@Luthienne:
lol. So I wasn't the only one who noticed the redundancy.
this is the line --------- cross it. i dare you
actually the title is inaccurate, not redundant...Originally Posted by Zerone_null
"photograph of a photographer being photographed" means that the photo shows a photographer photographing another photographer, i.e., the photo should show 2 photographers as the subject...obviously that's not the case here, as pointed out by Luthienne.....
nagpa-pilosopo lang....![]()

Hehehe.. Got you! Hehehe.. Yes you're right Minuano27 and Luthienne.. Both of you guys are correct.. As I am aware the subject should have at least 2 photographers.. In this case, the title is still correct.. I learned this from a known Chicago Tribune photographer.. When you dont have a perfect photo, make it up with the title.. Sometimes if you don't have an interesting photo, be creative in the title.. keep the viewer sticking on your photo by adding mystery on why's that the title?..
Did it cause obviously I don't have a nice shot on that one.. Hehehe..
Thanks for the concern guys.. Hehehe.. The trick is working though.. Hehehe..
if i sounded pilosopo, do forgive me. thanks for pointing out the right word, Minuano.
Ian, i thought that was a great shot. only the photographer should've been placed to the right part of the pic to complement the blur of the passing car.
keep those photos coming, people.![]()

Nice new pylon!
Ha ha ha! Korek.Originally Posted by petey78
What is there to critique? He he he
Maybe edit out those power lines?Originally Posted by Isabella Rain
![]()

Great observation boss laagan.
Similar Threads |
|