conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

Nobody is telling you what to do. It just seems ironic that you discredit the facts and rely heavily on your own thinking when you have presented nothing on your resume to back up your claims.

Again, may I know what your occupation is?

Haha. Thats your bait?
So when I give you my job you and xavimao will attack and mock me?
Sorry sis, Im jobless.
mock that.

[Soul Doctor]

In wikipedia:
(copy pasted for the convenience of the readers)
Virgil Ivan Grissom (April 3, 1926 – January 27, 1967), better known as Gus Grissom, was one of the original NASA Project Mercury astronauts and a United States Air Force pilot. He was the second American to fly in space and the first NASA astronaut to fly in space twice.

Grissom was KILLED along with fellow astronauts Ed White and Roger Chaffee during a pre-launch test for the Apollo 1 mission at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (then known as Cape Kennedy), Florida. He was the first of the Mercury Seven to die. He was also a recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross and, posthumously, the Congressional Space Medal of Honor.

(I capitalized it to stress the word killed)why did they use that word?
why not use the word died?

The reason why Grissom is critical because he was a Mason.
And his values as a Mason, he can not be bought.
He would not agree to fool the public.
He was also a friend and favorite astronaut of JFK.

And after JFK assaination, Grissom was suspicious of the program.
He called the lunar module--- "A bucket full of nuts and bolts"
And why would he say that?----if he was going to be the first man to the moon.

[Soul Doctor]

Just here to present little odd things about the moon landing hoax.
(Again copy pasted for the convenience of the readers and for the inconvenience of my detractors)
9 SPACE ODDITIES:

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?

3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired

[Soul Doctor]

Why would they fake it?

Motives

Several motives have been suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landings - some of the recurrent elements are:

Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly stop, with planned missions cancelled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.

Cold War Prestige - The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible, would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.

Money - NASA raised approximately 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. This could have been used to pay off a large number of people, providing significant motivation for complicity. In variations of this theory, the space industry is characterized as a political economy, much like the military industrial complex, creating fertile ground for its own survival.

Risk - The available technology at the time was such that there was a good chance that the landing might fail if genuinely attempted.

The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up, the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).

[genjoy]

nice bro....

[Soul Doctor]

nice bro....

Thanks!
And thanks for the like. much appreciated bro.
Please madlang people, Like my post for support.

[Soul Doctor]

From a documentary show
Dr. David Groves alleged that the lunar photos were staged.
Dr. Groves is a physicist and computer image analyst.
he can prove that there was an additional lighting in those photos.
He studied it and knew exactly where the light was placed based on the light reflected on the boots.
But NASA told TV that there was no additional studio light carried on board.
YouTube - ‪Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis‬‏

I want pinoy_09, xavimao, springfield and rodsky to discuss on this (intelligently) if they can.

[JcBoY]

I'll be glad if somebody answer my simple curiousity

Ingon nila walay hangin sa moon, akong pangutana nganong nag-lupad2 lagi ning flag nga ila giugbok kuno sa moon?

[xavisimao]

From a documentary show
Dr. David Groves alleged that the lunar photos were staged.
Dr. Groves is a physicist and computer image analyst.
he can prove that there was an additional lighting in those photos.
He studied it and knew exactly where the light was placed based on the light reflected on the boots.
But NASA told TV that there was no additional studio light carried on board.
YouTube - ‪Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysis‬‏

simple explanation:

Shadows on the Moon are complicated by reflected light, uneven ground, wide-angle lens distortion, and lunar dust. There are several light sources: the Sun, sunlight reflected from the Earth, sunlight reflected from the Moon's surface, and sunlight reflected from the astronauts and the Lunar Module. Light from these sources is scattered by lunar dust in many different directions, including into shadows. Shadows falling into craters and hills may appear longer, shorter and distorted.Furthermore, shadows display the properties of vanishing point perspective, leading them to converge to a point on the horizon.


you can't appreciate this explanation if you don't have basic background of photography reflective lighting...

[Sand Man]

http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/...k1-295x300.jpg

I'll be glad if somebody answer my simple curiousity

Ingon nila walay hangin sa moon, akong pangutana nganong nag-lupad2 lagi ning flag nga ila giugbok kuno sa moon?

Naa na siya frame sa ibabaw mao na gabukad...