^^exactly, they need funds for 2013.
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				yes and aside from that, the reason why the subject is being defied was because of the business entities which may be affected,
let say for example those businesses under the flyover will experience a large loss of their income since the people passing by will dramatically decrease.
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				^^business people are indeed at the forefront of those against the flyovers. they are not actually against it per se but rather the swiftness of its implementation even with its flawed justifications and without regard for the overall impact on the overall traffic situation. these businessmen (many of them very successful) know what they speak of. they want to see plans, not just for a particular intersection, but for the whole city and even province as a whole. politicians don't see it this way but rather just want to earn pogi points from the voters aside from the indubitable fact that they will earn from this. I mean really, would anybody doubt there will be kickbacks on this?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				they are against these flyovers because they are band-aid solutions.
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				haha nice ayo tang mga pinoy oi, bat ganun kung way buhaton ang gobyerno magreklamo..pero kung naa pud buhaton ang gobyerno kay magreklamo gihapon..haha bat ganun?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				sa katong sa carmelites ky dili sia ganahn nga naay fly over ky murag ma invade dawilang privacy. same as sa asilo sd cgro na. tsk2x. hangol mga madreha.
 
			
			
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				para sa ako, dli man jud solution ang flyover kay grabi raman gihapon ka taas ang trapik sa flyover diha padung countrymall ug kanang flyover padung ayala igka rush hours. tan-awa ng reclamation area o, nindot raman ang dagan sa trapik. ang dapat jud unta buhaton sa gobyerno kay road-widening ug strict implementation sa mga No Parking areas. kini man gud flyover kay mas barato siya compared sa roadwidening kay ila paman bayaran ang mga tag-iya sa yuta ug 'just amount' kay kung dili, unya naay usa ka tag-iya na dili mu-baligya kay ma-put on hold jud ang project na roadwidening, gasto na unya dugay pajud masugdan kay mag-hearing2 paman. kung flyover man gud kay dritso na tukod, huwat nalang ug budget na gipaburot, aw tukod na, maong mufavor jud ang gobyerno ani. pero ang usa pud sa nakapait aning flyover kay luoy kaayo ang mga establishments na maagian, malugi na gani, mubarato pa jud ang presyo sa yuta.
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				mag flyover cla dha asilo? haha ay nlng kay tag 2 lanes ra gani ang dalan dha. huot kaau na.
pero ako na obserbahan ok rman dili butngan flyover kay ang traffic ok ra mn antos lng gyud.
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				nireklamo ang taga Asilo og ang uban tawo k ala man sila gpahibaw daan na pila na ka years na diay ilang gplano na project.. morag na bulaga nalang sila og kaahat pag laid out sa proposed project..
not to be negative about it but ila jud na i-pursue ang project k naa naman gud nila ang money and perhaps, nagasto na nila ang fraction of it so panindigan jud na nila...
Last edited by beyee; 11-07-2011 at 09:54 AM.
"People who love to eat are always the BEST people."
Julia Child
 
			
			
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
 Re: Why are they against "overpass"?
				In every government project, there will always be those against it for whatever reason. That is the essence of a democracy. We can never all agree.
| Similar Threads | 
 |