Was the decision to postpone the summit due to a storm a right decision? Was the storm really the reason why the Summit was postponed?
Before anyone answers YES or NO, consider the following that happened:
- Several provinces have been ravaged by the storm; Boracay was not even spared
- There were some who died and got injured
As of now, all of the government's attention are on the victims of the storm including the ones in Albay which was previously ravaged by Reming.
Had the government pursued with the Summit, would PGMA herself put her focus on it (ASEAN) or at the victims of the storm?
Now that the government is being criticized by some because of the summit's postponement, would the government also be criticized by the same people if the so-called "lavish" summit was pursued in the midst of death and destruction?
Think again.
