Do you know who Ron Paul is?

[tokidoki_v2.0]

PS: The significance of this man involves the future of US...and whatever happens to US, affects us all... Ever since, i knew Obama was just for show...

I can see why you are siding with SD.

And this is so American of you to push your problems on the rest of the world. Like Bush's war on terror: "If you are not with us, you are against us."

Or his "This was an act of war not against america but against the world."

The reality here is this was America's problem. This was an act of war against AMERICA.

Hilig kaayo sila makikiramay sa ubang nasod. Even in your weakest points you are still bullies! A bunch whining cry babies.

Dako pa kaayo ug drama atong mga sundalo namatay sa afghanistan pero nobody pointed out the countless lives those soldier took. if americans kill someone it is an accomplishment. if an american gets killed the whole world must mourn with them.

jeezus!

you claim that US affects us all. the REALITY is Asia went well without them. Sa sobra sa katapulan nila halos tanang serbisyo himuan ug call center! most of them are too stupid to figure out how to tie their own shoelaces

[emow]

I can see why you are siding with SD.

And this is so American of you to push your problems on the rest of the world. Like Bush's war on terror: "If you are not with us, you are against us."

Or his "This was an act of war not against america but against the world."

The reality here is this was America's problem. This was an act of war against AMERICA.

Hilig kaayo sila makikiramay sa ubang nasod. Even in your weakest points you are still bullies! A bunch whining cry babies.

Dako pa kaayo ug drama atong mga sundalo namatay sa afghanistan pero nobody pointed out the countless lives those soldier took. if americans kill someone it is an accomplishment. if an american gets killed the whole world must mourn with them.

jeezus!

you claim that US affects us all. the REALITY is Asia went well without them. Sa sobra sa katapulan nila halos tanang serbisyo himuan ug call center! most of them are too stupid to figure out how to tie their own shoelaces

OMG... Listen to yourself and reread what you have posted and search about Ron Paul's advocacy....im sure you'll be embarassed...now who said about researching first?

[tokidoki_v2.0]

OMG... Listen to yourself and reread what you have posted and search about Ron Paul's advocacy....im sure you'll be embarassed...now who said about researching first?

this is not research bro. this is opinion. ayaw palaban ug research if spontaneous ang response. that is pathetic.

your beloved ron paul lost. deal with it.

and again. just because he lost you have to be a sourpuss about it and automatically conclude a conspiracy.

now who's embarrassed now? you've got no ground to stand on that's why you run to third party individuals. I cannot be embarrassed over a LOSER advocate.

never mess with a guy who knows what he's talking about bro. especially if you're the type of guy who cowers and hides under the data of others. all my statements are my own bro. i do not rely on research. i use my own observation as basis.

in short, walang kay sariling pangisip. mao na post post nalang ug mga youtube ug mga links.

[emow]

this is not research bro. this is opinion. ayaw palaban ug research if spontaneous ang response. that is pathetic.

your beloved ron paul lost. deal with it.

and again. just because he lost you have to be a sourpuss about it and automatically conclude a conspiracy.

now who's embarrassed now? you've got no ground to stand on that's why you run to third party individuals.

never mess with a guy who knows what he's talking about bro. especially if you're the type of guy who cowers and hides under the data of others. all my statements are my own bro. i do not rely on research. i use my own observation as basis.

in short, walang sariling pangisip.

wait wait wait....he lost? is that the issue that you see? right...namecalling, you sure are good at that.... i never knew im dealing with someone that low to insert namecalling in his arguments... You don't rely on research? Everything relies on research...so basing only on your own infallible natural observations, you can derive your conclusion? no wonder...

[tokidoki_v2.0]

wait wait wait....he lost? is that the issue that you see? right...namecalling, you sure are good at that.... i never knew im dealing with someone that low to insert namecalling in his arguments...

oh, loser is not name calling bro. that's what you call someone who LOST in his endeavor. get it? LOSER as in someone who lost.

namecalling? what do you your opinion about obama? oh, right, that is sourgraping and name calling.

if i'm a namecaller you're a hypocrite. Even religion looks down on hypcorites.

You don't rely on research? Everything relies on research...so basing only on your own infallible natural observations, you can derive your conclusion? no wonder...

as opposed to what? hiding under other people's work to which you absolutely have NO IDEA about what is going on. As someone in the other thread said: You are an OUTSIDER over things you do NOT understand.

You can preach about ron paul all you want, bro, but the fact still remains you are on the outside looking in.

My personal observation is far more dependable than your relying on third party terms because you can't formulate your own works.

[tokidoki_v2.0]

while we're in the issue of low, there's nothing lower than a sore loser and his advocates.

[emow]

oh, loser is not name calling bro. that's what you call someone who LOST in his endeavor. get it? LOSER as in someone who lost.

namecalling? what do you your opinion about obama? oh, right, that is sourgraping and name calling.

if i'm a namecaller you're a hypocrite. Even religion looks down on hypcorites.



as opposed to what? hiding under other people's work to which you absolutely have NO IDEA about what is going on. As someone in the other thread said: You are an OUTSIDER over things you do NOT understand.

You can preach about ron paul all you want, bro, but the fact still remains you are on the outside looking in.

My personal observation is far more dependable than your relying on third party terms because you can't formulate your own works.

i meant the sourpuss... sorry bout the confusion, should have structured it for you to understand... its a very derogatory term, often used by bullies like Bill O'Reilly to impose themselves over the issue... I'm not hiding bro, im sharing the info i got... what's wrong with you? Are you gonna police the internet now because much of it comes from secondhand sources? I bet not all the knowledge you get are your own, much of it is from other sources but the final analysis will be yours... I shared an info and its upto to the end viewers to do what they learn... Tell me then, what is your observation?

-are you just here to bash on me? lol

[tokidoki_v2.0]

^^ ahm, no. seriously. you were trying to play on the fact that what affects the US affects us, when in fact it is further from reality. And it is a statement somewhat reminiscent of Bush's "you are either with us or against us".

I don't see us having any problems because of the US, bro. their problems are their problems alone. if you're talking bullies that's what they are, trying to impose their suffering on the world.

the world has long been disillusioned by the americans. if there is one positive effect of 9/11 it would be to tell the world that america is not invincible after all. in fact, one filipino writer wrote an article about how hypocritical the rest of the world was when they said they sympathize with americans and yet at the back of their heads they were saying: "hmp. so you guys aren't so tough after all."

but to stay on the topic, i have no issues with ron paul since i don't follow his updates. i am only reacting to your last sentence, which if have quoted.

[xabistuff]

c ron paul s a republican nga against the federal reserve. gusto niya ebalik ang paghimo og kwarta (US dollar) sa goberno og dli sa usa ka private corporation (federal reserve).

[emow]

^^ ahm, no. seriously. you were trying to play on the fact that what affects the US affects us, when in fact it is further from reality. And it is a statement somewhat reminiscent of Bush's "you are either with us or against us".

I don't see us having any problems because of the US, bro. their problems are their problems alone. if you're talking bullies that's what they are, trying to impose their suffering on the world.

the world has long been disillusioned by the americans. if there is one positive effect of 9/11 it would be to tell the world that america is not invincible after all. in fact, one filipino writer wrote an article about how hypocritical the rest of the world was when they said they sympathize with americans and yet at the back of their heads they were saying: "hmp. so you guys aren't so tough after all."

but to stay on the topic, i have no issues with ron paul since i don't follow his updates. i am only reacting to your last sentence, which if have quoted.

To summarize Ron Paul for you, he is against what america has been for the last 2 decades... never wanted to be a global guardian and nation grabber and war mongerer.... but to dismiss US effect on world, especially on economy is surely being ignorant.... how do you determine the value of our current fiat currency? that one question alone should make you aware of its profound implications...