Why does the doctors of CGMA in hot seat?!

[æRLO]

---

d sla ma contemp kng ang medical abstract gamiton as aid to prove a premise for the defendant or plaintiff in court.

In my own view it is different from those doctors appeared on court (like SOCO, psychiatric, medical forensic specialist) to give testimonies to support the "minor notion" that leads to greater impact to win a case.

In the case of CGMA which questioned her medical condition as a center basis to approve or disapprove her clearance to go abroad for medical purpose. So if her doctor/s will not answer to the request in court then the court could contempt them.

It can't be contempt unless the court demanded they disclose medical records--we don't know if they discretely did that already either. They can't just voluntarily disclose information to the court because the court never asked for it. If the court does, and they refused without very legitimate reasons, that's contempt.

[bisan-unsa]

It can't be contempt unless the court demanded they disclose medical records--we don't know if they discretely did that already either. They can't just voluntarily disclose information to the court because the court never asked for it. If the court does, and they refused without very legitimate reasons, that's contempt.

mao gani ma contempt lng sila kng kinahanglan sa court den d sla mo sunod... mao bitaw contemp... but as far as i know na ngayo nman cguro ang court ani nga medical report d lng kay medical abstract... mao bitaw ng file ug TRO sa mga doktor para d "daw" mka sulti jud... pero naa nman na sa courte so ang courte na ang mo resolve... so mg wait nlng tah sa gifile nga TRO kng madayon or dli... para mka bahibaw natah sa sunod nga kabanata... hehehe

[inxss4]

bakakon man god sila.......

[Albrecht]

xempre hot seat jud sila kay controversial baya ang ilahang pasyente.. maquestion pud jud ang ilahang credibility regarding the matter if ghimo lang ba sila ug excuse para dili mapreso..^^