Hello sa tanan..pwede mangayo ug tabang? Naa man gud me assignment sa PolSci pero nagkamang man ako knowledge sa politics hehehe, I hope to get comments for these questions below.
1. Can you say that the case against GMA is tainted with "politics"? why or why not?
2. What do you think is/are the implication/s of this recent happening against GMA on the quality of governance in our country?
Lamats up ahead sa mga motabang nako ani...
your forum lives will be shorten if you act like monkeys. But please continue, please.....
so unsa man jud? nagCONSIDER palang si de lima or nagPLANo na?
mao man kaha na rason nganong porsigido kaau siya mo gukod ni gloria.
PS.
sa sunod basahon ug sabton nato ang tibook article sa balita dli ta mag assume na kabalo nata sa tibook balita tungod lang kay ni basa ta sa headline. uso biya karon ang ilang gitawag ug yellow journalism, number 1 example "De Lima confirms plan to seek Senate seat in 2013", ni CONFIRM na daw kono nga nag PLANo , nya diay to pag basa nimo sa article giconvince pa diay, giCONSIDER pa diay , mo consulta pa diay cya sa iyang amahan.
at this point in time, "consider" raman jud ang bid for a seat. 2013 pa kaha noh. Anybody who's familiar with the decorum in politics knows that mag-pahumot jud na una before making a daring leap. Otherwise, you're painting yourself a bulls-eye if mu "confirm" dayun. You have to have something to show. 2011 pa gani, naa na siyay "considerations"--obvious na kaha nah.
Okay, basaha sunod ang catch sa article. if the Cojuangcos say they will abide to the rulings, why is there a motion for reconsideration. Even if they put forward a reason that its for "clarification" purposes, that opens up another question. Why do they say they will agree to the rulings nga wa paman diay na clarified ang clauses sa case. Hope they do abide though.
dli lagi ta mag assume. lisod kaau nang mag assume makuryente nya ta.
ayaw ug parehasa si de lima ni gloria nga padili-dili daw kono modagan pero tan-awa unsay gibuhat, nidagan sagolan pa panikas.
so unsa man jud? nagCONSIDER pa or nagPLANo na?
Last edited by M@rv|n; 11-27-2011 at 03:51 PM.
Similar Threads |
|