Apprehension of mufflers and HID Headlamps(sa mga hadlok madakpan)

[EarlJoshua]

---

unsa dapat ang kelvin sa hid kit para dili kau sakit sa mata? diba naa na mga kelvins?

[bahiista]

unsa dapat ang kelvin sa hid kit para dili kau sakit sa mata? diba naa na mga kelvins?

4100-4500k maoy nindot gyud..usually gamit sa mga car manufacturers...i have an 8000k projector HID which is pra nako less lumens but choy tanawon

[D6045]

I have 4k na yellow hid with highbeam regular halogen bulb...yellowish mn nka butang..nya ang yellow ani boss, dakpon ko ani boss?

[Omicron]

Nawa sa HID "Should not be dazzling", kana grabeh kaayo HID diha maayo unta inyo nang e pa adjust ang angle kay perti gyud sakita sa mata.

kani jud. uban ky pataka rag high. kalagot. inconsiderate kaayo.

[ZikE]

wat if bro kung moagi raka sa danao, gikan ka cebu padulong ka sa bantayan....dakpon japon ka? nya impound imong motor?

timing² lang jd na cya sir... kong ma kit.an kag enforcer hinay² lang pa dagan

[abayerds]

naay ma print version ani bay, pwede e post...kay ako ebutang kauban sa rehistro sa motor..

[S i L e N c E]

naka print na jud kog copy ani. Thanks.

[dookie3283]

maau ni oh pra ma aware ang mga motorista sa mga mangutong na checkpoint or police etc...

[Xie]

mau gyud ni especially mga baratohon og motor, kutob ra tingog. maypa bmw na motor sa akoang migo hilum kaau sa tanan, pero kanang mga barotohon dira na saba kay katawan ra. Tinuod gyud matud pa sa akoang migo "kanang mga saba og tambutso mga insecure rana sa ilang mga pakauwaw na rides.

[JX]

The first point is that motorcycles differ radically from cars in their relationship to primary and secondary safety. Primary safety is the capability to avoid hazards. For example, a vehicle with better brakes has better primary safety. Secondary safety is being able to survive accidents. For example, large heavy cars have better secondary safety than pedal cycles. Motorcycles naturally have better primary safety than cars: they can escape through smaller gaps; have better acceleration; have better control ergonomics give effectively faster reactions; have fewer blind spots; the higher head position gives a better view of traffic in all directions; they can move around more to exploit different views. But motorcycles naturally have worse secondary safety than cars. Now for the philosophy, the attitude of drivers/riders towards safety ranges between two extremes. On the one extreme we have the active in-control person who trusts his wits and skill to avoid accidents. This kind of person wants the best possible primary safety to give the greatest possible scope to his wits and skill. On the other extreme we have the passive victim person who thinks that there is no way to avoid other idiots having accidents involving him, and so wants the best possible secondary safety in order to best survive the inevitable accidents. The passive victim type will want to drive the largest heaviest most crash-proof car they can get their hands on. The active in-control type will want a vehicle with the best performance. In cars this is some kind of sports car. The extreme is a motorcycle. Thus, comparing cars with motorcycles, bikes are naturally suited to the active in-control type who prefers primary safety, whereas cars are better suited to the passive victim type who can't avoid accidents. So what about loud pipes? The argument in favor of loud pipes is that because you can't avoid all the idiots out there, you are better off making a loud noise to force them to notice you.