All about NOYNOY AQUINO

[estor_boot]

---

you're talking about tourist who comprises only small percentage of island travellers. most pinoys travel not as tourist but to visit relatives or attend to small businesses. kung mag plane ta kadako kaha nato ug gasto. imagine kung naay airport ang bantayan island pero walay pier kung mangadto ta moplete tag mga 1,500 sa plane one way lang, while kung landtrip and boat ta mga more or less below 1k lang ato gasto roundtrip pa.

simang na man ning estoryaha. if you did read about the article about scrapping the roro projects and keep an open mind, klaro ato nga ang airport is to entice tourists and give them convenience nga moadto sa Panglao and not for Pinoys who visit their relatives. Panglao is envisioned to be bigger than Boracay, imagine the economic gains ana nga mapunta sa Bohol.and who says other means of transportation will be ban in Panglao once the airport is there? kung movisit ka sa imong relative sa Panglao pugson gyud diay kag pasakay sa eroplano?

[rickflag]

di man na simang. kung ang mawala ang roro projects ato ilisan ug airport because of pnoy's "bright" idea, pila ra man maka benefit ani? siguro 10% of our population ra compared to roro.

[vipvip68]

you're talking about tourist who comprises only small percentage of island travellers. most pinoys travel not as tourist but to visit relatives or attend to small businesses. kung mag plane ta kadako kaha nato ug gasto. imagine kung naay airport ang bantayan island pero walay pier kung mangadto ta moplete tag mga 1,500 sa plane one way lang, while kung landtrip and boat ta mga more or less below 1k lang ato gasto roundtrip pa.

tourists bring in the $$$ bro...

ang local nga travelers igo ra man na ga tuyok tuyok sa local nato nga money... we need foreign inflows to boost our economy...

With more tourists and more FDI's maka grow ni sa atong economy and increase the spending power sa atong mga tao.

[vipvip68]

di man na simang. kung ang mawala ang roro projects ato ilisan ug airport because of pnoy's "bright" idea, pila ra man maka benefit ani? siguro 10% of our population ra compared to roro.

dont be too short sighted bro.... if tourism atong storyahan, building airports, allows more industries to grow in panglao and bohol.

These airports will serve as the gateway for foreigners to bring in investments to these areas. These investments in hotels/resorts etc will require additional jobs and have a multiplier effect sa atong mga industries.

Kung roro imo istoryahan... unsa may net benefits and multiplier effects ani especially kung dili kaayo high traffic nga roro port?

take note that the roro port here is the nautical highway... dili ang local passenger vessels.

[KhunRudy]

you're talking about tourist who comprises only small percentage of island travellers. most pinoys travel not as tourist but to visit relatives or attend to small businesses. kung mag plane ta kadako kaha nato ug gasto. imagine kung naay airport ang bantayan island pero walay pier kung mangadto ta moplete tag mga 1,500 sa plane one way lang, while kung landtrip and boat ta mga more or less below 1k lang ato gasto roundtrip pa.

imo sab na. sa akoa kanang kanang mga pinoy kamao nana sila unsaon nga makadaginot sa byahe existing nana ila rota.
unsaon nimo pagdani sa turista gusto sad nimo sila ipareha dinha sa mga pinoy...hmmm
sa thailand napuno ang mga mall og turista mga theme park nila daghan turista gipamahalan lang nila ang bayad
compare sa local, nawa nanindot ila theme park kapahimolos man gyapon mga lokal. sa cambodia nindot sad mga hotel klaro mga
turista ang ga stay pero mga local nakatrabaho mansad og misulod ang kwarta sa ila lugar. ako ganahan unta ko ana
nga mga lugar pero dugay manta moabot nya daghan pajud mangongoot, isnatser bwahahaha pasakyon nato ug habal habal para di
sila kalimot pwede sad.

[hulagway]

kung balibaran ka sa DOTC that will prove their 'transparency' stuff is pure lip service. i'll stop supporting PNoy kung ing-ana. adto ngadto, pagdalag video cam ala imbestigador ba para naa gyud evidence kung balibaran ka sa details nga imong pangayoon. deal?

ahhh..no nee to bring in video cam.or anything just to porve that.it would be nice to see it for yourself? mas maayo diba kung ikaw nalang?

where in the article that says savings from scrapping the roro projects will be added to CCT? lukso na pud ta sa laing topic ani? pataas lang sa estorya? Panglao Airport. 'nuff said.

ahh..TOR it would be nice to used ur head sometimes..let me explain it for u..listen closely..

CCT program is a program for the poor, for education and for other things that they need daily..now if we removed the roro in a certain area it would mean that their are family na affected.(work and business related things diba? so now where do they get money to support their daily needs? so mo daghan napud ang walay trabaho mo result napud na sa poverty? of which mao nay reason nga naa CCT? diba? mao na ako reason nga naka ingon ko nga mo dako ang budget sa CCT kay mo daghan ma ang ma walan ng trabaho.

i hope i explain it well..

CCT doesn't fall within your isda blah blah blah. mao bitaw gitawag na ug CCT kay Conditional Cash Transfer. take note of the word in bold. besides, this CCT has been recognized by the UN as one program for poverty alleviation. i don't think UN has never heard about your isda blah blah cliche.

ok..you make it big for me to see..but you failed to mention what are the "CONDITIONS"? please do provide data..

it has been recognize by UN but does not necessarily mean nga successful na diri sa PINAS..it was for the other country not for the Philippines..tsk tsk tsk tsk...used ur head lage..

going back again to my "PANULTION" would it me nice to produce more jobs than increase the CCT budget? what you "THINK"? ng "SAVE" man kaha ang admin

[hulagway]

simang na man ning estoryaha. if you did read about the article about scrapping the roro projects and keep an open mind, klaro ato nga ang airport is to entice tourists and give them convenience nga moadto sa Panglao and not for Pinoys who visit their relatives. Panglao is envisioned to be bigger than Boracay, imagine the economic gains ana nga mapunta sa Bohol.and who says other means of transportation will be ban in Panglao once the airport is there? kung movisit ka sa imong relative sa Panglao pugson gyud diay kag pasakay sa eroplano?

again airport and roro port can co exist together they function differently..you sacrifices one thing to favor the other..you are more concern about the tourist what about the local industries? did they include that in their studies? tsk tsk tsk. paita uyyy..

[vipvip68]

again airport and roro port can co exist together they function differently..you sacrifices one thing to favor the other..you are more concern about the tourist what about the local industries? did they include that in their studies? tsk tsk tsk. paita uyyy..

dili man tangtangon tanan roro ports... kato lang mga unnecessary ones... you said nga roro and airport can coexist... mao btaw we keep the necessary roro ports and build the intl airports para maximize sa net benefits sa atong limited budget.


We don't really have the studies with us so its hard for us to judge gyud... but any study should take into account all the net effects to all concerned parties.

In determining that a roro port is needed or not, they factored in the net benefits it would give vs. allocating the money to other projects that can also give benefits.

It's all about making good use out of the limited budget available to have the biggest positive impact to our country.

[hulagway]

dili man tangtangon tanan roro ports... kato lang mga unnecessary ones... you said nga roro and airport can coexist... mao btaw we keep the necessary roro ports and build the intl airports para maximize sa net benefits sa atong limited budget.


We don't really have the studies with us so its hard for us to judge gyud... but any study should take into account all the net effects to all concerned parties.

In determining that a roro port is needed or not, they factored in the net benefits it would give vs. allocating the money to other projects that can also give benefits.

It's all about making good use out of the limited budget available to have the biggest positive impact to our country.

thats why i ask..asa ni nga mga roro ang tangtangon ug asa ang i retain para kita mismo maka hibaw kung sakto ba o dili ang ilang recommendation..diba? simple lang man unta kaayo na ako pangutana..dapat mohatag sila ug sakto nga details ba dili hanging sama karon..al we know is 66 ang tangtangon..asa mani dapit nga lugar? what are the reasons? why retain 6 only..con it cover the whole operations? who are the new contractors? etc .para ang mo sunod nga president or admin dili na kinahanglan ug investagation kay detalyodo naman..para mo moved on nata..

[KhunRudy]

again airport and roro port can co exist together they function differently..you sacrifices one thing to favor the other..you are more concern about the tourist what about the local industries? did they include that in their studies? tsk tsk tsk. paita uyyy..

unsay pagtoo nimo sa turista balas ang gibitbit? local industries...asa man diay paingon ng kwarta anang mga turista taas kaayog istorya way unod