What would Jesus do?

[pinoy_09]

---

Jesus is out there working to save people.

Jesus is more concern with the salvation of our soul.

AND sufferings and pains are God's judgment to humanity.

Ow really? You seem to know how god thinks and what Jesus' plans are for humanity. Kudos for knowing the "truth".

[pinoy_09]

Just wait bro... Its Not yet the end, 2nd half pa tah

Wait? Humans have been waiting for a couple thousand years. Generations have passed, and yet there is no "GOD" in sight. Kutob ra diay ni sa huna-huna ug emosyon ning inyong gitawag nga "ginoo"? Or could it simply be that HE DOESN'T EXIST, mao walay ginoo nga makita? I think it's the latter.

[yanong_banikanhon]

Wait? Humans have been waiting for a couple thousand years. Generations have passed, and yet there is no "GOD" in sight. Kutob ra diay ni sa huna-huna ug emosyon ning inyong gitawag nga "ginoo"? Or could it simply be that HE DOESN'T EXIST, mao walay ginoo nga makita? I think it's the latter.

Sama ra gud pud na sa science, bay.

Humans have been waiting for so many years sa mga scientific answers sa ilang mga pangutana. Simple questions like why does life exist?, why did inanimate molecules of carbon, nitrogen, hygrogen and oxygen stick together, become self-organizing and become the first living organism? how can a mindless cell understand the genetic language and execute the instructions encoded in the DNA?

Pila na ba ka scientific paper ang gi-reject sa mga scientific community kay sayop ang tubag? Dili na maihap. Could it simply be that there are questions that cannot be answered by naturalistic explanations and atheists are just using science to fill the gap?

If that's the case, then atheism is also based on faith. Kay pareha man ta nagrely sa atong mga pagtoo, imbis nga mag-contest kinsa'y kinatas-ag ihi, isn't it wise to respect each other's belief ?

[pinoy_09]

Sama ra gud pud na sa science, bay.

Humans have been waiting for so many years sa mga scientific answers sa ilang mga pangutana. Simple questions like why does life exist?, why did inanimate molecules of carbon, nitrogen, hygrogen and oxygen stick together, become self-organizing and become the first living organism? how can a mindless cell understand the genetic language and execute the instructions encoded in the DNA?

Pila na ba ka scientific paper ang gi-reject sa mga scientific community kay sayop ang tubag? Dili na maihap. Could it simply be that there are questions that cannot be answered by naturalistic explanations and atheists are just using science to fill the gap?

But has science concluded that it knows the answer to things that are undiscovered?

[santopaps]

@florigaga, just wondering, why bother posting or making a thread like this? if you dont care....tsk tsk tsk

I know he cares brod but frustrated lang tingali sya karon nga time. Thats why wala na syay lain nga mabuhat, blaming GOD nalang!

[santopaps]

But has science concluded that it knows the answer to things that are undiscovered?

LIke the origin of the universe bro? undiscovered man jud nah.

Huwat sa mo ug pila pa ka milliion years para matubag ninyo inyong pangutana about the universe kay basin wala pa mo mo-evolve ug maayo!

[yanong_banikanhon]

But has science concluded that it knows the answer to things that are undiscovered?

No. But atheists firmly believe that science has the ALL the answers. They believe that every possible question have naturalistic explanations. According to them, anything that transcends the naturalistic point of view is not real.

[pinoy_09]

[/B]If that's the case, then atheism is also based on faith. Kay pareha man ta nagrely sa atong mga pagtoo, imbis nga mag-contest kinsa'y kinatas-ag ihi, isn't it wise to respect each other's belief ?
[/COLOR]

Of course, it all boils down to RESPECT. But that doesn't mean we should just shut our mouths up and advocate for religious tolerance. In fact, we as "atheists" (although I hate to call myself an atheist), should be against religious tolerance because religious dogma often slows down the progress of science and critical thinking.

So yes, it is fine to criticize religious belief and dogma just like it was fine for the Catholics to burn the non-believers.

[santopaps]

Wait? Humans have been waiting for a couple thousand years. Generations have passed, and yet there is no "GOD" in sight. Kutob ra diay ni sa huna-huna ug emosyon ning inyong gitawag nga "ginoo"? Or could it simply be that HE DOESN'T EXIST, mao walay ginoo nga makita? I think it's the latter.

JUST WAIT BRO! kung gusto jud ka makahibaw sa existence sa Ginoo kay gusto man jud ka mochallenge sa iyaha, then try ug ambak sa bridge...para moatubang naka niya ug sayo2!

God is a Spirit bro, in that dili ta makasabot about sa iyaha kay dili man nato makita BUT we feel His presence (for those who believes). That's why HE revealed himself in the person of Christ for us to know Him...Jesus is the image of the invisible GOD. If dili gihapon ka motuo about Jesus Christ, either wait nalang kanus-a kutob imong life or wait for million years til ma discover sa imong atheistic science ang iyang existence. kana kung makahuwat ka

[pinoy_09]

No. But atheists firmly believe that science has the ALL the answers. They believe that every possible question have naturalistic explanations. According to them, anything that transcends the naturalistic point of view is not real.

Maybe some atheists believe that. I don't share the same beliefs. I don't believe science has ALL the answers. Not all atheists think alike.