Secretary of Justice denied the Supreme Court!

[Hammer_and_Sickle]

wala na jud ang pinas,...wala na'y rule of law,

[KlaytoN]

The concept regarding the Rule of Law is very much subjective to each and own perspective. It can be interpreted in many ways depende kung kinsay naa sa puder..

One thing that cannot be changed is the Spirit of the Law..

[wildfire1203]

mao ni gi ingon na real constitutional crisis..

Wala jud ayo ang atoa system of govt...

walay batasan ang executive.. kay mag buot sa judicial

dapat mag ilis nata govt. jud if by kudeta! fine!

samtang buhi ang 1987 cons... wala tay ayo!
protektado kaayu sa mga Aquinos.

Its time na mausab na way of life sa mga pinoy....

change of govt.. change of system!!

If you want changes,begin it in yourself.

[peewee_toot]

^^maskin unsa-on pa nimo og change sa imong self, kung bulay-og ang mga nagpadagan sa nasud, wala gihapon nay kwenta. let's be realistic...

[peewee_toot]

change of govt.. change of system!!

only a bloody revolution can do that...

[tophat]

only a bloody revolution can do that...

this system is so filthy only the blood of a revolution and a civil war could wash it clean..

I didn't know RESPECT for the supreme court is subject. You can disagree with the manner they are appointed, but at the end of the day, they are there legally and under conduct of the constitution--if there are objections, and they need to be removed from office, do it under scrutiny and conduct of the constitution.

the manner, intent and purpose for which those specific people were appointed defeats the sacredness of the constitution itself!

Born last night? I think that's taking it too far. At least they understand the repercussions of a constitutional crisis.

Is anarchy okay for you? Were you born just last night?

anarchy is what you deserve with a mindset like that. personally, i would like to think this country needs cleansing of those kinds.

there is no such thing as a constitutional crisis with pushing what is fair and just above all the crap that evil brings forth...!

[æRLO]

the manner, intent and purpose for which those specific people were appointed defeats the sacredness of the constitution itself!

What? Speculation nasad? Again, they are the SC, it is their implied powers to interpret the constitution. There is no regard for the "manner, intent AND purpose". So you mean to say, I can break any of the statutes in the constitution because the SCs were appointed in a questionable "manner, intent and purpose"? Will the government be justified in taking any of our Bill of Rights just because of the same reason?

[tophat]

^^You are free to choose to break the law. Just be willing to face the consequences of your actions.

What I have written is based on facts I derive from sources that may not be available to the general public. My kind do not speculate.. I leave that to impotent loud mouths.
In the context of this thread, Sec. of Justice did the righteous thing !

[trollolol]

there is no such thing as a constitutional crisis with pushing what is fair and just above all the crap that evil brings forth...!

According to who, your imaginary special sources? You are certifiable. The checks and balances between the 3 branches are in place for a reason.

[return85]

rule of law... mao dapat masunod,,, dili puro pasikat,,, dili puro inisog,, PRide,,,, MASKI your doing a righteous thing or a heroic act dapat naa jud rule of Law,,,