***truth about jesus christ!

[MavsMan]

---

Who created God? My answer is that I don't know. Maybe I'll find out when I die or never Find out the answer at all. It doesn't matter to me because I believe in God (The Creator, the Grand Architect, the Designer).

I'm not igniting a never ending question. I'm just saying the Universe didn't just appear out of Magic. There must be a Divine Being who created it.

Science can never prove what or who Created the Universe.

Peace!

This! ....

[butong101]

yes true but that's the function of the government. that's the reason why we have laws. we just have too much reservations about morality. that's why some people are abusing. that's why there are slaves, because they thought as this saying goes: ang nagpa ubos dinhi sa yuta, ipa ibabaw didto sa langit. the true wisdom of atheism is that "we are all equal". atheism promotes equality.

this logic errs to its maximum level...

[butong101]

yes true but that's the function of the government. that's the reason why we have laws. we just have too much reservations about morality. that's why some people are abusing. that's why there are slaves, because they thought as this saying goes: ang nagpa ubos dinhi sa yuta, ipa ibabaw didto sa langit. the true wisdom of atheism is that "we are all equal". atheism promotes equality.

reminds me of communism, isn't it?
this is more of communism than atheism..

is Karl Marx an atheist? many believes he is.. so what does his devote fanatic achieved? more of chaos than order,

isn't it because of their rigid thinking? even how brilliant they are

[SioDenz]

ang sakto ang nagbuhat ug insakto. kung para nimo sakto to imo gibuhat then sakto to. kung para sa uban dili to insakto then let them be as long as wa ka gihilabtan or wa ka pasakiti. mo bawos man sad ka ug pasakitan ka, so syempre mag duha2x ang tawo ug buhat ug dautan.

dautan means, nakapasakit ka, nanglupig ka, namintaha ka, etc, etc.

what's wrong of being like this?

So you admit nga ang morality sa Atheist based lagi sa individual way of thinking Not collectively - you used the phrase "Para Nimu". Ang Problema ani run kay since para nimu ug para sad Niya - walay general rule nga basihan so IF para niya sakto siya - sa concept of Atheism dili ka maka Condemn niya kay UNFAIR man kay para niya sakto man siya based sa iyang understanding.

Kana imung meaning sa dautan IMUHA sad nah ug it will Not Hold true sa lain nga Atheist ang basihan kay naa sad to silay lain definition or criteria. Dili na nimu pwedi ipamugos nga criteria kay dili ikaw ang gibasihan sa morality sa tanan Atheist.

Ang problema ana is di ka pwedi maka Condemn sa lain Atheist nga mubuhat ug butang nga wa nimu maangayi kay walay universal/absolute guideline ang concept sa Atheism.

[SioDenz]

Who created God? My answer is that I don't know. Maybe I'll find out when I die or never Find out the answer at all. It doesn't matter to me because I believe in God (The Creator, the Grand Architect, the Designer).

I'm not igniting a never ending question. I'm just saying the Universe didn't just appear out of Magic. There must be a Divine Being who created it.

Science can never prove what or who Created the Universe.

Peace!

Science is created to Verify and explain Gods creation through Experiments and providing Scientific Evidence para sa mga Atheist nga way laing rason kundi mangita ug Phyisical Evidence.

[bearish]

this logic errs to its maximum level...

could you explain why? or do you know logic at all?

[bearish]

reminds me of communism, isn't it?
this is more of communism than atheism..

is Karl Marx an atheist? many believes he is.. so what does his devote fanatic achieved? more of chaos than order,

isn't it because of their rigid thinking? even how brilliant they are

how come naabot naman ka sa communism? is communism a sort of religion or belief or a cult? I think your logic failed big time.

[bearish]

So you admit nga ang morality sa Atheist based lagi sa individual way of thinking Not collectively - you used the phrase "Para Nimu". Ang Problema ani run kay since para nimu ug para sad Niya - walay general rule nga basihan so IF para niya sakto siya - sa concept of Atheism dili ka maka Condemn niya kay UNFAIR man kay para niya sakto man siya based sa iyang understanding.

Kana imung meaning sa dautan IMUHA sad nah ug it will Not Hold true sa lain nga Atheist ang basihan kay naa sad to silay lain definition or criteria. Dili na nimu pwedi ipamugos nga criteria kay dili ikaw ang gibasihan sa morality sa tanan Atheist.

Ang problema ana is di ka pwedi maka Condemn sa lain Atheist nga mubuhat ug butang nga wa nimu maangayi kay walay universal/absolute guideline ang concept sa Atheism.

can you give an example?

[bearish]

Science is created to Verify and explain Gods creation through Experiments and providing Scientific Evidence para sa mga Atheist nga way laing rason kundi mangita ug Phyisical Evidence.

I am a bit skeptical about science being created. science is a study. to say "gods creation" is a bold statement that carries no supporting evidence. you should support your statement.

[SioDenz]

yes true but that's the function of the government. that's the reason why we have laws. we just have too much reservations about morality. that's why some people are abusing. that's why there are slaves, because they thought as this saying goes: ang nagpa ubos dinhi sa yuta, ipa ibabaw didto sa langit. the true wisdom of atheism is that "we are all equal". atheism promotes equality.

And also promotes individuality, that since I have my own Morality then I don't have to follow what others think, I don't have to follow others Law - And Nobody can Judge me or condemn me because what I did is the Right thing to do based on my own understanding.

Imagine if ing ani ang motto sa tagsa tagsa ka tawo sa kalibutan.