70-200mm f2.8 lens Community

[vanix09]

---

naa say kasabihang "sharpness is in the eyes of the beholder"

[yel.Imba]

if u can find a 80-200 F2.8 AF-S, which is rare nowadays, then it will AF on the D5K. this 80-200 F2.8 AF-S was replaced by the 70-200 VR1.

it looks like this

hala naa diay noh. try nako sa singapore bsin naa. thanks sa info boss. mao ni katong push and pull?

[azinec]

@ yel.imba - nope, its not the push pull version. this is still a 2-ring version. its a discontinued lens because it was replaced by the 70-200 VR1.

[cmontoya]

Both Canon and Nikon's 80-200 2.8 still command premium prices sadly T_T

[TYTUZ]

i like ds.

[deive]

haita sa pics woie. unsa na nga 70-200 ang gigamit? mu.depend ba sad sa body ang pagka hait sa pic?
sorry for the noob question. XD

[azinec]

more like mu depend sa ka paspas mu AF sa imo lens considering this is a moving subject your aiming at.

[randymunz]

i like ds.

thanks sa pag like bro.

[randymunz]

haita sa pics woie. unsa na nga 70-200 ang gigamit? mu.depend ba sad sa body ang pagka hait sa pic?
sorry for the noob question. XD

kun kana ako pics imo pasabot bro 70-200 nga tamron na.
sa imo 2nd question, sa ako naobserbahan D90 MAN AKO GAMIT ANA NYA SAUNA NGA BODY nya karon d7000 ANG KAHAIT NYA PAREHAS RAMAN.
Bisag unsa man ako magamit nga body hait man jud kuha...

[cmontoya]

Mga bro, I noticed that my Tamron 28-75 (I know off topic but bear with me please) at 2.8 is sharp only from 28-50 but needs to be at F4 beyond 50mm to sharpen. Are you experiencing same with the 70-200 2.8? That is, is there a range of focal length from 70-200 that is equally sharp at 2.8 before you need to narrow down by a stop or two?

This 28-75 2.8 behavior is in-sync with written and YouTube vids so I knew what I was getting into when I bought it. I just bought it so I have an events lens kay lisod kaayo prime kung huot ang venue

Thanks.