand and agree to the rules. Basin mura ra pud ni ug terms and conditions diritso ra ta click I agree lol

[vipvip68]

bro remember nga dili na basta2x pud gihimo nga balaod. And besides, if mao man gali na balaod nga wearing shorts is already ample body exposure, ngano man nga pa eskwelahon pa man imo anak diha nga in the first place kabalo naman ka nga dili na sakto? Maayo man ug gidali dali ni nilag himo nga balaod para lang jud dili ka paso ang 5 ka students. Dha na na eversince.

Plus what about this? "The photos posted were “sexually provocative” and had “gross disrespect to a woman’s dignity.”

That's a matter of opinion... unless the pictures are shown we'll just have to take the STC admin's word for it. Lisod man sad i-release ang pictures since the kids' identities need to be kept.

[jansome26]

Ang judge kaha ani galabad ang ulo. either way kung asa iyang ruling grabe ang backlash hehehehehe