Probe on anti-Corona legislators sought

[amingb]

Probe on anti-Corona legislators sought » Nation » News | Philippine News | philstar.com

Lawyer Oliver Lozano asked the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate corruption allegation against congressmen who impeached Chief Justice Renato Corona.

Lozano filed the one-page letter complaint addressed to Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales this morning.

Asked why the complaint did not have any attached evidence to support the allegations, Lozano told reporters that it would be up to the Ombudsman to gather evidence in the course of its investigation.

Lozano reasoned that since the impeachment complaint was "based on just a suspicion", he was doing the same thing in his complaint before the Ombudsman.

"So it is also based on a suspicion that we are asking the Ombudsman to investigate the (allegation of) ill-gotten wealth against the (impeachment) prosecutors," Lozano said.

"We are just using what they used... You were the ones who started this," he said, referring to the prosecution.


NICE MR OLIVER LOZANO ... mao ni ang sugod sa Tuwad na Daan ...

[lhorenzoo]

i dont think this will prosper..but welcome this if ever madayon ni para makita sad ang baho sa mga nagprosecute og limpyo ba ni sila..

[b1 huck]

they keep on pulling the case out harder, but i don't see any progress...

[balipseyev]

binaslanay nalang ang gma buang ay... kasamok ba sa politika, tanan gusto makakwarta...

[estor_boot]

nobody takes oliver lozano seriously. i can't even believe someone would make thread for this.

[amingb]

Mao man gud ni Trending karon ... like Railroading and suspicion ... mao mani gusto sa Liberal Party e adopt ni nato sa tanan ...

[andreaalba30]

From his own mouth:
CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth
Read his formula for computing corruption
My exclusive
By Raïssa Robles

Prosecutors in the impeachment trial might not know they have a document they can refer to when they present ITRs and SALNs as evidence. It’s a document written by someone who happens to be named Renato C. Corona.
The document is Chief Justice Corona’s landmark decision on July 15, 2003 turning over the Marcoses’ loot stashed in Swiss banks to the Philippine government.
In that document, CJ Corona made some interesting points:
He said the burden of proof lies with the person being accused of having amassed such wealth.
He also said the court should disregard technicalities thrown by the defendant’s side.
And he said it was enough to compare a respondent’s SALNs (Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth) and ITRs (Income Tax Return) with the wealth in question to determine the latter’s illegal origin. If disclosed income and assets were far less than the questioned wealth, then the latter is ill-gotten.

Full text: raissa robles From his own mouth: CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth

[amingb]

From his own mouth:
CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth
Read his formula for computing corruption
My exclusive
By Raïssa Robles

Prosecutors in the impeachment trial might not know they have a document they can refer to when they present ITRs and SALNs as evidence. It’s a document written by someone who happens to be named Renato C. Corona.
The document is Chief Justice Corona’s landmark decision on July 15, 2003 turning over the Marcoses’ loot stashed in Swiss banks to the Philippine government.
In that document, CJ Corona made some interesting points:
He said the burden of proof lies with the person being accused of having amassed such wealth.
He also said the court should disregard technicalities thrown by the defendant’s side.
And he said it was enough to compare a respondent’s SALNs (Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth) and ITRs (Income Tax Return) with the wealth in question to determine the latter’s illegal origin. If disclosed income and assets were far less than the questioned wealth, then the latter is ill-gotten.

Full text: raissa robles From his own mouth: CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth

Nindot ni .. file another impeachment case sa Congress aron ma touch na nga Topic .. because that is already irrelevant to Article 2 ... saon ning mga Persecutor bright lang sa media grabi ilaha ebedenisya tons of evidence sure na jud a convict .. pag sugod sa trial na adjourn kay walay ebedinsiya .. puede diay na mga Yellow ? ....

Naa man gud tay Rules e Follow .. an impeachment court is not a Kangaroo Court .. labi na gamay ra biya ang Liberal Party diha senador ....

[æRLO]

From his own mouth:
CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth
Read his formula for computing corruption
My exclusive
By Raïssa Robles

Prosecutors in the impeachment trial might not know they have a document they can refer to when they present ITRs and SALNs as evidence. It’s a document written by someone who happens to be named Renato C. Corona.
The document is Chief Justice Corona’s landmark decision on July 15, 2003 turning over the Marcoses’ loot stashed in Swiss banks to the Philippine government.
In that document, CJ Corona made some interesting points:
He said the burden of proof lies with the person being accused of having amassed such wealth.
He also said the court should disregard technicalities thrown by the defendant’s side.
And he said it was enough to compare a respondent’s SALNs (Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth) and ITRs (Income Tax Return) with the wealth in question to determine the latter’s illegal origin. If disclosed income and assets were far less than the questioned wealth, then the latter is ill-gotten.

Full text: raissa robles From his own mouth: CJ Corona’s guidelines in the use of SALNs & ITRs to prove ill-gotten wealth

as seen in other forums, such as PEx.

what's your own inference on the matter, poster?