conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

i believe na answeran ni ang Apollo Landing sa usa ka episode sa Discovery Channel's "Mythbusters"... try to look at it and give your ideas about it...

they specialize in special effects.
I saw how they recreate the sun and its shadows. but the sun is too far a light compared to a lamp in a studio set. with the distance of the sun from the moon, you can not compare that to a lamp placed indoor at a studio. the lamp can be manipulated by moving far and close an object. but the sun is practically fixed considering the distance between the moon and the sun.
I can manipulate the light myself. but angles don't lie.
We measure distant objects using angles and with very high precision.
How do you think we measured the distance between earth and the moon?

So if the angles were wrong.it only means something was really wrong.
And the angles of the shadows was not right.
but these guys can think of everything for excuse.
Their special effects can fool any average movie goer.
But they cant fool me.

[pinoy_09]

Why insist on something that has been repeatedly answered? If you have questions that needs to be answered, why ask us? Can't you google the answers yourself? Or are you just TOO LAZY to do it?

They're all around the internet, you know.

[Soul Doctor]

Why insist on something that has been repeatedly answered? If you have questions that needs to be answered, why ask us? Can't you google the answers yourself? Or are you just TOO LAZY to do it?

They're all around the internet, you know.

Is that your best argument?

Lame.

My questions could easily be answered by a thinking elementary student.

Mao nay problema ninyo. Dili na mo mohunahuna. Kay lagi naa sa google.
So kung unsay naa didto, mao na toy imong hunahuna sad.
Kaon lang mo kung unsay ihungit ninyo.
bisan bukog sa isda, tulon lang gihapon.

Now I understand why you can not argue point by point.

[pinoy_09]

Is that your best argument?

Lame.

My questions could easily be answered by a thinking elementary student.

Mao nay problema ninyo. Dili na mo mohunahuna. Kay lagi naa sa google.
So kung unsay naa didto, mao na toy imong hunahuna sad.
Kaon lang mo kung unsay ihungit ninyo.
bisan bukog sa isda, tulon lang gihapon.

Now I understand why you can not argue point by point.

The reason you want us engaged in this redundant discussion is because you want to prove you are the better man. You even said to "like your post for support" lol and where are the likes? Don't embarrass yourself further.

By saying that an elementary student can answer your questions, you are admitting that an elementary student is a better thinker than you.

FAIL.

[Soul Doctor]

The reason you want us engaged in this redundant discussion is because you want to prove you are the better man. You even said to "like your post for support" lol and where are the likes? Don't embarrass yourself further.

By saying that an elementary student can answer your questions, you are admitting that an elementary student is a better thinker than you.

FAIL.

where do you get your logic?

[pinoy_09]

where do you get your logic?

Doesn't matter where I get it from. What matters is that I am correct.

[Soul Doctor]

Doesn't matter where I get it from. What matters is that I am correct.

Correct with your logic?
Which part of your logic is correct?

[pinoy_09]

Correct with your logic?
Which part of your logic is correct?

Comprehension skills. One thing that most conspiracy nuts lack.

[treize]

because there were no other cameras carried in the lunar module.
The cameras they carried are supposed to be designed for that special mission.
And they were attached to the astronauts body.
But see how perfect the framings were.
How could they do that if they don't have a viewfinder.

And how did the film survive such environment in perfect condition?
The moons temperature are on the extremes.
At night or when the sun is on the other side, the temp drops to -173 celcius
imagine 0 degrees as the freezing point of water. -173 is way below that.
meaning the film could have frozen along with its chemicals.
think of what will happen to the pictures of the camera?

On a day environment where the sun is up, the temperature reaches above 100 degrees centigrade or boiling point of water. If youve seen the camera, do you think that camera can survive extreme coldness of negative 173 degrees celcius and the heat of a boiling water?
What happens to the negatives of the camera?
But the radiation on the moon also affects the unprocessed films.
Mao gani careful ta nga dili maabli ang camera while naa pa ang film para dili maexpose sa radiation.
But in the moon. radiation is everywhere.
Kung walay lead insulations ang cameras dili unta sila kadevelop og ingon ato ka clear nga pictures.

Mao nay nakabati nimo doc.. I watched the video links you posted but you never even bothered to click the links that I presented. If only you've licked it, watch it and read it, you wouldn't be asking this questions. There are things that I agree with you admired your intellectual capacity to understand things that circumstances were difficult, but this one... tsk! tsk! tsk! damn you really² disappoint me big time. My advice is just read, read, read and watch what was presented to you so that you can realize what's the best answer to the questions that you've posted.

Imong mga pangutana doc gitubag na peru ikaw nagginahi lang gihapon kay wala tingali ka kasabot sa tubag or wala ka kasabot sa question.

I can't even believe that one of your questions was "Who took the shot of Man's first step to the moon.." I really thought you are somebody who is capable of intellectual analysis and resolutions but you really failed this time. So nakaingon nalang gyud ko nga nagpasagad nalang kag tuo bisag dili mao.

Nakainom pa ko ani doc ha.. samot nag wala.. side step nasad na imong tubag..

[treize]

physicist nagstudy bro.
lugar, ang physicist dili kahibaw unsay naglight ato, kung naa pa?

Im sure convinced mo sa inyong self about everything in the moon landing as true.
and no amount of evidence can convince you otherwise.

no problem with that.
I know what i know.

Yea Physicist bro unya ang iyahang gi present is pure assumption sa shadows og light reflections, but can't provide any solid proof. Iyang assumptions gi debunk na peru ikaw sige lang gihapon. Mas maayo gyud diay ka ani nga field sa photography?