Yeah nevermind the 17-85mm, take the 17-55mm f2.8.. I myself is kinda regretting when I bought the Nikon 17-35mm f2.8 instead of the 17-55mm f2.8 because of the reach..(well at least I can use my 17-35mm f2.8 with film and quite obvious its sharper than the 17-55mm f2.Originally Posted by petey78
just like what CrasHBURN said. In the same manner Im in this group of the FF Nikon hopefuls.. so I decided to go by the 17-35mm f2.8 but if not with it.. I'd say I'll go for the 17-55mm f2.8
But if you can afford it... I know you can.. get the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 boss petey78



just like what CrasHBURN said. In the same manner Im in this group of the FF Nikon hopefuls.. so I decided to go by the 17-35mm f2.8 but if not with it.. I'd say I'll go for the 17-55mm f2.8
Reply With Quote
i just happened to save enough money for my lust of the RED ring in front of my lens so i got the 24-105is. if  i didnt have the money i would have kept it

