Wikipedia ka tuho an bah 100% or dli

[JezzyCalm]

---

bitaw noh.. karon pa q kabantay.. hehehe..

[Lord_Ac]

Aswang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Throwing semen at aswang is also said to irritate them. Along with semen, phallic objects are supposed to make the aswang terrified.

Yup. Very Reliable.

[rodsky]

People still have failed to answer my question:

a) Do you want an information source that's only controlled by ONE entity (thereby if that ONE entity feels that "Muslims are all evil people" then he/they can inject their beliefs in the database, without consulting the rest of the world)?

b) Do you want an information source that's not controlled by one entity, but by ALL people, and although there lies the danger of false input, mediocre fact-gathering, and possible tampering, the fact that it's accessible by the public means that the REAL experts on a topic can always check if the information is indeed authentic and authoritative?

I guess based on the lack of answers, I assume that most people prefer a SINGLE source of info that they BELIEVE is reliable, and believe in it WITHOUT question, kay mahadlok man sila sa info source like Wikipedia (which actually encourages critical thinking because you get to wonder if the facts stated therein are really true or not) because of it's "open" nature.










It's kinda like church.

-RODION

[yiennahs]

People still have failed to answer my question:

a) Do you want an information source that's only controlled by ONE entity (thereby if that ONE entity feels that "Muslims are all evil people" then he/they can inject their beliefs in the database, without consulting the rest of the world)?

b) Do you want an information source that's not controlled by one entity, but by ALL people, and although there lies the danger of false input, mediocre fact-gathering, and possible tampering, the fact that it's accessible by the public means that the REAL experts on a topic can always check if the information is indeed authentic and authoritative?

I guess based on the lack of answers, I assume that most people prefer a SINGLE source of info that they BELIEVE is reliable, and believe in it WITHOUT question, kay mahadlok man sila sa info source like Wikipedia (which actually encourages critical thinking because you get to wonder if the facts stated therein are really true or not).










It's kinda like church.

-RODION

i want to know about Coco Martin
mga ingun ana na question ba
nagsearch ko sa wiki murag di man tinuud ang uban

[THE KID]

I beg to disagree...

https://www.istorya.net/forums/10664364-post54.html

Look up References.

-RODION

^^ i was about to edit my comment post no.58....kai i back read ur comments in post no.54...and i check it out sa wikipedia....yeah...i was wrong....

[akpacquiao]

there are some info man pud. mao lage dili lang jud mag rely aning wiki.

[rodsky]

i want to know about Coco Martin
mga ingun ana na question ba
nagsearch ko sa wiki murag di man tinuud ang uban

I checked that entry myself. AND also checked references...

References

Coco Martin will continue doing Indie Films
- Coco Marton wins his first TV acting award for Tayong Dalawa
- Coco Martin, Prince of Independent Films, is getting Star Magic buildup retrieved via -
- Coco Martin sacrificed chance to work with French actress Isabelle Huppert for Minsan Lang Kita Iibigin

So it's very simple--double-check if the words on the Wikipedia page MATCH the entries in the sources--if dili mag match then IT'S YOUR responsibility to edit the entry and change it so it should match. Pag exert pod ug gamay nga effort intawon ba. Kini man ang HINUNGDAN why Wikipedia is open--YOU are supposed to participate in maintaining it para ma-improve. Dili lang sigeg TAKE and TAKE ba...usahay pag GIVE pod.

Ang problema sa inyong mga young people nowadays, gusto nalang ninyo puro INSTANT results...instant coffee, instant credit, instant vacation...shakes head, pagtrabaho ug pag contribute pod mo gamay, because Wikipedia is a WORLD USER effort--in fact most of the wrong entries there are from disgruntled people who do NOT believe in the idea of Wikipedia mao nga gubaon nila ang mga entry para makasulti sila nga "Tan-awa, bati nga info source ang Wikipedia, kay sayop..." when in fact sila ra man diay nag introduce sa sayop.

Stop wanting "instant" stuff--use your brain and WORK for a change.

-RODION

[beowulf]

mao sad, instant na gyud gusto sa mga batan-on karon. ang maayo tingali himuon ninyo cross-reference na lang

[victor3]

Who the hell is Taloy Bungi? Central figure pa daw sa seal sa PNP

Lapu-Lapu - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok ra unta kung naay entries na ridiculously worded kay sayon ra pag dismiss as garbage. Pero kanang kang Taloy Bungi im sure maka mislead pod na sa taga laing nasod. but then again caveat emptor even if its free

[domzgnrlover86]

nay ubang detalye sa wiki sayup sad, dili tanan sakto hehehe