MERGED: Gay Marriage in the Philippines

[jomzkie23]

---

bromance.. hehe

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Hehehehe... Straight pud ko fafi uy. Kalain nimo uy. Kusi-on taka karon.

Although yes, I fit the description of the other two. I'm a secular non-Christian and yes, I am not against gay marriage. I'm sure there are conservative Catholics/Christians who share with my stance but they would be a MINORITY.

Bitaw seriously ... sa una ra ang luod hahahaha !! ON my behalf , I will support them and will respect them . But the moment magpakasal sila , murag dakong kalapasan na man gud na . Same sa analogy na RAPE bitaw . Its a very heinous crime but if ang victim gani is a child or a minor ... if naa pa laing word na mas grabe pa sa heinous crime , mao na siya .

Just because the RC teaches that homosexuality is not normal doesn't mean they are correct. And just because BILLIONS of people share the same sentiment doesn't make them all CORRECT. Billions of people thinking the same thing can't be wrong? That analogy in itself is WRONG. I won't even mention RELIGION here because that would be OT.

The very people who teaches this are not people na ga pataka lang . Dili mga people na ga buot2 , dili mga people na kung asa lang kuhaa ang mga ideas nila . Syaro sa 1 BILLION and ONE kabuok , naay 1 lang kabuok maka sulti na " SAYOP MAN KA DRE , DILI MAN NA DAKONG KALAPASAN ANG PAGKABAYOT " . Naa ba ? Because if naa then ang kanang is aka tao BRIGHT gyud na siya kay gi prove niya wrong ang 1 billion kabuok .

So we're talking PHILIPPINES here, am I correct? Granting nga legal ang gay marriage sa Pinas, and these gays magpakasal lang sa HUWES ug dili sa simbahan, ok raka ana?

Honestly ? Ok ra ko and walay paki nila . Kay the moment nagpakasal ka sa HUWES , its a total different story man compared sa what is a SACRAMENT of the MATRIMONY . There is no SACREDNESS sa mga tao magpakasal sa HUWES . Its only for the paper works purposes lang in black and white .

@FAQ ....

I have no time trying to figure out whether they existed just to have more SEXUAL FREEDOM like you're trying to assume . So the LBGT community existed so they could maneuver some "loophole and technicalities" ? Of what exactly ? Isn't that what other Christians dominations did because they want to create their own interpretations ?!?!

I never assumed anything. Like I said , why dont you check them out , spend sometime with them lol so you wont keep on speculating that I am assuming .

If you can define RELIGION and CULT then differentiate each other then it would answer question .

I won't believe of this claim until you show us proofs . How's my "analogy" became wrong when it is a PROVEN FACT that animals are practicing homosexual behaviors and it's something they didn't choose . They also co-exist together and have a fair share in bonding , and parenting . Go figure ...

First , why are you comparing human beings to animals ? They are not rational in the first place and they dont know what they are doing . Indeed they are practicing all kinds of taboos and s3xual activities that are not acceptable but these very animals you are talking about doesnt know if they are commiting INCEST , HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES etc .

Show you proofs ? Where ? Here in the forums ? Most likely it wont happen .

Since when nahitabo ?? Ming Dynasty , probably around 1368-1644 AD . Currently , it's legal in 10 countries . Your analogy about the BOLT and the NUT reffering to P3N!S and VAGINA . It's a messed up analogy , if I may say . A couple is a two individuals shares common beliefs , bonding , love , honesty , and devotion towards each other . I'm hope at your age you already know it doesn't have to be a male-female relationship .

Since when it happened again ? MING DYNASTY ? Did the Chinese say that a COUPLE also is composed of a MAN and a MAN ? Or a WOMAN and a WOMAN ? Just because GAY MARRIAGE or SAME *** MARRIAGE is legal to some countries , it doesnt change the fact that a COUPLE is about a MAN and a WOMAN and wether you like it or not , it stays like that . Thats how the ANALOGY took place because it is meant to be like that .

Dont entice me with your definition . Although it is correct , your reflection about " shares common beliefs , bonding , love , honesty , and devotion towards each other " will never materialized . A REAL COUPLE dili man gani mo lahutay usahay , much more pa kaha sa dili meant ?

Yes I agree to that . 100% , I read it . But what's your stand about lying to your parents , swearing the Lord's name in vain , cutting your hair - beard - sideburns , wearing cloth made of more than one fabric , working on the Sabbath , born with physical disabilities , hypocrisy , having s3x with multiple women , fantasizing of having s3x with someone , being raped in the city , wraths , and a lot more -- talking about PROHIBITION , MORALS , and VALUES here .. Hmmm ...

You are talking about MANS IMPERFECTNESS . That is not RELIGION . And there are still BILLIONS of people who still talk about PROHIBITION , MORALS and VALUES and practices what it preaches .

[3nZ0y]

First , why are you comparing human beings to animals ? They are not rational in the first place and they dont know what they are doing . Indeed they are practicing all kinds of taboos and s3xual activities that are not acceptable but these very animals you are talking about doesnt know if they are commiting INCEST , HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES etc .

I guess that is EXACTLY her point. She was trying to say that those irrational creatures who could not think for themselves do homosexual acts because it is not something that one can deliberately choose to with his better judgement.

This might seem OT and somewhat corny but it is a general knowledge that while we find reasons for being attracted to a person, we fall in love for no exact reason. In the same manner, homosexuals fall in love with no special reason; too bad they fall in love with their same s*x.

[amingb]

way lain buhaton aning mga Bading mag minyo mag Bersatin ... pahulay mo oi ... sakto jud to ingon sa Bible nga bitayon mo ...

[igcometa]

Somewhat Liberal akong views ani nga topic... in my opinion pede sila tagaan nlng ug "right to a partnership through legal ways" as long as dili sya sa simbahan.

[Chinen]

Gay and proud here but I'm against it. Lol. =/

I'm pretty gay (no pun intended) with all the respect I'm getting from the people around The fact that they respect my decision to love a ekal is such a relief. XD That's all I need. That marriage thing is irrevocable and is too deep a thing. XD

[jumper_stage]

dat man in the center is a PRO to gay marriage - who is he? N_Y_O_

[drop]

Gay marriage? sounds like blasphemy to me...

[FAQ]

I never assumed anything. Like I said , why dont you check them out , spend sometime with them lol so you wont keep on speculating that I am assuming .

If you can define RELIGION and CULT then differentiate each other then it would answer question .

You said ...

The CULT was established so they can manipulate loopholes and technicalities . From their own very website , they confirmed that the UNION was meant for the SEXUAL ACTIVITIES .

Now you're saying you NEVER assumed anything ? Your only defense for your claim is their supposedly confirmation from "their website" . You should look up the word CULT because it seems you don't know what that word means .

First , why are you comparing human beings to animals ? They are not rational in the first place and they dont know what they are doing . Indeed they are practicing all kinds of taboos and s3xual activities that are not acceptable but these very animals you are talking about doesnt know if they are commiting INCEST , HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES etc .

Show you proofs ? Where ? Here in the forums ? Most likely it wont happen .

Animals are not RATIONAL being , this proves that they didn't choose to become a homosexual or bisexual - it's ATTRACTION , and in something in NATURE .

Since when it happened again ? MING DYNASTY ? Did the Chinese say that a COUPLE also is composed of a MAN and a MAN ? Or a WOMAN and a WOMAN ? Just because GAY MARRIAGE or SAME *** MARRIAGE is legal to some countries , it doesnt change the fact that a COUPLE is about a MAN and a WOMAN and wether you like it or not , it stays like that . Thats how the ANALOGY took place because it is meant to be like that .

Although the Chinese never said the couple is composed of the same s3x , but you were asking when this activity started . Saying that a couple is ONLY composed of a man and woman , it is now FALSE since there are couples are of same s3x , living happily , and their marriage is recognized as LEGAL .

Dont entice me with your definition . Although it is correct , your reflection about " shares common beliefs , bonding , love , honesty , and devotion towards each other " will never materialized . A REAL COUPLE dili man gani mo lahutay usahay , much more pa kaha sa dili meant ?

Whaaaaaaat ? Those will never materialized ? Are you drunk ?? Those I've mentioned are important in marriage or partnership , and once one of them is missing , relationship or marriage will be in jeopardy and even will result to "di malahutay" . I can't believe I still have to explain this to a married man .

You are talking about MANS IMPERFECTNESS . That is not RELIGION . And there are still BILLIONS of people who still talk about PROHIBITION , MORALS and VALUES and practices what it preaches .

What do you mean MANS IMPERFECTNESS ? Those I've mentioned are SINS written in the BIBLE !! Your answer doesn't make sense .

[dubby]

@SPRINGFIELD_XD_40

Sir you will only till you try shoving a 12 inches into your rectum...try it you might convert yourself
....enjoy