
Originally Posted by
unsay_ngalan_nimo
This is very interesting isnt it, anyway the problem is the SC did not even rule whether the DOJ has a right or not to put GMA on hold departure list they made restraining order it not even a TRO becuase it suspend the effectivity of the circular...
Yes there is no case against GMA yet but she is under investigation....
Sometime our laws can be very inconvenient in search for justice, dont you think?
this is i think a copy of the decision
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprud...199046_TRO.pdf
the dissenting opinon is interesting is worth reading though.
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprud...046_SERENO.pdf
I can't understand how the Constitution can be made secondary to the actions of DOJ and the Admin... Does that mean that the Admin and Doj can inhibit rights at their whim, rights ascertained by the Consitution, and that the person must resort to the interpretations of SC to rule if its Constitutional or not? Isn't that contrary to the purpose of Constitution? In that sense, the power has shifted from the citizens to the government....