
Originally Posted by
mannyamador
You make a claim, you should back it up. Even someone with half a brain can understand that. But since you can't figure it out, I guess you don't even have that much.

LOLZ ... saying VIGILANTES existed to fight CRIME is a CLAIM ? Thats a FACT mannyboy .... dont be too hard for yourself , give yourself a break accept FACTS . Remember your suking superheroes ??
So prove it. Show me who are the vigilantes, who their victims are, when and where it took place.
Oh, but then then you DON'T know who's killing whom, right? You're just
assuming that the vigilantes kill only criminals, but you have
ZERO proof of that. That's an idiotic way of doing things. I don't make any such assumptions. It doesn't matter to me who is doing the killing because ALL these killings are wrong. I don't have to justify any of them. But since you claim the vigilantes are doing good, you have to prove the vigilantes are really killing only the so-called "chronic criminals". And you have
FAILED to do so.
Miserably too.
I never failed in way how I relayed ideas to you . You ASSUMED because anything that crosses your path is WRONG because mannyboy is always RIGHT . Remember when I said are we on the same page ? You keep on blabbing on that " vigilante style victim in brgy Caretta " . We are talking about VIGILANTES and not one , two or three operatives or agents .
Then I asked you to answer or to spoonfeed you for the NTH time , copy and paste the question and mark the answer . To remind you again with that , dont answer it with a TRUE or FALSE . COnclusion ? What does nearly all if not all of the VIGILANTE STYLE VICTIMS have in common ?
You just contradicted yourself again! This seems to be a habit of yours. Perhaps you should seek professional help.
LOLZ ... that is only according to you . Ulyanin ka na MANNYBOY .... eat your vegetables right .
I can easily ask you also the same question . Provide evidence that the VIGILANTE killed those BYSTANDERS according to the media . You didnt even asked your media friends yet and here you are so high and almighty . Dont be shy .... they are your friends afterall .
None? I thought so. Brainless form of argument.
LOLZ .... refer to the post above . If its too hard for you then I will spoonfeed you again , why did I used the word CHRONIC to associate the issues of the victims in my argument ?
A criminal record is for a PAST crime. That does not make a person a wanted criminal NOW. And don't forget the innocent bystanders (three of them females) who were injured and the tombstone maker who had no criminal record at all.
How did you know that the victims are considered GOOD CHRISTIANS and HONEST CITIZENS now ?? How did you know that eventhough it was specified that a victim whom is a tombmaker by trade is not a " SALOT " of the society ?? Wealthy people even commit crimes to make ends meet , how much more on a TOMBMAKER ?? There is a fineline between the words CHRONIC/CAREER CRIMINALS and EX-CONVICTS and I dont think there is a need for me to spoonfeed you again .
BTW ... good job on your article ... but isnt it funny to post something that you agree with but at the same time is bias on opinions because they are the very ones INVOLVED !! If they only did what they are supposed to do and live with their MISSION STATEMENT of to PROTECT and SERVE lolz .... DEATH RIDER in a SKYGO need not to be commissioned .