conspiracy theories

[THE SKULLS]

---

looks like anybody with artistry can do this. with adobe photoshop, it's way more simplier.
how old is this pic?

[THE SKULLS]

The "wrong guys" are those that have claims without authority and without peer-evaluation from similar scientific entities around the world.

A good analogy is this:

Would you rob a bank? If you're not desperate or crazy, naturally your response would be, "Of course not!"

Why? "Because it is against the law!"

Who said it's against the law? "The people in government or the authorities!"

Then, stopping at this point, what you just said (i.e. "Who are the wrong guys, with the wrong links?") implies that the links that people like me share in this thread are "possibly false" or "not authoritative". But that's just like saying that "Cebu City Police are NOT authoritative!" or "The Philippine Army is NOT an authority!" so then, THE_SKULLS, perhaps you should rob a bank, because you can always argue that the local police and army cannot possibly arrest you because "these guys could be wrong--they could NOT be authoritative"...kay kinsa man nag declare sa ila bi nga dapat "authorized" sila manakop nimo if you robbed a bank? Naturally, a MAJORITY of citizens have declared that they are in fact, the authorities, even if a handful of crazy crooks believe that they are not in authority.

Same thing with your allegations that our links are NOT "authoritative" or "cannot be trusted" (when in fact, the links we share are indeed sources of authority that has been peer-evaluated by a MAJORITY of various scientific communities around the world)...you're just like expressing a mistrust for the police or the army.

So again, you might as well rob a bank, if you really believe in what you're saying.

-RODION

and faking is not against the law, mao na imo pasabot Rodsky? would llike to elaborate more about your absolute science?

[THE SKULLS]

The "wrong guys" are those that have claims without authority and without peer-evaluation from similar scientific entities around the world.

A good analogy is this:

Would you rob a bank? If you're not desperate or crazy, naturally your response would be, "Of course not!"

Why? "Because it is against the law!"

Who said it's against the law? "The people in government or the authorities!"

Then, stopping at this point, what you just said (i.e. "Who are the wrong guys, with the wrong links?") implies that the links that people like me share in this thread are "possibly false" or "not authoritative". But that's just like saying that "Cebu City Police are NOT authoritative!" or "The Philippine Army is NOT an authority!" so then, THE_SKULLS, perhaps you should rob a bank, because you can always argue that the local police and army cannot possibly arrest you because "these guys could be wrong--they could NOT be authoritative"...kay kinsa man nag declare sa ila bi nga dapat "authorized" sila manakop nimo if you robbed a bank? Naturally, a MAJORITY of citizens have declared that they are in fact, the authorities, even if a handful of crazy crooks believe that they are not in authority.

Same thing with your allegations that our links are NOT "authoritative" or "cannot be trusted" (when in fact, the links we share are indeed sources of authority that has been peer-evaluated by a MAJORITY of various scientific communities around the world)...you're just like expressing a mistrust for the police or the army.

So again, you might as well rob a bank, if you really believe in what you're saying.

-RODION

wrong analogy, pagka-oplok na lang jud ani na rason. gamita sad ng art nimo Rodsky.

why would I rob a bank? I completely knew and believed without science that robbing is unlawful. how come you're using this as your example? mao lang ba jud ni ma-abot anang imong utok? pagkatoytoy.

sorry sa words rodsky, but it really fit sa imong mga act diri.

This are theories, pasabot, naay basehan. Kung sa korte pa, mao-mao ra tingali ni sa ilang ginganalan ug "probable cause" then "the benefit of the doubt" ug "Beyond reasonable doubt."

Basin ma -ban na ko diri. Goodbye everyone.

[THE SKULLS]

im posting back my offer...

one night of healthy debate on conspiracy theories. Im offering 1 case of beer.

i would like to invite soul doctor, the skulls, rodsky, and all the others who would want to join the discussion.
minaw lang ko ha...

I would like to come Sir. If the other parties are interested, let me know the fix date for this event. I would like to discuss with them also.

Good day everyone

[THE SKULLS]

nindot ni nga idea imo bro.

mas nindot kung naay videocam bro. mura bag naa sa newsroom or talkshow ang setting.
para naay sense ang estorya kay conscious man tanan sa ilang gisulti.
unya inig kahuman ipost dayon sa youtube.
mag-invite sad tag outsiders para audience ug part sad sila nga mohatag og questions.
game ko ani.

unsa may topic kaha?
kapuyan na ko aning moon-landing oi.

mura man gud ni ug naghatag ta'g example sa mga bata about letter "A"
A as in Apple, why not use Avocado, Agta, Alibangbang, Alimango

pero, interesado ghapon ko. dili na lang ko mo-istorya, maminaw lang ko ninyo ni rodsky.

magdala diay ko ug laptop ug controller joystick, ato ipa-demo ni rodsky ang iyang nakat-onan na flight simulation.

olrayts!!!

[THE SKULLS]

looks familiar, a file of chocolate powder mix with marsmallows and clays in a table top.

[Soul Doctor]

Im sure prior to his space mission he got paid handsomely,(probability of dying is high and he might cant come back safely.) im sure the government also compensated him even more with his contributions.

he became a prof of aerospace engineering in a university after he resigned. he was not hiding and im sure the students and other profs had interviewed him about his mission.

I think NASA has already given the public the things the public need to know.(duh its NASA they always filter things to say.) Neil will ever say to all his interviews "I landed on the moon" but people, including you and the likes of you, will still say "he's lying. i dont believe it." people will still think it's a conspiracy.

I agree with xavisimao. He was just a pilot. There are other powerful, more intelligent personnels of Nasa who is way more qualified than him to be their director.
It's like manny pacquiao winning everything and have contributed so much to our nation. yet do you want him to be a director of a department?

He's just a pilot?
An astronaut is just a pilot?
my brother is a pilot, you are saying he can be an astronaut?

That's just like saying you can drive a car then you can drive a forklift too.

besides they came from a rooster of astronauts.
they were the best of the best.
so stop underestimating them as just pilots.

but neil was not the best.
there was gus grissom
he was supposed to be the first man to the moon.
but he considered the lunar module as "A BUCKET FULL OF BOLTS AND NUTS" this comment caused him his early demise.

[Soul Doctor]

looks like anybody with artistry can do this. with adobe photoshop, it's way more simplier.
how old is this pic?

again you underestimate the photographers and developers during their time.

the tricks they can do before and their special effects are already that good.

1969. during this time my father was the president of Cebu United Photographers Association.
I can not do what he can do will his pictures before.
He was really good compared to any of us who can use today's digital tools.
We have photoshop, they do not--- but that doesn't mean they can not "retouch" a picture like this.

Its like saying they can not calculate better before because they do not have battery operated calculators.
When in fact, they have better math skills than today's students. imagine solving math problems using a slide rule and without a pocket calculator.

Somehow your arguments is based on underestimations of people's ability to manage Nasa and to retouch photos..
Any more arguments based on other than the questions i raised?

[rodsky]

You both are talking about images that were taken just last week.

Your inability to check for image urls, their source, and the information surrounding the source never fails to amaze me.

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

looks familiar, a file of chocolate powder mix with marsmallows and clays in a table top.

how do you think george lucas creates convincing scene of other planets and moons?
Everything can be duplicated.
Even your mythbusters can reproduce a picture like this.