What would Jesus do?

[orcgod]

---

sure but can you produce him(lapu lapu)? hahaha.

God is real its in the Bible, just like you, your proof for lapu lapu is what? a book.

but you can never see Mt. Everest if you wont follow certain procedures,would you? same thing with God, follow the bible's procedure. So are you willing to see God, let's start first with faith, if you want I can conduct a bible study for you.

sure, its a misguided faith, moderate muslims would agree with me on this. My faith is biblical, it follows to where the evidence leads.

oh Lapu lapu is dead sir. Maybe your GOD can bring him back to life, haha.

So where is your GOD right now sir? or are we Just TALK here. TALK is cheap you know.

Im not the expert when it comes to GOD, you are, right? so if your GOD is true, where is HE?

[nowpress*]

Sir, do you even understand what BURDEN OF PROOF means? or should i educate you?

20 years na ko nga Christian and have been in real debates. i can even spot logicla fallacies in your arguments nga wa nimo mabantayan.

but para malingaw ka sige daw educate me about burden of proof,hahaha.

[florigaga]

but your bible was created by Man

i've been saying this quote a thousand times

"THE BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON RELIGION. IF YOU PROPOSE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING, YOU SHOULD USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN DEFENSE OF IT'S EXISTENCE, OTHERWISE, I HAVE NO REASON TO LISTEN TO YOU"

[SioDenz]

calamities like that happened because of what people did. Don't blame our Jesus if what they did was taking it's toll on them.

If Bad things Happen = Where is God?
If Good Things Happen = Its a natural Scientific Process..

[nowpress*]

oh Lapu lapu is dead sir. Maybe your GOD can bring him back to life, haha.

So where is your GOD right now sir? or are we Just TALK here. TALK is cheap you know.

hahaha, but the premise of the argument is kong maka produce ba? di ba mao man na imong gi ask, hahahaha. you failed. study logical fallacies before you hit on me.

kita ka sa flow sa imong arguments, its called non-sequitor. google it.

like I said if you want to see Mt.Everest there is a procedure to follow, do you want to see God? there is a procedure to follow. mamatay nya ka kong makakita ka sa Ginoo, no sinner can stand in his presence, sa bible bisan kinsa nga naay sala cannot stand sa presence sa Ginoo, mamatay sila not bcos gi patay sila sa Ginoo but bcos that's the the narture of his Holy Presence. Just like fire ba kong mo stand gani ka sa sunog patay jud ka.

any more questions?

[orcgod]

20 years na ko nga Christian and have been in real debates. i can even spot logicla fallacies in your arguments nga wa nimo mabantayan.

but para malingaw ka sige daw educate me about burden of proof,hahaha.

Oh, so I see, you dont UNDERSTAND what BURDEN of PROOF is all about.

ok, lets say, there's a Billionaire, and his daughter is kidnapped, but the Billionaire doesnt know who kidnapped his daughter, and the location of his daughter, and if his daughter is still alive.

2 hours later, phone rings, he answers the phone, Kidnapper demands 2 million dollars.

Father asks, is my daughter alive? kidnapper says YES. Father asks, CAN I HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF?

so Im the FATHER who's daughter is KIDNAPPED, and you are the KIDNAPPER who has my daughter.

So in laymans term sir, I am a person who doesnt have a GOD, you have a GOD, so wheres the PROOF of your GOD?

[nowpress*]

but your bible was created by Man

i've been saying this quote a thousand times

"THE BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON RELIGION. IF YOU PROPOSE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING, YOU SHOULD USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN DEFENSE OF IT'S EXISTENCE, OTHERWISE, I HAVE NO REASON TO LISTEN TO YOU"

really a thousand times? tsk tsk looy pod, study more para maka sabot ka kung unsa ng burden of proof. here is a hint ay...di lang na para sa positive claim but also sa negative propositions. gets?

[SioDenz]

but your bible was created by Man

i've been saying this quote a thousand times

"THE BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON RELIGION. IF YOU PROPOSE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING, YOU SHOULD USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN DEFENSE OF IT'S EXISTENCE, OTHERWISE, I HAVE NO REASON TO LISTEN TO YOU"

The burden of Proof Lies on the Atheist. Ayaw liboga.

We said that There is God, dili makita kay ang explanation naa sa Bibliya tanan. Ang Ginoo espiritu, ang espiritu di makita. Nya kami na nuon inyu pahatagun ug Scientific proof unsaon PAGKAKITA sa Ginoo nga espirito? Gihatagan namu tanan explanation nya wa mu mutoo nya kami na nuon muhatag ug Scientific proof?

hatagi mig ug Scientific proof nga inyu na gisuroy ang tibuok universe nya wa mu kita ug Langit or Ginoo - Pero di mu present ana kay inyung Science way kapasidad para mu hatag ana. So if inyu gibasihan kamoy unang mu angkon nga di pa ka explain tanan butang - PAGHILOM MU

[orcgod]

really a thousand times? tsk tsk looy pod, study more para maka sabot ka kung unsa ng burden of proof. here is a hint ay...di lang na para sa positive claim but also sa negative propositions. gets?

yes really, does it even take a THOUSAND times for you to get the LOGIC? BURDEN OF PROOF.

[nowpress*]

Oh, so I see, you dont UNDERSTAND what BURDEN of PROOF is all about.

ok, lets say, there's a Billionaire, and his daughter is kidnapped, but the Billionaire doesnt know who kidnapped his daughter, and the location of his daughter, and if his daughter is still alive.

2 hours later, phone rings, he answers the phone, Kidnapper demands 2 million dollars.

Father asks, is my daughter alive? kidnapper says YES. Father asks, CAN I HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROOF?

so Im the FATHER who's daughter is KIDNAPPED, and you are the KIDNAPPER who has my daughter.

So in laymans term sir, I am a person who doesnt have a GOD, you have a GOD, so wheres the PROOF of your GOD?

haha that's called proof for life not burden of proof.

wrong analogy. the father already knows that his daughter is real so no need to prove if tinood ba ni exsit iya daughter or wa. hahaha, try again. you failed.