conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

Yes, they have all been debunked. I truly cannot understand why this thread is still even open.

-RODION

same script sir?
wala nay lain?
how about the question of communication?

they are using tv signal,
do you know how big a transmitter it required to transmit tv signal from the moon to earth?
bisan gani dia ta sa earth we need huge transmitter tower to reach just a few miles, unsa pa kaha nang earth to moon? across our atmosphere.

asa man ilang transmitter ato?
katong naa sa ilang backpack?
in a time when they still have no satellite.
this is one factor questioned by Gus Grissom.

When they could not even communicate clearly from the cockpit, how would they communicate from the moon?
he asked this moments before his ship exploded.
He said" how are we going to get to the moon if we cant talk between two or three buildings?.."

‪The Final Moments of Apollo One‬‏ - YouTube

[Fallen6]

@soul doctor
i totally disagree about them not winning.
there is no such thing as winning or losing on this kind of thread kay everything is pure opinion.
i have been reading the thread for quite sometime now and the only topic that i could really have a doubt is the 9/11 part since i also have my doubts on that event.

but with regards to the moon landing, facts were already given even scientific explanations/data
which is more reliable than youtube videos.
maka tawa lang ko kay you keep on insisting nga sakto ka sa imo mga gpang ingon about sa moon landing theory when all you have are only videos from youtube.
mura man nua ka ug batang gamay, if scientific data is not enough for you then imo nana, its better not to discuss this type of matter especially if misleading ang imo info.

ug naay taw nga wala naka sabay sa topic about the moon landing theory ikaw gyd na siya.
but sa 9/11 theory naay possibility nga tinuod imo gpang ingon kay bisag ako naay second thoughts even if mo ingon sila nga debunked nato.

and honestly lang noh?
its really annoying to hear you keep saying watch videos on youtube, youtube, youtube and more youtube.
you mentioned your a chemical engr.

engr naman kaha ka then you should know that youtubes are hell not enough to prove something.
get more reliable facts by reading more not watching more.
walay maayong laki nga nag cge ra ug tan-aw ug mga videos.

most of them kay nangita ug reliable facts like formula's or even tried replicating something through simulation.
all you did is present videos from somewhere nga never in a debate or research paper would be accepted.

RODION was able to answer all the question being thrown in this thread and even dared everybody in doubt to go with him and have a simulation of the said theory. (this is how things should be done, replication through simulation of the said event, even the greatest scientist are using this method in getting answers)

[g0dmenuelz]

Mga Leemings ra og sheeps ang mo ingon na debunked ang 9/11.

[Soul Doctor]

@soul doctor
i totally disagree about them not winning.
there is no such thing as winning or losing on this kind of thread kay everything is pure opinion.
i have been reading the thread for quite sometime now and the only topic that i could really have a doubt is the 9/11 part since i also have my doubts on that event.

but with regards to the moon landing, facts were already given even scientific explanations/data
which is more reliable than youtube videos.
maka tawa lang ko kay you keep on insisting nga sakto ka sa imo mga gpang ingon about sa moon landing theory when all you have are only videos from youtube.
mura man nua ka ug batang gamay, if scientific data is not enough for you then imo nana, its better not to discuss this type of matter especially if misleading ang imo info.

ug naay taw nga wala naka sabay sa topic about the moon landing theory ikaw gyd na siya.
but sa 9/11 theory naay possibility nga tinuod imo gpang ingon kay bisag ako naay second thoughts even if mo ingon sila nga debunked nato.

bro i said they have not won an argument.
im not saying that im winning. in fact this thread was started to draw discussions about these 3 conspiracy theories which i consider as truth presented as a conspiracy theory to cover it up.

anyway, if thats how you see it,
thats your opinion bro. and i respect that.

all they did was bully their way into any argument and they ganged up on me on personal issues.

And so far .. moon landing buffs never answered my questions.

1.) is the oxygen supply enough to last them 7 days in space?

2.) are the cameras and their sensitive films not affected by radiaton and extreme temperature in the moon and in space?

3.) how did they go to the bathroom? the urinating part is easy..its the other thing that scares me.

4.) how did they get pass the Van Allen radiation belt and survive without physical damage?

5.) how did their ship and electronic instruments survive across thousands of miles of radiation which could have fried all their electronic equipment?

6.) how did they survive 3 days of at least continuous travel at 5 g's or 5 times the speed of sound.
a feat which is impossible to even imagine.

7.) how could that lunar take off give a boost similar to its earths take off when the moon has its own gravity. how could they travel back at the same speed using so little take off power?

8.) how could they survive the extreme temperatures in the moon? with only a jampacked lunar module and a thin space suit? how did they provide air conditioning and where did they get so much power for that "heating and airconditioning"?

i got more questions coming bro...
until now im still thinking of questions to ask here. but so far i have not gotten any sensible answer except from those copy pasted from links. which does not even answer my question directly.

[Soul Doctor]

i happened to stumbled with this -link-

but some details of this conspiracy are rather intriguing..

same question i had in mind.

go to the comments.

read on how they argued on the communication capabilities of the lunar module or the astronauts transmission from the moon.

[Fallen6]

now you are talking more like you are seeking for answers.

if you started the thread like that then people could have respected you.

your questions are sensible man and your arguments are worth to be answered, just keep your attitude down and in a humble way, lets wait for rodion to answer all the questions you have given kay murag siya ra jud ang naay dako nga knowledge ani.

and whatever answer he may give then accept it as long as he can provide a strong scientific answer.

its a matter of having an open mind and a humble attitude. i have nothing against you nor them because i find the thread interesting man sad. heads up but feet on the ground lang bro

[Soul Doctor]

now you are talking more like you are seeking for answers.

if you started the thread like that then people could have respected you.

your questions are sensible man and your arguments are worth to be answered, just keep your attitude down and in a humble way, lets wait for rodion to answer all the questions you have given kay murag siya ra jud ang naay dako nga knowledge ani.

and whatever answer he may give then accept it as long as he can provide a strong scientific answer.

its a matter of having an open mind and a humble attitude. i have nothing against you nor them because i find the thread interesting man sad. heads up but feet on the ground lang bro

sorry, i cant be humble. im not that great.
i used to be humble,
but in the real world if you are not able to shine,
they underestimate you and think you are dumb.

when i live in Cagayan de Oro, people ask why I have not taken the Civil Service exams.
I was a graduate then of Chemical engineering.
I was a very humble and a very quite person.
Then they suggest i take the exam with my wife and let my wife answer those questions for me.
It was kind of insulting, why would they think im that slow?
It was because i dont talk much then.

So I took the exams with in a month, without any review.
When I passed it, they look amazed.
they even wanted me to buy a lechon to celebrate.
(people seldom pass the civil exams there)
I said theres nothing to it. its just like NCEE.
Later I took the board exams and passed, thats when they started to respect me.

Its good to be humble, but you could also be an easy target to people like Pinoy_09, xavimao, springfield and rodsky.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

psychological test gani.
wala ka kasabot?

of course they would not ask him to swear to a bible if he is an atheist, whats the use?

but we all know that they are christians that is why they can be tested with the swear to a bible test.

but after this, niel armstrong considered changing his religion to muslim. why?
first, he would not agree to be interviewed.
then he would not swear to a bible.
then he change his religion to muslim.
Why oh why?

Psychological testing ? Well matod niom but still its not . Why ? Because even the very people who protects the bible has the capabilities of not affected of the supposed to be psychological testing it brings .

That is why pls dont use the bible to gage on something to extract its TRUTHFULLNESS . You might have gotten your idea when you usually see people in court hearings swear to the bible but it doesnt garantee anything .

Dok ... baga-a pod ug dagway niom mo sulti we are not winning lol . Naa diay contest nahitabo ?

Indeed you cant be humble in this world when MANGHAMBOG ka sa mga ACHIEVEMENTS nimo when in fact it has nothing to do or any relevance sa topic nato . HAMBUGERA ra ka dok . The very reasons why we asked for your achievements is that , for you to established your CREDIBILITY here since you keep on claiming something . nakasaklap , dili pa gyud diay na imohang ideas but from the very people you idolized , its obvious that you are a FANATIC unya sa first page nimo , pa HATE HATE pa ka . If you are into CONSPIRACY THEORIES , you are always into CONSPIRACY THEORIES maski kapila na siya gi debunk na .

[pinoy_09]

Wow Soul Doctor must be very intelligent. I have not heard of anyone passing a board (or bar) exam without any reviews until now. Bow na gyud ko aning Soul Doctor. Hurot akong bilib nimo doc.

[rodsky]

I have not heard of anyone passing a board (or bar) exam without any reviews until now.

It all depends on the exam. I would be insane to take the Bar without taking a review first. But I took the civil service eligibility exam and got 90% without undergoing review classes.

Also, remember this guy?

Catch Me If You Can - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frank Abagnale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He may well be a crook, but he did pass THE AMERICAN BAR EXAM without having to do ANY formal law schooling and any review.

So in that aspect I'd have to agree with soul_doctor, in that not all people have to go through reviews in order to pass an exam. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen.

-RODION